›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 2029-2035.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.07.024

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算

杨明辉,戴夏斌,赵明华,罗 宏   

  1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-28 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:杨明辉,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事桩基础及特殊土路基工程研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51278184,No. 50708030);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(No. NCET-13-194);湖南大学青年教师成长资助项目。

Calculation of active earth pressure for limited soils with curved sliding surface

YANG Ming-hui, DAI Xia-bin, ZHAO Ming-hua, LUO Hong   

  1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
  • Received:2015-08-28 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278184, 50708030), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China (NCET-13-194) and the Excellent Young Teachers Program of Hunan University.

摘要: 开展了刚性挡墙平动变位模式情况下墙后有限宽度土体破坏试验。试验结果表明,在墙后填土宽度较小情况下,土体破坏面为通过墙踵及某一固定点的曲面,由此基于变分极限平衡法,导得滑裂面曲线的具体方程式为对数螺旋曲线。在此基础上,结合薄层单元法,得到了墙后有限宽度土体的主动土压力合力及土压力强度的分布。与室内观测结果及库仑土压力值的对比表明,该方法相比经典土压力方法更接近于实测值。分析了不同填土宽高比n下的主动土压力分布规律,结果表明,主动土压力随n增加而逐渐增加,但n达到0.55时趋于稳定,因此,该值可作为墙后土体有限宽度的界限值。

关键词: 主动土压力, 有限土体, 曲线滑裂面, 变分极限平衡法, 薄层单元法

Abstract: An experiment is conducted to determine the active earth pressure for soil with limited width behind a retaining wall in translational motion. The test results show that a continuous failure surface of limited-width soil behind a retaining wall passes through the wall toe and a fixed point. Based on the variational limit equilibrium method, a specific equation for the curve of the slip surface is deduced with logarithmic helical curve. The distribution of active soil pressure and soil pressure intensity with a limited width behind wall are derived using thin-layer element method. Comparing with the results of laboratory observations and Coulomb earth pressure, the result by the proposed method is closer to the measured value than the classical earth pressure method. The distribution of the active earth pressure is analyzed under different ratios n of the width to height of the backfill. The results show that the active earth pressure increases with the increasing of n, but approaching to a constant value as n reaches a threshold of limited width of 0.55.

Key words: active earth pressure, limited soil, curved sliding surface, variational limit equilibrium method, thin-layered element method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432

[1] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[2] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[3] 陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[4] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[5] 刘美麟,侯艳娟,张顶立,房 倩. 砂土地层中考虑基坑施工效应的柔性挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 149-158.
[6] 韩同春, 谢灵翔, 刘 振, . 坑中坑条件下基坑有限土体的被动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4404-4412.
[7] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,郎瑞卿,纪玉诚, . 轴对称主动土压力问题的滑移线解[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4133-4141.
[8] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[9] 骆 晗,李荣建,刘军定,霍旭挺,张 真,孙 萍,. 基于联合强度的黄土主动土压力公式与计算比较[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2080-2086.
[10] 张 健,王新征,胡瑞林,. 无限倾斜填土非竖直墙背条件下地震主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1069-1074.
[11] 刘忠玉,陈 捷,李东阳,. 考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2443-2450.
[12] 王闫超,晏鄂川,陆文博,丛 璐,朱存金,李兴明,叶世伟. 无黏性有限土体主动土压力解析解[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2513-2520.
[13] 岳树桥,左人宇,陆 钊,. 相邻基坑有限宽度土条主动土压力的计算[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2063-2069.
[14] 陈建功,周廷强,胡日成, . 柔性支护结构主动土压力的变分计算方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3365-3370.
[15] 朱建明,林庆涛,高晓将,高林生,. 临近地下室外墙影响下的挡土墙空间土压力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3417-3426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!