五星形桩截面尺寸优化及竖向承载机制试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.011

›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 2855-2864.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.011

五星形桩截面尺寸优化及竖向承载机制试验研究

任连伟¹，詹俊峰¹，杨权威¹，王新泉²，张敏霞¹

1. 河南理工大学土木工程学院，河南焦作 454000；2. 浙江大学城市学院土木工程系，浙江杭州 310015）

收稿日期:2016-02-14 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
作者简介:任连伟，男，1980年生，博士，副教授，主要从事地基与基础相关的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No. 51508166)；河南省教育厅科技攻关项目(No. 14A560015)。

Section optimization and model test study on bearing mechanisms of five-star-shaped pile

REN Lian-wei¹, ZHAN Jun-feng¹, YANG Quan-wei¹, WANG Xin-quan², ZHANG Min-xia¹

1. School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China

Received:2016-02-14 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508166) and the Science and Technology Project of the Education Department of Henan Province (14A560015).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 五星形混凝土桩是一种新型截面异形桩，由圆截面均匀内切5个圆弧形成，其截面参数主要有被切割圆半径R、切割圆半径r、切割圆弧所对应的外包圆圆心角2x、外包圆弧对应圆心角θ。经截面尺寸优化分析，推导出周长最大化五星形桩和周长面积比最大化五星形桩。为进一步掌握五星形桩承载性能，以砂雨法制作土样，在干砂中进行了4根单桩对比模型试验研究，4根单桩为：周长面积比最大化五星形桩F2、周长最大化五星形桩F1、与F2等截面周长圆桩C1、与F2等截面面积圆桩C2。试验结果表明：与F1相比，F2的桩侧表面积与其相近，极限承载力大致相同，但F2混凝土用量是F1混凝土用量的0.75倍，单位体积混凝土承载力更高，F2为最优的截面尺寸；与等截面面积小圆桩C2相比，F2桩侧表面积是其1.53倍，极限承载力是其2.4倍，显示出在相同混凝土用量下五星形桩F2具有良好的承载性能，截面异性扩大效应明显；与相同截面周长的大圆桩C1相比，F2桩截面面积是其0.44倍，极限承载力是其0.96倍，但F2桩单位体积混凝土承载力是C1桩的2.21倍，显示出更高的承载性价比。各级荷载作用下五星形桩侧摩阻力所占比例在80%以上，特别是F2桩，在90%以上，表现出摩擦桩的特性。研究成果可对五星形桩的工程应用提供一定理论支持。

关键词: 五星形桩, 截面尺寸优化, 承载机制, 模型试验, 砂雨法

Abstract: The five-star-shaped concrete pile is a new type of pile with a special shaped cross-section. It is formed by cutting five circular arcs in a circle pile. The main parameters of the cross section include the radius of the circumcircle R and the corresponding circumcircle central angle θ, the radius of inward cutting circular arc r and the corresponding circumcircle central angle 2x. Through the optimization analysis of the section size, the maximum of the circumference of the five-star-shaped piles and a maximum ratio of perimeter to the area of five-star-shaped piles are derived. To further explore the vertical bearing capacity of five-star-shaped piles, experimental studies are carried out on the comparison of four single piles in the dry sand by the sand pouring method. These four single piles are the maximum ratio of perimeter to the area of the five-star-shaped pile F1, the maximum of the circumference of the five star-shaped pile F2, the round pile C1 with the same perimeter of F2, and round pile C2 with the same cross-sectional area of F2. The following conclusions are drawn from this study. The side surface area of F2 gets close to that of F1, and the ultimate bearing capacity is approximately the same. The concrete dosage of F2 is 0.75 times that of F1, the bearing capacity per concrete is higher, and thus F2 is optimal cross-sectional pile. Compared with C2, the side surface area of F2 is 1.53 times that of C2, and the ultimate bearing capacity of F2 is 2.4 times that of C2. It shows that F2 has better bearing capacity than that the same amount of concrete, and the expansion effect of cross-section is obvious. Compared with C1, F2 pile cross section area is 0.44 times that of C1, the ultimate bearing capacity is 0.96 times that of C1, and the unit volume concrete bearing capacity of F2 pile is 2.21 times that of C1, which exhibits higher load cost performance. At all levels of load, the ratio of the lateral friction of the five star-shaped piles is more than 80%, especially F2, and the proportion of side friction resistance is above 90%, which shows the characteristics of friction pile. This study provides theoretical support for the engineering application of five-star-shaped piles.

Key words: five-star-shaped pile, section optimisation, bearing mechanism, model test, sand pour method

中图分类号:

TU 473.1

任连伟，詹俊峰，杨权威，王新泉，张敏霞，. 五星形桩截面尺寸优化及竖向承载机制试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2855-2864.

REN Lian-wei, ZHAN Jun-feng, YANG Quan-wei, WANG Xin-quan, ZHANG Min-xia，. Section optimization and model test study on bearing mechanisms of five-star-shaped pile[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2855-2864.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2]	张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3]	黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4]	邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5]	程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6]	史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7]	宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8]	蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9]	刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[10]	汤明高, 李松林, 许强, 龚正峰, 祝权, 魏勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[11]	宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12]	米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13]	侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[14]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15]	陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

五星形桩截面尺寸优化及竖向承载机制试验研究

Section optimization and model test study on bearing mechanisms of five-star-shaped pile

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0