›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2574-2582.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑漏气及井阻非线性的真空预压地基固结解析解

黄朝煊1，王正中2，方咏来1   

  1. 1. 浙江省水利水电勘测设计院，浙江 杭州 310002；2. 西北农林科技大学 水利与建筑工程学院，陕西 杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-28 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:黄朝煊，男，1983年生，硕士，高级工程师，主要从事水工结构及岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    浙江省水利水电勘测设计院科标业项目（No.B1608，No.B1609）。

Analytical solution of vacuum preloading foundation considering air leakage and nonlinear well resistance

HUANG Chao-xuan1, WANG Zheng-zhong2, FANG Yong-lai1   

  1. 1. Zhejiang Provincial Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China; 2. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • Received:2015-09-28 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the research Projects of Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power (B1608, B1609).

PDF (Chinese)

500

摘要： 基于径向固结理论和等应变假设，考虑真空预压过程中真空泵故障、漏气等不利影响以及排水体井阻时空非线性影响， 推导了以排水体中超静孔隙水压uw为函数的3阶拟线性偏微分方程，并将膜下真空度随时间的变化曲线作为边界条件，考虑吹填土的自重固结影响，分别给出了真空预压地基考虑漏气影响且排水体渗透系数随深度线性衰减及时间指数衰减时的固结解析解。最后通过与现有多个固结解的对比分析，认为它们一般为新解的特例，并通过算例计算比较分析，认为井阻随时间影响参数A2对固结度的影响比随深度影响参数A1更敏感。当参数A2足够大时，则认为排水体很快就淤堵以至于不具备排水能力，参数A1则可等效反映真空度随深度的衰减影响，且真空预压过程中漏气对地基固结度具有直接影响，漏气越严重则固结排水越慢，需延长真空预压时间，以保证真空预压效果。

关键词: 真空预压, 漏气, 吹填土, 井阻, 超静孔隙水压

Abstract: Based on radial consolidation theory and equal stain assumption, third-order quasilinear partial differential equations for ultra-static pore water pressure of drainage are deduced under cylindrical coordinate system. The equations consider the effects of vacuum pump failure, air leakage, and the spatial and temporal nonlinearity on drainage well resistance. The variation of vacuum degree under film with time is used as a boundary condition, the analytic solutions for consolidation of vacuum preloading foundation under self-weight are derived with the consideration of influence of air leakage and the permeability coefficient of drainage water decreases with depth linear attenuation and time exponential decay. By comparisons, the solutions given by previous studies are found as a special case of the general solution in this article. Through examples, the results show that the well resistance coefficient A2 on the degree of consolidation is sensitive than A1, and the air leakage has a direct impact on the consolidation degree of the foundation in the process of vacuum preloading. The consolidation is slower under serious air leaking conditions. Therefore, the vacuum preloading time should be extended to ensure the vacuum pre-pressure results.

Key words: vacuum preloading, leak, blow fill, well resistance, ultra-static pore water pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[2] 史吏, 胡东东, 蔡袁强, 潘晓东, 孙宏磊, . 增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压 实时响应及加固机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[3] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[4] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[5] 杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹 宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[6] 黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[7] 欧孝夺，潘 鑫，侯凯文，江 杰，柳子炎，. 广西北部湾人造陆域吹填土电冲击特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 348-354.
[8] 柳晓科，鹿 群，路士伟，刘春龙，郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[9] 乐绍林，柏 巍，吴名江，林融冰，陈 进，赵亚峰,. 泥砂互混吹填土自重沉积及颗粒分布规律[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 233-239.
[10] 刘 勇，戚 蓝，李少明，郭浩洋，. 考虑变井阻和涂抹效应的真空预压三维有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1517-1523.
[11] 武亚军，牛 坤，唐海峰，胡志刚，陆逸天，. 药剂真空预压法处理工程废浆中生石灰的增渗作用[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3453-3461.
[12] 刘红军，张 浩，李洪江，尹燕京,. 软黏土中伞式吸力锚基础水平承载有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3325-3331.
[13] 鲍树峰，娄 炎，董志良，牛 飞，谢荣星, . 负压环境下新型地下水位测试装置研发[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3067-3073.
[14] 李 赞 ，雷国辉，付崔伟, . 砂墙地基二维固结自由应变解[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1613-1622.
[15] 闫澍旺 ，李 嘉 ，贾沼霖 ，孙立强 , . 海洋石油平台超长桩拒锤分析及工程实例[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 559-564.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发