›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 2096-2102.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.07.033

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

破碎泥岩注浆结石体动力特性的SHPB试验及其数值模拟研究

詹金武,李 涛   

  1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑学院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-21 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 李涛,男,1960年生,博士,教授,主要从事地下工程、环境岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: taoli@bjtu.edu.cn E-mail:zhanjinwu1989@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:詹金武,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要研究方向为岩土与地下工程。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划资助(No. 2014CB046906)。

SHPB tests and numerical simulation of dynamic behavior of grouting-reinforced fractured mudstone

ZHAN Jin-wu, LI Tao   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2016-06-21 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB046906).

摘要: 通过简化控制注浆模仿过程制备注浆结石体试样,借助分离式Hopkinson压杆(SHPB)装置,开展了不同注浆含量比及含水状态条件下破碎泥岩注浆结石体的动力特性研究,同时利用有限元软件Ansys/LS-Dyna对SHPB试验过程进行了数值模拟,对比分析数值模拟与试验实测结果的相似性。试验结果显示,注浆含量比变化对试样的动态力学性能有较大的影响,只有在泥岩破碎程度适中、浆液具备较好压注条件时注浆效果才能达到最佳;在相同含量比条件下,含水率变化对试样动态力学性也有较大影响,试样含水率越高,其峰值强度及弹性模量普遍越小。数值模拟得到的应力-应变曲线与实测的应力-应变曲线具有较好的吻合效果;对HJC模型参数选取的合理性分析表明,模型参数A和B与动态峰值应力之间有较强的关联性,其值随着强度的增长有不断增加的趋势。

关键词: SHPB试验, 动力特性, 泥岩, 注浆结石体, 数值模拟, HJC模型

Abstract: In this paper, we prepared samples of grouting-reinforced fractured mudstone with different grouting contents and moisture conditions by simplifying the simulation of grouting process. Dynamic characteristics of grouting-reinforced fractured mudstone sampled were investigated by a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). Furthermore, the experimental process of SHPB test was simulated by using finite element software Ansys/LS-Dyna, and numerical results were analyzed and compared with experimental data. The results show that dynamic properties of samples were significantly influenced the grouting content. The best grouting effect was achieved when the degree of mudstone crushing was moderate and the slurry had a good pressure condition. In addition, the water content obviously affected the dynamic behaviors of samples with the same grouting content. In general, the higher water content resulted in smaller peak strength and elastic modulus. The stress-strain curve by numerical simulation was in good agreement with experimental one. The rationality analysis of the HJC model parameters shows that there is a strong correlation between the model parameters (A and B) and dynamic peak stress, and their values increase with the increase of strength.

Key words: SHPB test, dynamic behavior, mudstone, grouting-reinforced body, numerical simulation, HJC model

中图分类号: 

  • TD 265.4

[1] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[5] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[6] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[7] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[8] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[9] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[10] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[11] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[12] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[13] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[14] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[15] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!