›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 3000-3008.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.029

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑滑床复合倾斜岩体综合地基系数的抗滑桩受力特征研究

董曼曼,王亮清,葛云峰,王 聪   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-18 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 王亮清,男,1972年生,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性与地质灾害防治的教学与科研工作。E-mail: wlq027@126.com E-mail:602921903@qq.com
  • 作者简介:董曼曼,女,1992年生,硕士,主要从事岩土工程和防灾减灾方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41372310);中国博士后科学基金项目(No. 2015M570671)。

Mechanical characteristics of anti-sliding pile considering comprehensive foundation coefficient of sliding bed on composite inclined rock mass

DONG Man-man, WANG Liang-qing, GE Yun-feng, WANG Cong   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2016-06-18 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372310) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570671).

摘要: 在抗滑桩内力与变形计算中,当前理论分析多将滑床岩体等效成均质体或水平的非均质体,而三峡库区大部分滑床多为复合倾斜岩体。通过3DEC数值试验,研究了抗滑桩的有效影响范围与桩截面宽度、深度的关系,确定了抗滑桩有效影响范围的上、下限;利用面积等效,在桩的有效影响范围内提出了滑床复合倾斜岩体综合地基系数KZi的公式;推导了基于KZi的弹性抗滑桩嵌固段受力特征研究的计算公式并编写了MATLAB计算程序。以马家沟滑坡为例,采用等效法、水平层状地基系数法和基于KZi的计算方法分别进行了抗滑桩嵌固段内力、位移的计算。结果表明,基于KZi的计算方法与水平层状地基系数法相比,滑面处位移增大14.6%,内力相差较小;同时,基于KZi的计算方法根据滑动面处的位移反求桩顶的位移与现场监测位移较为接近,而利用传统方法计算位移偏小,设计偏于危险。该方法可为复合倾斜岩体地区的抗滑桩设计提供理论支撑。

关键词: 滑床倾斜岩体, 抗滑桩, 影响范围, 综合地基系数, 内力与变形

Abstract: In the existing theoretical analysis, laminar rock mass of sliding bed is normally equivalent to homogeneous or horizontal non-homogeneous body for calculations of the internal forces and deformation on the anti-sliding pile. However, most of slide beds in Three Gorges reservoir area are composite inclined rock mass. Firstly, numerical simulations using the 3DEC software were conducted to examine the relationships of the effective scope of the anti-sliding pile with the cross-section width and depth of pile. The upper and lower limits of the effective scopes of the pile were determined. Secondly, a formula was developed for the comprehensive foundation coefficient (KZi) of sliding bed on composite inclined rock mass within the effective scope of pile by the area equivalent. Finally, several formulas of internal forces and displacement considering KZi, were deduced on the elastic anti-sliding pile. Moreover, correspondingly MATLAB calculation programs were compiled. Taking the Majiagou landslide as an example, the internal forces and displacement of anti-sliding pile under the sliding surface were calculated by the equivalent method, the horizontal layer foundation coefficient method and KZi-based method, respectively. Comparisons between the KZi-based method and the horizontal layer foundation coefficient method show that the displacement of sliding surface by the former is greater than that of the latter (14.6%) and the difference of internal force is negligible. According to the displacement of sliding surface, the displacement of pile top calculated by the KZi-based method is similar with that of field monitoring, while it is smaller by a conventional method and dangerous for design. Thus, the KZi-based method can provide theoretical support for the area of composite inclined rock mass on the design of anti-sliding piles.

Key words: sliding bed on composite inclined rock mass, anti-sliding pile, effective scope, comprehensive foundation coefficient, internal forces and deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[2] 王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的 影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[3] 陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[4] 魏少伟, 隋颜阳, 杨建民, . 圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 951-961.
[5] 张玲, 陈金海, 赵明华. 考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[6] 雷 达, 蒋关鲁, 孙圣杰, 戚志慧, 李安洪, . 基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 127-134.
[7] 马显春, 罗 刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[8] 朱顺然,徐 超,丁金华,. 土工织物-砂土界面的叠环式剪切试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1775-1780.
[9] 毛坚强,徐 骏,杨 磊,. 滑体段采用m法模型的抗滑桩计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1197-1202.
[10] 储召军,石少卿,孙建虎,李 季,崔廉明,. 基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 848-853.
[11] 郑 桐,刘红帅,袁晓铭,涂杰文,汤爱平,齐文浩,. 悬臂抗滑桩静、动力学性能试验的全过程[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 854-862.
[12] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
[13] 付 晓,张建经,周立荣,. 多级框架锚索和抗滑桩联合作用下边坡抗震性能的振动台试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 462-470.
[14] 尹 静,邓荣贵,王金梅,王园园,李凯甜,. 锚索抗滑桩内力计算的传递矩阵法[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3517-3523.
[15] 范志强,唐辉明,汪丁建,刘 凯,温 韬. 考虑土体应变软化特性的滑坡抗滑桩设计推力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 665-672.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!