›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2473-2479.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.002

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

采动裂隙岩体压剪渗透规律试验研究

张文泉1,袁久党1,王忠昶2,朱纪明1   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 矿业与安全工程学院,山东 青岛 266590;2. 大连交通大学 土木与安全工程学院,辽宁 大连 116028
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-01 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:张文泉,男,1965年生,博士,博导,教授,主要从事矿井水灾害预测及防治方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然基金资助项目(No.41472281);2017年安全生产重特大事故防治关键技术科技项目(No.liaoning-0005-2017AQ)。

An experimental study on compressive shear seepage laws of mining-induced fractured rock mass

ZHANG Wen-quan1, YUAN Jiu-dang1, WANG Zhong-chang2, ZHU Ji-ming1   

  1. 1. College of Mining and Safty Engineering, Shangdong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. School of Civil and Safety Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, Liaoning 116028, China
  • Received:2015-10-01 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472281) and 2017 Key Technologies of Prevention and Control of Serious and Major Accidents in Safety Production (liaoning-0005-2017AQ).

摘要: 根据采动过程中裂隙岩体的应力变化,用法向载荷、剪切载荷和渗透水压分别模拟开采过程中采场的水平应力、垂向应力和水头压力,应用JAM-600型剪切-渗流耦合试验系统对裂隙岩体进行压剪-渗流藕合试验,探讨在恒定法向荷载(CNL)和法向刚度(CNS)条件下,裂隙岩体的法向载荷、裂隙粗糙度与渗透水压对试样的位移、应力和渗流性的影响规律,分析剪切位移大小和岩体裂隙的剪胀特性对裂隙岩体的剪切应力、法向位移、节理水力开度及渗透率影响规律。研究表明:剪切应力和水头压力对裂隙水力开度起促进作用,水平地应力对水力开度变化起抑制作用。随着剪切位移变化,水力开度可分为变小或持平、增大、稳定3个阶段。裂隙表面粗糙度越大,裂隙岩体的刚度越小,则水力开度最终稳定值越大。由于裂隙岩体的剪胀作用渗透率先变小后增大,剪切位移增大,渗透率增大;法向荷载增大,试件的渗透率越小;裂隙表面越粗糙,其渗透率越大,其研究结果可为岩体透水通道形成时的孕育、萌生和爆发的导渗灾变演化过程提供理论基础。

关键词: 采动裂隙, 压剪-渗流耦合, 剪胀, 水力开度, 粗糙度

Abstract: According to the stress variation of fractured rock mass, the horizontal stress, vertical stress and water head pressure of mining stope were simulated by the normal load, shear load, and seepage water pressure during the mining process, respectively. In this study, the compression-shear seepage coupling experiment was conducted by using JAW-600 type shear seepage coupling testing system. Then the effects of normal load of fractured rock mass, roughness of joint, and seepage water pressure on the displacement, stress and permeability of specimens were discussed under the conditions of constant normal load (CNL) and constant normal stiffness (CNS). Besides, the influence laws of the shear displacement and dilatancy properties of fractured rock mass on shear stress, normal displacement, the hydraulic opening of joint and permeability were analyzed as well. It is shown that the hydraulic opening of fractured rock mass was promoted by shear stress and water head pressure, whereas its change was inhibited by the horizontal stress. Moreover, the hydraulic opening was divided into three phases, namely smaller or unchanged phase, increasing phase, stable phase with the change of shear displacement. It is found that the greater final stable value of hydraulic opening depended on the higher roughness of joint and the lower stiffness of fractured rock mass. In addition, the permeability firstly decreased and then increased owing to the dilatancy of fractured rock mass. The permeability increased with the increase of shear displacement and the roughness of joint surface, but decreased with the increase of normal load. Therefore, this study can provide the theoretical basis for the permeable channels, initiation and outbreak of permeability disaster evolution process in fractured rock mass.

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[3] 侯钦宽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 徐敏娜, 曹泽敏. 结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1259-1269.
[4] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[5] 夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱 鑫, 桂 洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗 流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[6] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[7] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[8] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙 渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[9] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[10] 何子露, 刘威, 何思明, 闫帅星, . 饱和松散堆积体快速滑动的剪胀效应 机制与过程模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[11] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[12] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[13] 陆 勇, 周国庆, 杨冬英, 宋家庆, . 砂土剪胀软化、剪缩硬化统一本构的显式计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[14] 董建勋, 刘海笑, 李 洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[15] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!