›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2551-2558.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.011

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载作用下泥炭质土的动变形特性试验研究

黄 娟1,丁祖德2,袁铁映1,赵 丹3,彭立敏1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 昆明理工大学 建筑工程学院,云南 昆明 650500; 3. 长沙市轨道交通集团有限公司,湖南 长沙 410003
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-27 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:黄娟,女,1977年生,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事地下结构施工力学和动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51108461,No.51308270);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2011CB013802)。

Experimental study of dynamic deformation properties of peaty soil under cyclic loading

HUANG Juan1, DING Zu-de 2, YUAN Tie-ying1, ZHAO Dan3, PENG Li-min1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China; 3. Changsha Metro Group Co., Ltd, Changsha, Hunan 410003, China
  • Received:2015-10-27 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51108461, 51308270) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB013802).

摘要: 泥炭质土是一种具有明显区域性的特殊土。通过一系列不同围压、固结比、加载频率等条件下的分级加载动三轴试验,研究了昆明泥炭质土在循环荷载作用下的动变形特性。从动骨干曲线、应力-应变滞回曲线和动弹性模量等方面重点分析了围压、固结比、加载频率对泥炭质土变形特性的影响。试验结果表明:泥炭质土的动应变随动应力幅值非线性增长,且存在某一临界动应力,当动应力幅值达到临界动应力值后,应变急剧增长,土体结构发生破坏;围压对泥炭质土动变形的影响最为显著,固结比次之,加载频率最小;固结比对泥炭质土动变形的影响程度依赖于围压,围压越大,固结比的影响越明显;相同循环振级下,泥炭质土的弹性变形随围压和固结比增大而减小,加载频率愈低,土体的弹性变形愈大;随着循环振次的增加和振级水平的提高,泥炭质土刚度逐渐下降,塑性变形产生并累积增长,围压和固结比越大,加载频率越低,泥炭质土的塑性变形越大。

关键词: 泥炭质土, 变形特性, 动三轴试验, 骨干曲线, 滞回曲线, 动弹性模量

Abstract: The peat soil is a special soil which has obvious regional characteristics. A series of staged cyclic loading triaxial tests is performed to investigate the dynamic deformation properties of the peat soil in Kunming under the conditions of different confining pressures, different consolidation ratios, and different loading frequencies. The effects of confining pressure, consolidation ratio, and loading frequency on the deformation properties of the peat soil subjected to cyclic loading are evaluated through analyzing the dynamic backbone curve, stress-strain hysteretic curve and dynamic elastic modulus. Results show that the dynamic strain of peat soil increases nonlinearly with the dynamic stress amplitude, and there exists a critical stress value at the backbone curve. When the dynamic stress amplitude acting on the soil reaches its critical stress value, the strain of peat soils grows rapidly, and then the soil structure is destroyed; the confining pressure has the most significant effect on the dynamic deformation properties of peat soil, followed by the consolidation ratio, loading frequency is the minimum; the effect of consolidation ratio on the dynamic deformation properties of peat soil depends on the value of confining pressure, which is greater under higher confining pressure; the elastic deformation of peat soil decreases as confining pressure and consolidation ratio increase, while increases as loading frequency decrease, at the same loading level; the stiffness of peat soil decays as loading cycles and loading level increase, the plastic deformation appears and cumulatively grows up; the larger plastic deformation is observed in peat soil with increasing confining pressure and consolidation ratio, decreasing loading frequency.

Key words: peaty soil, deformation properties, dynamic triaxial test, backbone curve, hysteretic curve, dynamic elastic modulus

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[2] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[3] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[4] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[5] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[6] 李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
[7] 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 何 杨, 刘景儒, . 基于相关函数理论的动模量和阻尼比计算新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1368-1376.
[8] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[9] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[10] 周恩全, 王琼, 宗之鑫, 陆建飞. 饱和橡胶砂动力特性动三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3797-3804.
[11] 王道远, 袁金秀, 朱永全, 刘佳, 王洪凡, . 硬塑-流塑浅埋黄土隧道变形特性及合理预留 变形量模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3813-3822.
[12] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[13] 杨圣奇,陆家炜,田文岭,唐劲舟,. 不同节理粗糙度类岩石材料三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 21-32.
[14] 陈瑞锋,田高源,米栋云,董晓强,. 赤泥改性黄土的基本工程性质研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 89-97.
[15] 李 宣, 孙德安,张俊然,. 吸力历史对非饱和粉土动力变形特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2829-2836.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!