›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 2213-2220.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.08.008

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

渗透水压作用下完整砂岩剪切-渗流耦合试验研究

彭守建1, 2, 3,谭 虎1, 2,许 江1, 2,刘义鑫1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044; 2. 重庆大学 复杂煤气层瓦斯抽采国家地方联合工程实验室,重庆 400044;3. 中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司,重庆 400037
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-27 出版日期:2017-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:彭守建,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事矿山岩石力学、煤与瓦斯突出灾害动力学与控制等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51304255,No. 51474040);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No. 2014M552323);重庆市项目博士后资助 (No. Xm2014037)。

Experimental study on shear-seepage of coupled properties for complete sandstone under the action of seepage water pressure

PENG Shou-jian1, 2, 3, TAN Hu1, 2, XU Jiang1, 2, LIU Yi-xin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Methane Drainage in Complex Coal Gas Seam, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 3. Chongqing Research Institute of China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp., Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2015-09-27 Online:2017-08-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51304255, 51474040), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M552323) and the Postdoctoral Project Foundation of Chongqing (Xm2014037).

摘要: 利用自主研发的煤岩剪切-渗流耦合试验装置,开展了渗透水压作用下完整砂岩试件剪切-渗流耦合特征试验研究。结果表明:(1)在恒定渗透水压情况下,法向应力越大,砂岩的抗剪强度越高,法向变形则越小,砂岩的剪切变形过程可分为3个阶段:剪切变形的线性增长阶段、非稳定破裂发展阶段和剪断后的摩擦滑移阶段;(2)在恒定渗透水压情况下,法向应力越小,法向和剪切变形量越大,剪切断面的起伏程度越大,表面次生裂纹发育越明显、发育范围越宽,砂岩的破坏程度越严重;(3)在整个剪切过程中,剪应力出现几次明显的应力降,首次应力降出现在线弹性变化末期,同时伴有水流流出,说明首次应力降是第一条宏观贯通的裂纹所致,且法向应力越大,裂隙越窄,导水能力越差。

关键词: 砂岩, 渗透水压, 剪切-渗流, 耦合特征, 法向应力

Abstract: By using a self-developed shear-seepage coupling experimental device for coal rock, experiments were carried out on sandstone samples to obtain shear-seepage coupled properties under the action of seepage water. The results show that with constant seepage water pressure, the larger normal stress was, the higher shear strength was, but the smaller normal deformation was. Moreover, the shear deformation process of sandstone can be divided into three stages: the linear growth stage, the unstable fracture stage and the friction sliding stage, respectively. In the case of the constant seepage water pressure, as the normal stress decreased, the peak values of normal and shear deformation of specimen increased, and meanwhile the fluctuation of shear section grew. Besides, the surface crack growth became more obvious and widely distributed, and the damage of sandstone was more serious. In the total shear process, there were several apparent value reductions of shear stress. Usually, the first stress reduction occurred at the end of the stage of elastic deformation, and water flowed out at the same time, which means the first stress reduction caused by the first macrocrack is spatial connected. Furthermore, the larger normal stress is, the narrower fracture is and the worse water transmitting ability is. During the whole experimental process, the lower mean flow rate is, the smaller total flow is.

Key words: sandstone, seepage water pressure, shear-seepage, coupling characteristic, normal stress

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[3] 赵怡晴, 吴常贵, 金爱兵, 孙浩, . 热处理砂岩微观结构及力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[4] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[5] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[6] 李斌, 黄 达, 马文著, . 层理面特性对砂岩断裂力学行为的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 858-868.
[7] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[8] 夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱 鑫, 桂 洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗 流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[9] 杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透 特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[10] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[11] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
[12] 赵波, 张广清, 唐梅荣, 庄建满, 林灿坤, . 长期注水对致密砂岩油藏岩石力学 性质影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3344-3350.
[13] 许江, 邬君宇, 刘义鑫, 雷娇, . 不同充填度下岩体剪切−渗流耦合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3416-3424.
[14] 姜德义, 张水林, 陈 结, 杨 涛, 王小书, 谢凯楠, 蒋 翔, . 砂岩循环冻融损伤的低场核磁共振与 声发射概率密度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 436-444.
[15] 俞 缙, 张 欣, 蔡燕燕, 刘士雨, 涂兵雄, 傅国锋, . 水化学与冻融循环共同作用下砂岩细观损伤 与力学性能劣化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 455-464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!