›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 1974-1982.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.07.017

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单轴压缩下含层理加锚岩石力学特性研究

腾俊洋1, 2 ,张宇宁1, 2,唐建新1, 2,张 闯1, 2,李臣林1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学 资源及环境科学学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-21 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 唐建新,男,1959年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿山压力及地下工程围岩稳定性的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jtxtang@cqu.edu.cn E-mail: jteng89@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:腾俊洋,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道及地下工程围岩稳定性研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室自主课题重点项目(No. 2011DA105287-ZD201504)。

Mechanical behaviors of anchored bedding rock under uniaxial compression

TENG Jun-yang1, 2, ZHANG Yu-ning1, 2, TANG Jian-xin1, 2, ZHANG Chuang1, 2, LI Chen-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2016-08-21 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of State Key Lab. of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control (2011DA105287-ZD201504).

摘要: 为分析锚固方式和层理对加锚岩石力学特性影响规律,采用相似材料预制含层理岩石,室内钻取0°和90°层理标准试件,以45号钢加工而成的螺杆模拟锚杆,分别对试件进行端部锚固和全长锚固,从而得到不加锚杆、端部锚固、全长锚固3种试件,而后在MTS815岩石力学试验系统上对试件进行单轴压缩试验分析其变形、强度特征。结果表明:锚杆可提高岩石的强度,且层理方向和锚固方式影响其对强度的提高幅度。层理相同的加锚试件,全长锚固下岩石的抗压强度提高幅度大于端部锚固岩石;同一锚固方式下,90°层理加锚试件的单轴抗压强度提高幅度大于0°层理加锚试件。锚固方式不同,加锚试件的破坏形式亦有所差别。根据锚固方式不同,可将破坏形式分为剪切拉伸和剪切错断2种。锚固方式对加锚试件锚杆失效模式无影响,二者均表现为岩体与灌浆界面滑脱,但全长锚固与端部锚固所不同的是,全长锚固锚杆与岩石粘结长度更大,粘结强度更高,失效时可带出更多、更厚的岩石碎屑。

关键词: 层理, 加锚岩石, 力学特性, 锚固机制, 破坏形式

Abstract: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of anchoring mode and bedding on mechanical properties of anchored rock. Similar materials were used to precast bedding rocks and standard specimens with 0° and 90° bedding were made in the laboratory. Anchor bolts made of #45 steel were applied to perform end anchoring and full-length anchoring, and thus, three kinds of specimens were obtained by end-anchoring, full-length anchoring and non-anchoring, respectively. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and deformation of specimens were obtained by using MTS815 rock mechanical experiment system. The results show that the UCS of rock was enhanced by the anchor. Specifically, the UCS increment was influenced by the bedding direction and anchoring mode. For anchored specimens with the same bedding, the UCS increment of full-length anchored rock was greater than that of the end-anchored rock. For the specimens with the same anchoring method, the increase amplitude of UCS of anchored specimen with 90° bedding was higher than that of the anchored specimen with 0° bedding. It is found that failure modes of anchored specimens are affected by anchoring types and they are further divided into shearing extension and shearing offset. Failure modes of anchor in anchored specimens are not affected by anchoring methods, and both of anchoring methods slipped between rock mass and grouting interface. However, the differences between the end anchorage and the full-length anchorage are that the latter has longer bond length between the anchor and rock, the higher bond strength was, and the more and thicker rock debris were after failure.

Key words: Bedding, anchored rock, mechanical properties, anchoring mechanism, failure mode

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[2] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[3] 陈虎, 叶义成, 王其虎, 胡南燕, 刘冉, 江慧敏. 基于岩梁−块体理论的巷道软弱层直接顶板 破坏形式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1447-1454.
[4] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[5] 李斌, 黄 达, 马文著, . 层理面特性对砂岩断裂力学行为的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 858-868.
[6] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[7] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[8] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[9] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[10] 王冲, 胡大伟, 任金明, 周辉, 卢景景, 刘传新, . 侵蚀性环境对地下结构渗透和力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
[11] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[12] 靳 潇, 杨 文, 孟宪红, 雷乐乐, . 基于双电层模型冻土中未冻水含量理论推演及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1449-1456.
[13] 丛 怡, 丛 宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
[14] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[15] 郑广辉, 许金余, 王 鹏, 方新宇, 王佩玺, 闻 名, . 冻融循环作用下层理砂岩物理特性及劣化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 632-641.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!