›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2589-2596.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.016

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

吹填泥浆固化及长期力学性能试验研究

杨爱武,钟晓凯,梁 超, 李 岩   

  1. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-18 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:杨爱武,男,1971年生,博士,教授,从事软土地基处理及土体微观结构方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41372291);天津市科技计划项目(No.15JCZDJC40600,No.15ZCZDSF00220,No.13JCZDJC35500)。

Experiment study of solidification performance and long-term mechanical properties of dredger filled mud

YANG Ai-wu¬, ZHONG Xiao-kai, LIANG Chao, LI Yan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Characteristics and Engineering Environment of Tianjin, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2016-03-18 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Program of National Science Foundation of China (41372291) and the Tianjin Science and Technology Program (15JCZDJC40600, 15ZCZDSF00220, 13JCZDJC35500).

摘要: 利用粉末固化剂对天津滨海新区高含水率吹填泥浆进行固化试验,分析了含水率、龄期、固化剂掺量对吹填泥浆固化土强度的影响,基于试验结果确定了满足强度要求且经济合理的固化剂掺量为3%。以养护60 d的泥浆固化土无侧限抗压强度为基准,建立了无侧限抗压强度随水灰比和龄期变化的预测公式。通过三轴蠕变试验,对含水率为160%、养护28 d的泥浆固化土进行了长期特性分析,发现其蠕变特征与结构性软黏土接近,并利用等时曲线确定了其长期强度,在此基础上求得泥浆固化土在长期荷载作用下的抗剪强度指标,为吹填固化土的安全应用提供理论支持。

关键词: 吹填泥浆, 固化土, 强度预测, 长期强度

Abstract: Solidification tests were performed on dredger fill mud with high moisture content in Binhai New Area of Tianjin using the powder curing agent. The effects of moisture content, curing time, and curing agent content on the strength of solidified soils were analyzed. The test results show that the most appropriate curing agent content is 3% considering the strength demand of economic rationality. The unconfined compressive strength with the curing duration of 60 days was defined as a benchmark. An equation for predicting unconfined compressive strength of the solidified soils was proposed using two variables, i.e., water cement ratio and curing time. The long-term strength properties of solidified soils with the moisture content of 160% and the age of 28 days were analyzed by the triaxial rheological tests. The test results show that the solidified soils present similar creep behaviors to the structural soft clays. Meanwhile, the long-term strength of solidified soils can be determined using the isochronous curve. The shear strength indexes under long-term loads can also be determined, providing theoretical support for the security applications of solidified soils.

Key words: dredger filled mud, solidified soil, strength prediction, long-term strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[2] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
[3] 朱赛楠, 殷跃平, 李 滨, . 二叠系炭质页岩软弱夹层剪切蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1377-1386.
[4] 杨秀荣, 姜谙男, 王善勇, 张峰瑞, . 冻融循环条件下片麻岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4331-4340.
[5] 杨爱武,胡 垚. 新型城市污泥固化土工程特性及微观机理[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 69-78.
[6] 韩智铭,乔春生,朱 举. 含两组交叉贯通节理岩体的强度及破坏特征分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2451-2460.
[7] 许宏发,柏 准,齐亮亮,耿汉生,马林建,刘 斌, . 基于全应力-应变曲线的软岩蠕变寿命估计[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1973-1980.
[8] 陈国庆,郭 帆,王剑超,周玉新,. 冻融后石英砂岩三轴蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 203-210.
[9] 刘秀敏,蒋玄苇,陈从新,夏开宗,周意超,宋许根, . 天然与饱水状态下石膏岩蠕变试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 277-283.
[10] 张强勇,张龙云,向 文,江力宇,丁炎志,. 考虑温度效应的片麻状花岗岩三轴蠕变试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2507-2514.
[11] 刘清秉,王 顺,夏冬生,项 伟,苏爱军,王菁莪,刘 晓,. 残余强度状态下原状滑带土蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1305-1313.
[12] 贺智强,樊恒辉,王军强,刘 刚,王中妮,余佳辉,. 木质素加固黄土的工程性能试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 731-739.
[13] 刘晋铭,欧忠文,肖寒冰,莫金川,杨康辉. 功能组分对固化土早期强度的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 755-761.
[14] 孙淼军,唐辉明,王潇弘,胡新丽,汪明元,倪卫达,. 蠕动型滑坡滑带土蠕变特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 385-391.
[15] 巨能攀,黄海峰,郑 达,周 新,张成强. 考虑含水率的红层泥岩蠕变特性及改进伯格斯模型[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 67-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!