›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2583-2588.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.015

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同围压下深井煤岩短时蠕变试验的细观损伤机制分析

刘传孝1, 王 龙2, 张晓雷1, 李茂桐1, 周 桐1   

  1. 1.山东农业大学 水利土木工程学院,山东 泰安 271018; 2. 中国科学院 武汉岩土力学研究所,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-26 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:刘传孝,男,1970年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事非线性动力学、计算力学、岩土工程方向的研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:

    山东省自然科学基金项目(No.ZR2014DM019);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51574156,No.51004098)。

Mesoscopic damage mechanism of coal seam and rock mass in deep field under different confining pressures by short period creep tests

LIU Chuan-xiao1, WANG Long2, ZHANG Xiao-lei1, LI Mao-tong1, ZHOU Tong1   

  1. 1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong 271018, China; 2. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2015-09-26 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014DM019) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574156, 51004098).

摘要: 分析深井煤岩试验断口上矿物、结构、构造等的细观特征,追溯围压对其蠕变损伤机制的影响及调节作用,得到了围压分别为0、10和20 MPa的深井煤岩短时分级加载蠕变试验破坏断口的细观构造,分别对应解理断裂-节理裂隙、沿晶界断裂、沿晶界断裂-穿晶断裂。围压为0 MPa的单轴蠕变试验破坏断口,是煤岩受简单应力环境直接作用的结果,因此,其解理断裂和节理裂隙构造清晰、方向明确、内部新鲜且无夹杂。围压为10 MPa三轴蠕变破坏断口的沿晶界断裂间隙较宽、内部不干净、充填碎屑类夹杂,表明较强环向约束下的晶界较易于克服,且矿物结构以晶粒间的切向运动及力矩作用下的晶粒转动方式调整。围压为20 MPa的三轴蠕变试验,环向强约束使得晶界与晶粒的强度难以克服,最终破坏断口上的沿晶界断裂主要呈现弧形转动,穿晶断裂以剪切位移为主要特征,所以沿晶界断裂构造不太干净、内部充填围压先期作用时原生构造闭合后新产生的少量碎屑类夹杂,穿晶断裂间隙极小、新鲜、干净无夹杂。

关键词: 断口, 细观损伤机制, 围压, 解理断裂, 沿晶断裂, 穿晶断裂

Abstract: This paper is to investigate mesoscopic features of coal seam and rock mass in the deep field, which includes the mineral, configuration, and structure of the fractured surface of specimens. The effect of confining pressure on creep damage mechanism and its regulation were also studied. Under short period creep loading, the observed mesoscopic features were classified into cleavage fracture-joint fractures, intergranular fracture, and intergranular-transgranular fractures under confining pressures of 0, 10, and 20 MPa, respectively. Under the confining pressure of 0 MPa (i.e., the uniaxial creep test), the failure fracture was caused by the simple stress acting on coal seam and rock masses directly. As a result, its cleavage fracture and joint fissure had distinct structure, clear orientation, and fresh interior without inclusions. Under the confining pressure of 10 MPa, the interface of intergranular fracture was found to be relatively wide, and the interior was not clear and filled with inclusions. It indicated that the grain boundary was easily broken under the higher confining pressure, and the mineral structure was changed by adjusting both the tangential movement among grains and the grain rotation under the action of torque. Under the confining pressure of 20 MPa, since the grain boundary was restricted and grain itself was difficult to be destroyed, the ultimate destruction of the fracture along the grain boundary fracture mainly showed the arc rotation. Besides, the siginificant feature of transgranular fractures was characterized by the shear displacement. Under strong restrictions, intergranular fracture structure was not clean and filled with little new inclusion caused by the earlier period of confining pressure. In contrast, the transgranular fracture was tiny, fresh, and pure without inclusions.

Key words: fracture, mesoscopic damage mechanism, confining pressure, cleavage fracture, intergranular fracture, transgranular fracture

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[2] 李宗泽, 姜德义, 范金洋, 陈 结, 刘 伟, 吴 斐, 杜 超, 康燕飞. 盐岩三轴间隔疲劳特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
[3] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[4] 范运辉, 朱其志, 倪涛, 张坤, 张振南, . 基于弹性张量离散化的脆延转变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 181-188.
[5] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
[6] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙 渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[7] 马德鹏, 周岩, 刘传孝, 商岩冬, . 不同卸围压速率下煤样卸荷破坏能量演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2645-2652.
[8] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[9] 周 辉, 宋 明, 张传庆, 卢景景, 刘振江, 史林肯, . 水平层状复合岩体变形破坏特征的围压效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 465-473.
[10] 李晓照, 邵珠山, 戚承志, . 岩石裂纹损伤及围压对剪切破坏影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4249-4258.
[11] 杨小彬, 程虹铭, 吕嘉琦, 侯鑫, 聂朝刚, . 三轴循环荷载下砂岩损伤耗能比演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3751-3757.
[12] 黄珏皓, 陈 健, 孔令智, 刘府生, 柯文汇, 邱岳峰, 李健斌, . 考虑循环围压与振动频率影响的 饱和软黏土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 173-182.
[13] 王鹏飞, 李长洪, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.
[14] 盛云锋, 陈 远, 周 伟, 马 刚, 常晓林, . 基于改进动剪切模量模型的堆石坝动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 405-414.
[15] 张天军,尚宏波,李树刚,魏文伟,包若羽,潘红宇,. 三轴应力下不同粒径破碎砂岩渗透特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2361-2370.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!