›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 2847-2854.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.010

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

荆门石膏矿岩遇水软化力学特性试验研究

周意超1, 2,陈从新1,刘秀敏1,潘玉丛1,夏开宗1,蒋玄苇1   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071 2.长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙,410076
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-18 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:周意超,女,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡工程和地下工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51274188)。

Experimental study on mechanical properties of water-softening gypsum rock in Jingmen

ZHOU Yi-chao1, 2, CHEN Cong-xin1, LIU Xiu-min1, PAN Yu-cong1, XIA Kai-zong1, JIANG Xuan-wei1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410076, China
  • Received:2016-01-18 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51274188).

摘要: 针对荆门市荆花石膏矿中留作矿柱的新鲜石膏岩进行天然和饱水两种状态下的单轴和三轴压缩试验,结合微观扫描电镜试验,研究石膏岩的强度和变形软化特性及机制。结果表明:石膏岩遇水会发生显著的强度和变形软化。随溶液中SO42-、Ca2+浓度不同,强度软化系数在0.6~0.72之间,弹性模量软化系数在0.66~0.75之间,凝聚力c显著下降而内摩擦角? 基本保持不变。石膏岩具有良好的延性,天然状态下峰后应变软化转为理想塑性变形的临界围压在2.5~5.0 MPa之间,经饱水软化后临界转换围压低于2.5 MPa。石膏岩遇水软化机制与其主要矿物成分二水硫酸钙的微溶性质密切相关。在蒸馏水中,石膏岩主要因溶解造成矿物流失,弱化内部结构而软化;在硫酸钙饱和溶液中,石膏矿物溶解-重结晶的动态平衡改变了岩石内部结构,使其疏松化,造成其力学性质发生软化。试验结果加深了对石膏岩遇水软化力学特性的认识,对石膏矿采空区稳定性分析具有重要意义。

关键词: 石膏岩, 饱水, 软化机制, 力学特性, 溶解, 重结晶

Abstract: Under nature and saturated conditions, a series of uniaxial and triaxial compression tests was conducted on gypsum rock mined from Jinghua mine in Jingmen. Mechanical properties of water-softening gypsum rock and the corresponding softening mechanism were studied by the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results show that the strength and deformational properties of gypsum rock are tremendously weakened by water. With different concentrations of SO42- and Ca2+ in the solution, the softening coefficient of rock strength ranges from 0.6 to 0.72 and the softening coefficient of elastic modulus is in the range of 0.66-0.75. Besides, the cohesion c decreases significantly whereas the internal friction angle ? remains essentially unchanged. Since the gypsum rock has good ductility, the critical confining pressure of the elastic deformation to the ideal plastic deformation is found between 2.5 MPa and 5 MPa in nature sate, while the critical confining pressure is lower than 2.5 MPa for saturated gypsum rock. The softening mechanism of gypsum rock is closely related to the slight solubility of the calcium sulphate dehydrate, which is the major ingredient of rock. In distilled water, the rock structure is weakened by the dissolution process of gypsum mineral. In saturated CaSO4 solution, the dynamic equilibrium state reaches when the dissolution rate is equal to the re-crystallization rate. The continuous dissolution and re-crystallization processes tend to gradually loosen the original tight structure, resulting in softening mechanical properties. In conclusion, this study provides deep insights into the transformation process of the mechanical properties of the gypsum rock in accordance with different solutions and confining pressures, which is of great significance for the stability analysis of goaf area in gypsum mines.

Key words: gypsum rock, water-saturated condition, softening mechanism, mechanical properties, dissolution, recrystallization

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[2] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[3] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[4] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[5] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[6] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[7] 王冲, 胡大伟, 任金明, 周辉, 卢景景, 刘传新, . 侵蚀性环境对地下结构渗透和力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
[8] 罗丹旎, 苏国韶, 何保煜, . 不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[9] 丛 怡, 丛 宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
[10] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[11] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 汪勇, 王昊, 刘旭亮, . 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性 及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4156.
[12] 郭孔灵, 杨磊, 盛祥超, 梅洁, 李邦翔, 张波, 杨为民, 宋光啸, . 水力耦合作用下含三维裂隙类岩石材料的 破裂力学行为及声发射特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4380-4390.
[13] 周科平, 刘 维, 周彦龙, 林 允, 薛 轲. 不同渗透力的类充填体力学特性及损伤软化 本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3724-3732.
[14] 宋宏芳, 岳祖润, 李佰林, 张松, . 季节冻土区高速铁路防冻胀路基保温强化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4041-4048.
[15] 朱振南, 田 红, 董楠楠, 窦 斌, 陈 劲, 张 宇, 王炳红, . 高温花岗岩遇水冷却后物理力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 169-176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!