›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 1911-1918.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.07.009

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微型桩-加筋土挡墙应力变形特性的多因素分析

张智超1,陈育民2,刘汉龙3,柳 侃1,叶龙珍1   

  1. 1. 福建省地质工程勘察院 国土资源部丘陵山地地质灾害防治重点实验室,福建 福州 350002;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-21 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:张智超,男,1986年生,博士,工程师,主要从事地质灾害的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51609040);福建省自然科学基金(No. 2016J05112);福建省科技创新平台建设(No. 2014Y2007)。

Multivariate analysis of stress and deformation behavior of micropile-MSE wall

ZHANG Zhi-chao1, CHEN Yu-min2, LIU Han-long3, LIU Kan1, YE Long-zhen1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Hilly Mountains, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, Fujian Geological Engineering Survey Institute, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China; 2. College of Civil & Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
  • Received:2015-08-21 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51609040), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2016J05112) and the Science and Technology Innovation Platform of Fujian Province (2014Y2007).

摘要: 山区斜坡地带加筋土挡墙的破坏模式为回填土区域沿着边坡产生整体下滑,且回填土强度的降低会更显著地增加挡土墙的变形。针对这种破坏模式,开发了微型桩加固方法,建立了加固前、后的斜坡土挡墙有限元模型,并通过对静载模型试验的数值模拟,对有限元模型的可靠性进行了验证。在此基础上,就自然边坡状况和回填土强度这两个重要因素对微型桩-加筋土挡墙的应力变形特性开展分析。结果表明:微型桩的加固能够有效抑制回填土区域的下滑,根据自然边坡状况的不同,挡土墙位移可较加固前减小6.25%~46.9%,且坡面摩擦角越低,加固前、后的差别越显著;根据回填土强度的不同,挡土墙位移可减小6%~56.1%,且回填土强度越低,减小的比例越大;同时,侧向土压力和回填土的变形也显著降低。其结果可为微型桩-加筋土挡墙在山区公路工程中的实际应用提供指导。

关键词: 加筋土挡墙, 数值模拟, 应力变形特性, 微型桩, 模型试验

Abstract: Failure mode of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall in slope areas exhibits as the integral sliding of the backfill region along the slope. Particularly, the reduction of backfill strength obviously exacerbates the deformation of the wall. In this study, a novel micropile reinforcement scheme was proposed to investigate this failure mode. Finite element models of MSE wall of the slope before and after reinforcement were established and further validated by scaled model tests. Based on different natural conditions of the slope and the backfill strength, multivariate analysis was performed numerically to compare the stress and deformation behavior of MSE wall before and after micropile reinforcement. The results indicate that the reinforcement of micropiles can effectively prevent the sliding of backfill region along the slope. The displacements of the wall were decreased by 6.25% to 46.9%, according to different natural conditions of backslope. Moreover, the more obvious decrement was found when the backslope friction angle was lower. Based on different backfill strengths, the displacements were reduced by 6% to 56.1%, and the reduction was greater when the backfill strength was lower. In addition, the earth pressure and deformation of backfill soil declined greatly as well. Therefore, the results can provide an important guidance for the application of micropile-MSE wall in the practical engineering of road construction in mountainous areas.

Key words: mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall, numerical simulation, stress and deformation behavior, micropile, model tests

中图分类号: 

  • TU 476+.4

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[5] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[7] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[8] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[9] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[10] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[11] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[12] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[13] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[14] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[15] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!