›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 2306-2312.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.08.019

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非对称开挖基坑支撑式围护结构解析解

徐长节1, 2,殷 铭1,胡文韬2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 华东交通大学 土木建筑学院,江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-18 出版日期:2017-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:徐长节,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事基坑工程方面的研究。

Analytical solutions of calculating length of retaining structures of foundation pit under asymmetric excavation

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
  • Received:2015-09-18 Online:2017-08-11 Published:2018-06-05

摘要: 随着城市建设发展的需要,有两种甚至多种开挖深度的深基坑越来越常见,但设计时常按开挖较深侧单边设计,忽略两侧开挖深度不同带来的影响。基于等值梁法,通过改进开挖较浅侧围护结构所受土压力模式,推导了能考虑两侧挖深不同的支撑式围护结构深度计算公式,探讨了基坑开挖的非对称程度对围护结构插入比的影响。结果表明,相比于仅按单边设计,挖深较深侧对挖深较浅侧的推挤作用会使挖深较浅侧围护结构插入比增大,增大的幅度随非对称开挖程度的增加而增大,且挖深较深侧挖深越大,增大效应越显著。工程实例表明,综合考虑两侧挖深差异的影响,比仅按挖深较深侧单边设计更加经济、合理。

Abstract: As the increasingly harsh conditions of deep excavation in urban area, two or more different depths of excavation in one foundation pit are becoming more common. Ignoring the influences caused by two different asymmetric excavations, traditional method to solve this problem is simplifying the asymmetric excavation as symmetrical and using the deeper side in calculation. Given that, analytical solutions for the length of retaining structures in foundation pit considering the influences caused by two different asymmetric excavations have been deduced using the equivalent beam method. The influences on differences between retaining structures on two sides and their insertion ratio caused by two different asymmetric excavations have been investigated. The results show that, considering two different asymmetric excavations, insertion ratio of retaining structures located on the side of pit with shallower depth increases compared with calculating results without considering two different asymmetric excavation. This enhancing effect of insertion ratio becomes more obvious as the depth of deeper side of the excavation increases. Finally, a case study proved that the analytical solutions can improve the asymmetric excavation pit design method, and provide a useful and economic reference.

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 徐 鹏,蒋关鲁,王 宁,雷 涛,王智猛,. 填土相对密实度对加筋土挡墙的影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4010-4016.
[2] 肖 忠,王 琰,王元战,刘 莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[3] 杨 琪,张友谊,刘华强,秦 华,. 一种气泡轻质土路基受载-破坏模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3121-3129.
[4] 王路君,艾智勇, . 非稳态热传导时层状路面体系的温度响应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3139-3146.
[5] 杨山奇,卢坤林,史克宝,赵瀚天,陈一鸣,. 刚性挡土墙后三维被动滑裂面的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3303-3312.
[6] 吴 纲,孙红月,付崔伟,陈永珍,汤碧辉,. 软土虹吸排水完整井非稳定流模型及解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3355-3361.
[7] 欧孝夺,全守岳,彭远胜,江 杰,吕 波,蒋 华,. 新型装配式基坑支护结构设计与试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3433-3439.
[8] 赵明华,陈耀浩,杨超炜,肖 尧. 基于有限杆单元法的陡坡基桩非线性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3020-3028.
[9] 周 芬,梁 强,杜运兴. 单根无黏结预应力筋对加筋体力学性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2442-2450.
[10] 张玉伟,谢永利,翁木生,. 非对称基坑开挖对下卧地铁隧道影响的离心试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2555-2562.
[11] 艾智勇,慕金晶, . 竖向简谐荷载下二维层状饱和地基的解析层元解[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2632-2638.
[12] 王路君,艾智勇, . 地埋点热源作用下层状半空间的热-力耦合响应[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2052-2058.
[13] 陈文强,赵宇飞,周纪军,. 考虑受压侧岩体反力非线性作用的锚杆抗剪理论[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1662-1668.
[14] 谢 涛,罗 强,张 良,连继峰,于曰明, . 主动与被动状态下墙体侧向位移近似计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1682-1690.
[15] 付 晓,冀文有,张建经,曹礼聪,范 刚,. 锚索框架梁加固平面滑动型边坡地震动力响应[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1709-1719.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!