›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 2826-2832.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

分段锚预应力锚杆加固围岩力学分析

顾士坦1, 2,胡成成1, 2,戴华宾1, 2,严超超1, 2   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地, 山东 青岛 266590; 2. 山东科技大学 矿业与安全工程学院, 山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-17 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 胡成成,男,1990年生,硕士,主要研究方向为冲击地压。E-mail: 1426626151@qq.com E-mail: tsgst@163.com
  • 作者简介:顾士坦,男,1978年生,副教授,博士后,主要从事矿山压力、巷道支护等方面的研究和教学工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0801403);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51374140,No. 51204102)

Mechanical analysis of surrounding rock reinforced by prestressed bolt with subsection anchor

GU Shi-tan1, 2, HU Cheng-cheng1, 2, DAI Hua-bin 1, 2, YAN Chao-chao1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. College of Mining and Safety Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2017-01-17 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the State Key Research Development Program of China (2016YFC0801403) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374140, 51204102).

摘要: 基于端锚锚杆支护的优越性和围岩破坏分区及破坏深度逐步向深部发展的规律,针对煤矿深部巷道采用加长或全长锚固锚杆支护时,锚杆的锚固段整体受力不均,抗剪切承载能力低,而端锚锚杆无法适应其大变形缺点的问题,建立了两段锚预应力锚杆支护模型。运用理论计算和数值模拟的手段研究了两段锚预应力锚杆锚固段的受力特征和承载能力,并进行了算例对比分析。结果表明:两段锚分区锚固的支护方式明显改变了加长或全长锚固锚杆锚固段的剪应力曲线变化趋势,使原本呈负指数变化趋势的剪应力曲线变得平缓,提高了锚杆锚固段的剪切承载能力;在相同预紧力作用下,与端锚锚杆相比,明显降低了锚杆锚固段的荷载和剪切应力;在不同预紧力下,两段锚预应力锚杆的两锚固段可分别起到围岩不同变形时期端锚锚杆的支护作用,继续发挥端锚支护的优越性。

关键词: 受力不均, 两段锚预应力锚杆, 加固围岩, 剪应力曲线

Abstract: In this study, a model for a pre-stressed bolt with two anchorage segments was established, by considering both the superiority of point-anchoring bolts and the laws of destruction partitioning and gradually destructive depth development. The model is basically used to solve the following problems. When lengthening-anchoring or fully-anchoring bolts were applied in the deep roadway, the anchorage segments of the anchor was not as uniform as the whole, and the shear capacity was low. While point-anchoring bolts could not adapt to the large deformation. Afterwards the stress characteristics and bearing capacity of two anchorage segments were studied using theoretical calculations and numerical simulations. Moreover, a comparative analysis was also provided in this study. The results show that the bolt with two anchorage segments obviously changes the shear stress curve of the lengthening-anchoring or fully-anchoring bolts, which turns the trend of the original negative exponent into the gentle. Its shear bearing capacity is also improved by the partition supporting pattern with two anchorage segments. Under the conditions of the same pre-stressed force, the load and shear stress of the anchoring section are obviously lower than that of point-anchoring bolts. Under different pre-stressed conditions, these two anchorage sections are separately used as the supporting function of point-anchoring bolts according to various periods of surrounding rock deformation, which continues to show the superiority of point-anchoring bolts.

Key words: non-uniform stress, prestressed bolt with two anchorage segments, reinforcement of surrounding rock, shear stress curve

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 郭 亮,胡卸文,李晓昭,巫锡勇,吴礼舟,李 煜,罗 刚,马洪生,. 花岗岩断裂带原状裂隙岩水力特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3937-3948.
[2] 张希巍,王 刚,蔡 明,徐 荃,. 凌海花岗岩变形特点与脆性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3515-3524.
[3] 陈 松,乔春生,叶 青,邓 斌. 基于摩尔-库仑准则的断续节理岩体复合损伤本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3612-3622.
[4] 李术才,潘东东,许振浩,李利平,林 鹏,袁永才,高成路,路 为, . 承压型隐伏溶洞突水灾变演化过程模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3164-3173.
[5] 左宇军,孙文吉斌,邬忠虎,许云飞,. 渗透压–应力耦合作用下页岩渗透性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3253-3260.
[6] 王凤云,钱德玲. 基于切向应变软化的深埋圆形隧道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3313-3320.
[7] 郑安兴,罗先启,. 危岩水力劈裂分析的扩展有限元法[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3461-3468.
[8] 傅 晏,袁 文,刘新荣,缪露莉,谢文博,. 酸性干湿循环作用下砂岩强度参数劣化规律[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3331-3339.
[9] 刘泉声,彭星新,黄 兴,雷广峰,魏 莱,刘 鹤,. 全断面隧道掘进机护盾受力监测及卡机预警[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3406-3414.
[10] 李小飞,孙江涛,陈卫忠,袁敬强,刘金泉,张庆艳,. 纤维硅灰水泥石强度与浆液抗冲刷特性[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3157-3163.
[11] 李东奇,李宗利,吕从聪. 考虑裂隙附加水压的岩体断裂强度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3174-3180.
[12] 吴永胜,谭忠盛,余贤斌,喻 渝,朱 勇,. 不同加载方位角下单轴压缩千枚岩扩容特性[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2747-2754.
[13] 李 杨,佘成学. 堆石料单粒强度尺寸效应的颗粒流模拟方法研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2951-2959.
[14] 李 帅,朱万成,牛雷雷,李如飞,李少华. 动态扰动对应力松弛岩石变形行为影响的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2795-2804.
[15] 王斐笠,王述红,修占国. 应力波扰动下结构面的应力量化及强度表征[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2844-2850.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!