›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 1926-1932.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.07.011

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于极限分析法的溶洞顶板极限承载力研究

雷 勇1,尹君凡1,陈秋南1,杨 威2   

  1. 1.湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201; 2. 湖南省农林工业勘察设计研究总院,湖南 长沙 410007
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-22 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:雷勇,男,1983年生,博士,博士,现任讲师,主要从事桩基础及特殊土地基处理方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51208195);岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室开放基金资助(No. E21618)。

Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of cave roof using limit analysis method

LEI Yong1, YIN Jun-fan1, CHEN Qiu-nan1, YANG Wei2   

  1. 1.Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China;2.Hunan Prospecting Designing and Research Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Industries, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China
  • Received:2016-09-22 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51208195) and the Found of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring (E21618).

摘要: 针对下伏溶洞顶板极限承载力问题,提出了两种顶板极限承载力计算方法;方法1:假定冲切体为圆锥台,由极限平衡法得出极限平衡状态下破坏面上拉应力与剪应力同时作用时的极限承载力;方法2:假定冲切体是以一个未知曲线为母线的旋转体,由极限分析法求出其母线形式以及极限承载力的表达式,通过求偏导获得了溶洞顶板的极限承载力。同时进行了下伏溶洞顶板极限承载力室内模型试验,得到了1~5倍桩径顶板厚度下溶洞顶板基岩的破坏模式以及相应的极限承载力,实测结果与理论吻合良好。研究表明:溶洞顶板厚度为1D至3D(D为桩径)时,发生冲切破坏,破坏模式是以曲线为母线的旋转体,4D时发生撕裂+冲切复合破坏,5D时基岩出现塑性破坏。在溶洞顶板厚度为1D~4D时,同一跨径比条件下,极限承载力随顶板厚度的增加呈线性增长,达到5D时,顶板承载力与基岩基本一致。

关键词: 溶洞顶板, 极限承载力, 极限分析, 试验研究, 冲切破坏

Abstract: Two methods are proposed for the determination of the ultimate bearing capacity of cave roofs. Method 1: assuming that the punching body is a truncated cone, the ultimate bearing capacity of cave roofs can be determined by applying tensile stress and shear stress simultaneously on failure surface using limit bearing method. Method 2: assuming that the punching body is a rotating body with an unknown curve as the generatrix, the expression of the generatrix and the ultimate bearing capacity is obtained by the limit analysis method. The ultimate bearing capacity of the roof is obtained by partial derivatives. Laboratory model experiments of the ultimate bearing capacity of cave roofs are conducted. The failure modes and the corresponding ultimate bearing capacity are obtained when the roof’s thickness varies from 1D to 5D. The measured data is in good agreement with theoretical calculation result. The study shows that the punching shear failure mode happens when roof’s thickness varies from 1D to 3D, and the failure pattern has a surface of revolution with a curve shape. When roof’s thickness reaches 4D, a failure mode of tearing damage and punching shear failure occurs. Plastic failure develops when roof’s thickness reaches 5D. The ultimate bearing capacity increases linearly with the increase of roof’s thickness from 1D to 4D in the same span-diameter ratio. When roof’s thickness reaches 5D, the ultimate bearing capacity of the cave roof is close to the ultimate bearing capacity of bedrock.

Key words: cave roof, ultimate bearing capacity, limit analysis, experimental study, punching shear failure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[2] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[3] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[4] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[5] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 刘奇, 荣驰, . 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[6] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[7] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[8] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[9] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[10] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[11] 李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
[12] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[13] 周 辉, 郑 俊, 胡大伟, 张传庆, 卢景景, 高 阳, 张旺, . 碳酸性水环境下隧洞衬砌结构劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2469-2477.
[14] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[15] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!