›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 255-262.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.031

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于全局极限响应面的预应力锚索加固边坡抗震可靠度分析

陈春舒,夏元友   

  1. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,武汉430070
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-18 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:陈春舒,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性和边坡抗震方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51374163)

Seismic reliability analysis of slope reinforced with prestressed anchor cable based on global limit response surface

CHEN Chun-shu, XIA Yuan-you   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2016-12-18 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Surface Project of China(51374163).

摘要: 通过反向采用极向条分的极限分析上限法获取临界强度参数对,拟合得到预应力锚索边坡对应的抗震全局极限响应面方程,将其作为内核函数使用Monte Carlo模拟得到特定地震烈度下的预应力锚索加固边坡的失稳概率和可靠度指标,避免直接使用极限分析上限法而造成的抽样和寻优算法的冗余嵌套。将该方法应用于预应力锚索加固边坡算例中,并将抗震全局极限响应面与基于“均值最不利滑动面”的极限响应面进行了对比,结果表明全局极限滑动面所得失稳概率较大,特定滑面的极限响应面法偏于不安全。进一步分析了锚索参数对边坡抗震失稳概率的影响以及失稳概率与可靠度的关系曲线,表明该方法很好地兼顾了变异参数空间的全局性以及计算的高效性,可以为基于可靠度的预应力锚索边坡抗震设计提供理论参考。

关键词: 预应力锚索边坡, 极限分析, 全局极限响应面, Monte Carol模拟, 失稳概率, 可靠度指标

Abstract: The critical strength parameter pairs are calculated by reversely using the upper-bound limit analysis with polar slice method, which are treated as fitting data to obtain the seismic global limit response surface. The seismic global limit response surface is then regarded as kernel function and applied to Monte Carlo simulation to obtain the seismic failure probability and corresponding reliability index of reinforced slope with prestressed anchor cable, which avoided redundant and nested calculations by directly using the upper-bound limit analysis. In addition, this method is applied to a typical slope case which is reinforced with prestressed anchor cable. The results of limit response surface based on “the most adverse sliding surface with mean parameter” is calculated and compared with ones of global limit response surface. The results show that the failure probability of global limit response surface is larger than the other one; therefore, the method based on specific limit response surfaces may tend to be unsafe. Moreover, the influence of anchor parameters on seismic failure probability and the relationship curve between failure probability and reliability index are analyzed respectively. This method gives consideration to both the global variation of parameter space and efficiency of computation, so as to provide theory references for the seismic design of reinforced slope with prestressed anchor cable based on reliability index.

Key words: slope reinforced with prestressed anchor cable, limit analysis, global limit response surface, Monte Carol simulation, failure probability, reliability index

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[2] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[3] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[4] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[5] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[6] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[7] 冯凌云, 朱斌, 代加林, 孔德琼, . 深海管道水平向管−土相互作用 大变形连续极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[8] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[9] 徐 鹏,蒋关鲁,邱俊杰,林展展,王智猛,. 基于二楔块法的加筋土挡墙屈服加速度及破坏模式极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2765-2770.
[10] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[11] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[12] 曹文贵,谭建辉,胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[13] 李 泽,刘 毅,周 宇,王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[14] 郑 刚,聂东清,刁 钰,程雪松,. 基坑多级支护破坏模式研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 313-322.
[15] 雷 勇,尹君凡,陈秋南,杨 威,. 基于极限分析法的溶洞顶板极限承载力研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1926-1932.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!