›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 374-380.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.046

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

五嘎冲拱坝坝肩加固效果分析及整体安全度评价

程 恒2,傅志浩3,张国新1,2,杨 波2,江晨芳2   

  1. 1. 中国水利水电科学研究院 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室,北京 100038; 2. 中国水利水电科学研究院 结构材料所,北京 100038;3. 中水珠江规划勘测设计有限公司,广州 广东 510610
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-16 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:程恒,男,1982年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事水工结构数值仿真分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51579252,No. 51439005);流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室自主研究课题(No. 2015TS05);中国水利水电科学研究院基本科研业务费专项项目(No. SS0145B322017);国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2016YFB0201000)。

Reinforcement effect analysis and global safety evaluation of Wugachong arch dam and its abutment

CHENG Heng2, FU Zhi-hao3, ZHANG Guo-xin1, 2, YANG Bo2, JIANG Chen-fang2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin,China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,Beijing 100038, China; 2. Department of Structures and Materials, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,Beijing 100038, China; 3. China Water Resources Pearl River Planning Surveying & Designing Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China
  • Received:2017-02-16 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579252, 51439005), the Independent Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin(2015TS05), the Special Research Project of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research(SS0145B322017), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFB0201000).

摘要: 五嘎冲拱坝右岸坝肩由于存在张性裂隙、软弱层以及泥化夹层等地质缺陷,坝肩抗滑稳定不能满足要求而采取加固措施。根据工程最新揭示的地质资料、拱坝结构设计成果以及加固处理措施,建立拱坝–地基整体三维数值模型。采用满足Mohr-Coulomb屈服准则的节理单元,模拟基岩中张性裂隙、软弱夹层、层间泥化夹层等构造。采用非线性有限元法,对加固前后坝基岩体及结构面的变形、屈服区进行对比分析,评价右岸坝肩加固处理措施的有效性,采用水容重超载法分析拱坝坝体和地基岩体的变形以及屈服状态的发展过程,给出加固处理后拱坝–地基系统的整体安全度,结合工程类比,综合评价五嘎冲拱坝的整体安全性。计算成果表明,针对右岸L1张性裂隙所进行的加固处理措施可明显提高右岸坝肩的稳定性,加固效果显著,五嘎冲拱坝坝肩加固处理后超载安全度较高,处于高坝工程的偏上位置。

关键词: 拱坝, 坝肩, 强度折减法, 超载法, 变形, 安全度

Abstract: Since there exist some geological defects such as extensional fractures, weak layers and clay interactions in the right dam abutment of Wugachong Arch Dam, the dam abutment anti-sliding stability cannot meet the safety requirements, thus some reinforcement measures need to be taken. According to the Wugachong Arch Dam’s latest geologic data and the arch dam structure design results, a 3D numerical model for the whole arch dam is built. The joint elements for Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion are adopted to simulate the structure of the foundation’s extensional fractures, weak layers and clay interactions. Using the nonlinear finite element method, the deformation and yield region of foundation rock and structural surfaces before and after reinforcement are compared; the effectiveness of the reinforcement measures to the right bank abutment is evaluated. The deformation and yield condition’s development of arch dam and foundation rock is analyzed by using water density overload method. And the global safety of arch dam-foundation system after reinforcement is given. By comparison with similar engineering, the Wugachong Arch Dam’s global safety is evaluated comprehensively. The results show that the reinforcement measures to the extensional fracture L1can improve on the right bank abutment stability obviously. After reinforcement, Wugachong Arch Dam’s abutment has high overload safety which is superior among the high dams.

Key words: arch dam, dam abutment, shear strength reduction method, overload method, deformation, safety

中图分类号: 

  • TV311

[1] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[2] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[3] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[4] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[5] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[6] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[7] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[8] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[9] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[10] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[11] 王刚, 秦相杰, 江成浩, 张振宇. 温度作用下CT三维重建煤体微观 结构的渗流和变形模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1750-1760.
[12] 王凯兴, 窦林名, 潘一山, OPARIN V N . 块系岩体非协调动力响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1227-1234.
[13] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[14] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[15] 黄晓虎, 易武, 黄海峰, 邓永煌. 优势流入渗与坡体变形关系研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1396-1403.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!