›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 277-283.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.034

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

天然与饱水状态下石膏岩蠕变试验研究

刘秀敏1,蒋玄苇1,陈从新1,夏开宗1, 2,周意超1, 2,宋许根1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-15 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 夏开宗,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性、地下采矿稳定性等方面的研究工作。E-mail:xiakaizong1988@sina.com E-mail:xmliu@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘秀敏,女,1981年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事边坡及地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51274188)

Study of creep characteristics of gypsum rock in natural and saturated states

LIU Xiu-min1, JIANG Xuan-wei1, CHEN Cong-xin1, XIA Kai-zong1, 2, ZHOU Yi-chao1, 2, SONG Xu-gen1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geolechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2016-08-15 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China(51274188).

摘要: 石膏岩的饱水软化蠕变特性是影响石膏矿采空区安全评价的重要因素。以荆门石膏矿岩为研究对象,开展天然与饱水状态下的单试样逐级增量加载试验,分析了饱水软化作用下石膏岩的蠕变特性,选取西原模型描述石膏岩的本构关系。分析结果可得,饱水试样总蠕变量大于天然试样;饱水试样蠕变破坏强度(11 MPa)是天然试样蠕变破坏强度(21.5 MPa)的0.54倍,长期强度(10 MPa)是天然试样长期强度(19.5 MPa)的0.49倍。利用西原模型对蠕变曲线进行拟合并分析拟合参数可知,饱水试样参数E1是天然试样的0.1~0.5倍,η1是天然试样的0.2~0.7倍,E2是天然试样的2~10倍。以上结论均表明饱水试样的蠕变特性更加明显。分析讨论饱水软化作用对石膏岩蠕变特性影响机制可知,荆门石膏岩软化作用主要由物理软化作用及化学软化作用耦合而成,物理软化作用主要为静水作用下的孔压效应,化学软化作用主要为石膏岩的重结晶作用。试验分析结果可为石膏矿采空区安全评价提供依据,具有重要的工程实际意义。

关键词: 石膏岩, 蠕变, 饱水, 长期强度, 西原流变模型

Abstract: The saturated and softening creep characteristics of gypsum rock have important impacts in the safety evaluation of gypsum mine goaf. Taking Jingmen gypsum mine as the research object, the saturated and softening creep characteristics of gypsum rock are analyzed by carrying out single sample step by step increment load experiment in natural or saturated conditions; the constitutive relation of gypsum rock has been described by Nishihara model. The results show that the total creep deformation of saturated states is large than the natural; the average strength (11 MPa) of saturated samples is 0.54 times of the natural samples (21.5 MPa), the average long-term strength of saturated samples (10 MPa) is 0.49 times of natural samples (19.5 MPa); using the Nishihara model to fit the creep curve and analyze the creep parameter; the fitting results show that the creep parameter E1 is 0.1-0.5 times of natural sample; η1 is 0.2-0.7 times; E2 is 2-10 times. The above results indicate that the creep characteristics of saturated samples are more obvious than the natural ones. By analyzing the mechanism of creep characteristics of water-softening gypsum rock, we can draw the conclusion: the water-softening of gypsum rock includes the hole-pressure effect under hydrostatic pressure in physical layer aspect and recrystallization in chemical layer aspect. The resulting findings can provide basis for safety evaluation of gypsum rock goaf, which has important actual engineering significance.

Key words: mining engineering, gypsum mine, creep, water-saturated, long-term strength, visco-elastoplastic model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[2] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
[3] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[4] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[5] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[6] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[7] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 379-388.
[8] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[9] 王立业, 周凤玺, 秦虎, . 饱和盐渍土分数阶蠕变模型及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 543-551.
[10] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[11] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[12] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[13] 曹 梦, 叶剑红, . 中国南海钙质砂蠕变-应力-时间四参数数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1771-1777.
[14] 罗丹旎, 苏国韶, 何保煜, . 不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[15] 朱赛楠, 殷跃平, 李 滨, . 二叠系炭质页岩软弱夹层剪切蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1377-1386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!