›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 351-358.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.043

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深井大断面沿空留巷底板裂隙分形特征动态演化规律试验研究

杨 朋1,2,华心祝1,2,刘钦节1,2,杨 明1,2,成世兴1,2,吴 标3   

  1. 1. 安徽理工大学 能源与安全学院,安徽 淮南 232001;2. 煤矿安全高效开采省部共建教育部重点实验室,安徽 淮南 232001; 3. 淮南国力液压装备有限公司,安徽 凤台 233100
  • 收稿日期:2002-11-27 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 华心祝,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事采矿工程方面的教学科研工作。E-mail:xzhhua@aust.edu.cn E-mail:pyangaust@126.com
  • 作者简介:杨朋,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事深部巷道围岩稳定性控制方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51274010)。

Experimental study of dynamic evolution characteristic of floor fractal dimension of gob-side entry retaining with large section in deep mine

YANG Peng1,2, HUA Xin-zhu1,2, LIU Qin-jie1,2, YANG Ming1,2, CHENG Shi-xing1,2, WU Biao3   

  1. 1. School of Energy & Safety, Anhui University of Science & Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mine Safety and High-efficiency Coal Mining, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science & Technology, Huainan Anhui li232001, China; 3. Huainan Guoli Yeya Zhuangbei Co., Ltd., Fengtai, Anhui 233100, China
  • Received:2002-11-27 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51274010).

摘要: 深井大断面沿空留巷常见严重底鼓问题,为更好揭示底鼓机理,利用自行研制的两向四面加载试验装置,结合顾桥矿1115(1)工作面轨道顺槽工程地质条件,采用相似材料模拟方法研究了深井大断面沿空留巷底板在掘进、一次采动、留巷和二次采动影响期间裂隙动态演化规律,并基于分形几何理论定量分析了分形维数变化规律及其与底鼓量的关系。研究结果表明,底板裂隙随着回采逐步发育、扩展、贯通,以剪切破坏的中高角度裂隙分布为主;底板裂隙分形维数逐渐增加,在顶板来压和留巷期间均有明显的升维现象;由于留巷上部基本顶的“回弹”现象,第二个工作面上覆岩层作用于煤体的载荷较小,导致在第二个工作面回采前期,底板裂隙分形维数增量较小;底鼓量和分形维数呈非线性正相关关系。通过对比现场实测底鼓量和试验底鼓量,发现二者能够较好吻合,验证模型试验结果的真实可靠。

关键词: 深井, 沿空留巷, 底鼓, 裂隙, 分形维数

Abstract: It is common to see the phenomenon of serious floor heave of gob-side entry retaining with large section in deep mine. To reveal the mechanism of floor heave of gob-side entry retaining with large section in deep mine; based on the engineering geological condition of 1115(1) working face tailentry and with the self-developed physical model test equipment, a study about the dynamic evolution law of floor fracture and floor fractal dimension in excavation period, the first mining influenced period, roadway retaining period, the second mining influenced period is conducted according to fractal geometry theory. And the relation between floor fractal dimension and floor heave is obtained. The results show that: First, the floor fracture developed, expanded and penetrated gradually with mining, and the fracture distributed mainly in middle and high angles because of shear failure. Second, the fractal dimension of floor fracture increased gradually, and there is a significant rise during main roof caving and roadway retaining. Third, as the spring back of main roof; the load from overlying strata of the second working face is small; the bottom fractal dimension increases slowly. Fourth, the relation between floor heave and fractal dimension is nonlinear and positive. By comparing the field measured and tested results of floor heave, it is found that the both two can be able to fit, so as to verify the model test results is reliable.

Key words: deep mine, gob-side entry retaining, floor heave, fracture, fractal dimension

中图分类号: 

  • TU 322

[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[3] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[4] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[5] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[6] 高雪峰, 张延军, 黄奕斌, 赵熠, 倪金, 马静晨. 花岗岩粗糙单裂隙对流换热特性的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1761-1769.
[7] 夏才初, 王岳嵩, 郑金龙, 吕志涛. 裂隙岩体不均匀冻胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1161-1168.
[8] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[9] 侯晓萍, 陈胜宏. 采用复合单元法模拟裂隙多孔介质变饱和流动[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1437-1446.
[10] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
[11] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[12] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[13] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[14] 肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[15] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!