›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 2957-2961.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.024

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

主动围压状态人工冻结砂土SHPB试验与分析

马冬冬1, 2,马芹永1, 2,袁 璞1, 2,姚兆明1, 2   

  1. 1. 安徽理工大学 矿山地下工程教育部工程研究中心,安徽 淮南 232001;2. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-24 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 马芹永,男,1964年生,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事冻土力学与工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: qymaah@126.com E-mail: dongdonm@126.com
  • 作者简介:马冬冬,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事冻土动力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.50874003);安徽理工大学研究生创新基金(No.2017CX1001).

SHPB tests on artificial frozen sand and its analysis under active confining pressure

MA Dong-dong1, 2, MA Qin-yong1, 2, YUAN Pu1, 2, YAO Zhao-ming1, 2   

  1. 1. Engineering Research Center of Underground Mine Construction of Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2016-05-24 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50874003) and the Innovation Fund for Graduate Students of Anhui University of Science and Technology (2017CX1001).

摘要: 为研究主动围压状态人工冻结砂土的动态力学性能,利用直径50 mm变截面分离式霍普金森压杆试验装置,以取自山东济宁某矿-94.52 m处冻结砂土为研究对象,对长径比为0.5的冻结砂土试件进行主动围压状态下的冲击压缩试验,分析了主动围压和应变率对冻结砂土动态力学性能的影响。研究结果表明,无围压状态下,冻结砂土动态应力-应变曲线可分为弹性阶段、塑性阶段、黏性阶段和破坏阶段,冻结砂土呈脆性破坏;主动围压状态下,应力-应变曲线塑性阶段明显增长,无黏性阶段,冻结砂土呈微裂破坏。相同条件下,主动围压状态下冻结砂土的动态抗压强度均高于无围压状态,且随着围压的增大,动态抗压强度逐渐增大;当应变率为220 s-1,温度为-15 ℃时,主动围压为0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0 MPa的动态抗压强度为无围压状态下的119%、140%、158%和181%。不同主动围压下的应力-应变曲线表现出汇聚现象,汇聚点趋向于无围压状态。冻结砂土的动态抗压强度随应变率的提高而增加。

关键词: 冻土力学, 冻结砂土, 分离式霍普金森压杆(SHPB), 主动围压, 应变率

Abstract: Dynamic compression tests were carried out to investigate dynamic properties of artificial frozen sand under active confining pressure. In the experiments, a variable cross-section split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus with a diameter of 50 mm was employed. Frozen sand was sampled from -94.52 m level at a coalmine in Jining, Shandong province, and the ratio of length to diameter of the cylindrical frozen sand specimen was 0.5. The influence of confining pressure and strain rate on dynamic properties for artificial frozen sand was analyzed as well. The results show that under uniaxial loading condition, the stress-strain curve can be divided into four stages, i.e., elastic stage, plastic stage, viscous stage and failure stage. Moreover, the corresponding failure mode is brittle. However, under confining pressure, the plastic stage has been extended, there is no viscous stage and crack failure occurred. Dynamic compressive strength of artificial frozen sand under confining pressure is greater than that under uniaxial loading condition, and increases with the increase of confining pressure. When the strain rate is 220 s-1 and the temperature is -15 ℃, under the confining pressures of 0.5 MPa, 1.0 MPa, 1.5 MPa and 2.0 MPa, dynamic compressive strengths are 1.19, 1.40, 1.58 and 1.81 times that under uniaxial loading condition, respectively. Strain convergence phenomenon occurs under different confining pressure conditions, and the convergence position tends to uniaxial loading condition. The dynamic compressive strength increased with the increase of strain rate.

Key words: frozen soil mechanics, frozen sand, split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), confining pressure, strain rate

中图分类号: 

  • TU 445

[1] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[2] 王 腾, 吴 瑞. 黏土中海底管线竖向贯入阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 871-878.
[3] 高 峰, 熊 信, 周科平, 李杰林, 史文超, . 冻融循环作用下饱水砂岩的强度劣化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 926-932.
[4] 马林建, 李增, 罗棕木, 魏厚振, 段力群, . 珊瑚颗粒力学特性应变率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4637-4643.
[5] 黄珏皓, 陈 健, 孔令智, 刘府生, 柯文汇, 邱岳峰, 李健斌, . 考虑循环围压与振动频率影响的 饱和软黏土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 173-182.
[6] 孟庆山, 范 超, 曾卫星, 余克服, . 南沙群岛珊瑚礁灰岩的动态力学性能试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 183-190.
[7] 赵武胜,陈卫忠,马少森,赵 坤,宋万鹏,李 灿,. 泡沫混凝土隧道减震层减震机制[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1027-1036.
[8] 向 鹏,纪洪广,蔡美峰,张月征. 抛掷型岩爆震源体能量动态释放机制与几何尺度特征[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 457-466.
[9] 周恩全, 朱晓冬, 陆建飞, 王炳辉, . 液化后砂土流体特性测试装置的研发及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4698-4706.
[10] 马林建,阳 发,王明洋,李 増,. 考虑应变率效应的广义Hoek-Brown动态强度准则[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 27-32.
[11] 刘俊新,张 可,刘 伟,施锡林,. 不同围压及应变速率下页岩变形及破损特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 43-52.
[12] 陈乐求,张家生,陈俊桦,陈积光,. 水泥改良泥质板岩粗粒土的静动力特性试验[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1903-1910.
[13] 杜海民,马 巍,张淑娟,周志伟. 三轴循环加卸载条件下高含冰冻结砂土变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1675-1681.
[14] 李光雷,蔚立元,靖洪文,苏海健,张 涛,李 明,. 酸腐蚀后灰岩动态压缩力学性质的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3247-3254.
[15] 柯文汇,陈 健,盛 谦,黄珏皓,. 结构性软黏土时效特性的一维弹黏塑性模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2561-2568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!