›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 167-172.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.019

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于扰动状态概念的桩–土相互作用的新荷载渐进性传递模型

黄 明1,2,张冰淇1,陈福全1,许德祥1   

  1. 1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116;2. 西华大学 绿色建筑与节能重点实验室 四川 成都 610039
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-25 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈福全,男,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: phdchen@fzu.edu.cn E-mail:huangming05@163.com
  • 作者简介:黄明,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为岩土与地下工程。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41672290);福建省自然科学基金项目(No. 2016J01189);西华大学绿色建筑与节能重点实验室开放基金项目(No. szjj2016-097)。

A new incremental load transfer model of pile-soil interaction based on disturbed state concept

HUANG Ming1,2, ZHANG Bing-qi1, CHEN Fu-quan1, XU De-xiang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Green Building and Energy Saving, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610039, China
  • Received:2016-10-25 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (41672290), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2016J01189), and the Open Research Fund of Xihua University Key Laboratory of Green Building and Energy Saving (szjj2016-097).

摘要: 结合扰动状态理论(DSC),详细地分析了桩–土相互作用的荷载渐进性传递机制,提出基于DSC的荷载传递函数及其参数辨识方法。基于Matlab编程,重点分析了模型参数对 曲线的影响规律。分析结果表明,参数 对桩土界面的强度特性的影响具有决定性作用,反映了桩土界面单元强度分布的集中程度,合理地选取参数 可以较好地描述桩–土界面的硬化、软化及弹塑性特性;参数 、 对界面的强度特性影响较小,参数的改变只对最大侧摩阻力值产生影响, 、 越大,侧阻力的极值也越大,但对 曲线的线形几乎无影响;参数 对界面强度特性和 曲线的线形都有一定的影响, 越大峰值强度越大,界面强度越高,达到侧摩阻力峰值所对应的界面位移越小。结合依托工程,理论模型计算结果与现场试桩实测值吻合较好,检验了该模型的正确与可靠性,对工程实际具有重要指导意义。

关键词: 扰动状态概念;桩&ndash, 土相互作用;渐进性;荷载传递函数; 曲线

Abstract: A new incremental transfer model of pile-soil interaction is presented on the basis of the disturbed state concept(DSC), and the load transmission mechanism is analyzed as well. According to the result obtained with Matlab, the influence law of the model parameters to the relationship between and is analyzed. It show that, the parameter has a decisive influence on the pile-soil interface strength, reflect the concentration degree of the pile-soil interface element strength distribution, which means that the hardening, softening and elastic plastic characteristics of pile-soil interface can be described by choosing the proper parameter. The parameters and have relatively smaller influence on interface strength, since the change in the parameters only has effect on the maximum value of shaft resistance. The greater the parameters and , the greater the extreme value of the lateral frictional resistance, but it has little influence on the shape of the curve. The parameter can affect both the strength interface and curve in a certain way, the greater the peak intensity of , the higher the interface strength, the smaller the interface displacement corresponding to the peak of the lateral frictional resistance. Due to the fact that the theoretical curves agree well with the curves from static loading test, it has a certain guiding significance on engineering practices.

Key words: disturbed state concept (DSC), pile-soil interaction, gradualness, load transmission function;

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 郭昭胜,贺武斌,白晓红. 桩-承台-土复合受力体的拟静力模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3321-3330.
[2] 周佳锦,龚晓南,严天龙,张日红, . 软土地区填砂竹节桩抗压承载性能研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3425-3432.
[3] 肖勇杰,陈福全,董译之. 基于Gudehus-Bauer模型的砂土中灌注桩护壁套管高频振动贯入速率[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3011-3019.
[4] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[5] 戴国亮,万志辉 ,竺明星,龚维明, . 基于黏度时变性的桩端压力浆液上返高度模型及工程应用[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2941-2950.
[6] 魏焕卫,孙 川,王建强,李 瑜,刘 聪,张 伟,. 堆载下桩+地下墙水平承载组合基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 203-210.
[7] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[8] 刘美麟,侯艳娟,张顶立,房 倩. 砂土地层中考虑基坑施工效应的柔性挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 149-158.
[9] 尹志强,佘成学,姚海林,卢 正,骆行文,. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[10] 王翔鹰,陈育民,江 强,刘汉龙, . 抗液化排水刚性桩沉桩过程的土压力响应[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2184-2192.
[11] 戴笑如,王建华,范怡飞, . 钻井船插桩CEL数值模拟中的若干问题分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2278-2286.
[12] 熊 辉,江雅丰,禹荣霞. 层状地基中基于Laplace变换的桩基横向振动阻抗计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1901-1907.
[13] 李 亚,李书兆,张 超. 黏土中自升式钻井船插桩对邻近桩基影响的分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1891-1900.
[14] 刘海峰,朱长歧,孟庆山,王 星,李小刚,吴文娟, . 礁灰岩嵌岩桩的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1581-1588.
[15] 黄俊杰,王 薇,苏 谦,李 婷,王 迅,. 素混凝土桩复合地基支承路堤变形破坏模式[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1653-1661.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!