›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 3039-3047.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.033

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究

曾超峰1, 2, 3,薛秀丽1,郑 刚2   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300072;3. 广西大学 工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-05 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 薛秀丽,女,1986年生,博士,讲师,从事固体力学方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: xlxue@hnust.edu.cn E-mail:cfzeng@hnust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:曾超峰,男,1987年生,博士后,讲师,硕士生导师,从事岩土工程方面的科研与教学工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51308209, No. 51578164, No. 51708206, No. 11602083);湖南省自然科学基金项目(No. 2016JJ6044);湖南省教育厅项目(No. 15C0557)。

Effect of soil permeability on wall deflection during pre-excavation dewatering in soft ground

ZENG Chao-feng1, 2, 3, XUE Xiu-li1, ZHENG Gang2   

  1. 1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structural Safety of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2016-09-05 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308209, 51578164, 51708206, 11602083), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2016JJ6044) and the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (15C0557).

摘要: 最新工程案例表明,在基坑开挖前,现场预降水可引起支护墙发生显著初始侧移。依托工程实测资料,建立并验证了数值分析模型,通过一系列参数分析研究了软土地基渗透性条件对基坑开挖前预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响规律及机制。结果表明,基坑预降水深度范围内土层渗透系数越大,渗透性各向异性越明显;在相同的预降水时间内,被降水土层中将会发生更大程度的孔隙水压力减小;在更强的墙-土界面总压力重分布下,预降水引起的支护墙侧移更大。预降水过程中支护墙侧移沿深度的分布范围与预降水深度底部及其以下土层渗透性有关,若为渗透性较差的深厚弱透水层,则当预降水深度位置不超过0.5倍该弱透水层厚度位置时,支护墙侧移将主要发生在预降水深度范围内;若为渗透性较好的透水层,预降水引起的支护墙侧移深度范围可能达到该层以下的另一弱透水层单元位置处。另外,当预降水深度底端紧邻透水性较好土层时,再增大预降水深度会引起支护墙发生较大增量的侧移,此时,应严防“超降”;当预降水深度底面以下为深厚弱透水层时,再增大预降水深度引起的支护墙侧移增量并不明显。

关键词: 深基坑预降水, 支护墙侧移, 软土地基, 有限元计算, 土层渗透性

Abstract: Recently, field data shows that considerable wall deflection can be induced by pre-excavation dewatering. A numerical model was established and verified based on field data, and a parametric study was carried out to investigate the effect of soil permeability on wall deflection. The results indicate that the wall deflection, in a prescribed dewatering time, will be more obvious with the better soil permeability, the larger anisotropy coefficient of soil permeability within the dewatering depth. That is because, in this case, greater pore pressure decrease will appear at the soil layers, and larger total stress redistribution will appear at the soil-wall interface. Moreover, the depth of wall deflection has relation with the permeability of soil below the bottom of dewatering depth. If the soil below the bottom of dewatering depth is aquiclude and the center of the aquiclude thickness is deeper than the dewatering depth, the wall deflection will roughly appear within the dewatering depth. If the soil below the bottom of dewatering depth is well-drained soils, the wall deflection may reach the location of another aquiclude below the well-drained soils. Besides, when dewatering wells enter the well-drained soils, greater deflection increment will occur with the dewatering depth increase, and over dewatering should be avoided strictly. However, when thick and poorly drained soils appear below the bottom of dewatering depth, wall deflection increment induced by increasing dewatering depth is not apparent.

Key words: pre-excavation dewatering of deep foundation pit, wall deflection, soft ground, finite element calculation, soil permeability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 46+3

[1] 王之东, 黎立云, 陈 滔, 刘兵权, . 矿柱岩爆模型试验中能量释放研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[2] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[3] 周雄雄, 迟世春, 贾宇峰, 谢芸菲, . 高土石坝填筑过程的精细化模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 443-450.
[4] 汪益敏,闫 岑,于 恒,李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[5] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[6] 肖 忠,王 琰,王元战,刘 莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[7] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,顾明芬,陆湛秋,. 软土地基刚柔性桩水平承载位移控制标准研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2676-2682.
[8] 焉 振,王元战,. 考虑软基不排水强度循环弱化的格型钢板桩防波堤动力有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1454-1462.
[9] 肖 忠,葛博睿,王元战,王 琰, . 十字形内隔板对桶形基础各单向承载力和破坏模式的影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3136-3144.
[10] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[11] 周小文,陈凌伟,程展林,汪明元,. 软基路堤施工稳定性控制标准研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2631-2635.
[12] 黄广军. Asaoka法预测软土地基沉降时存在的问题和对策[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1061-1065.
[13] 朱 斌,冯凌云,柴能斌,郭小青, . 软土地基上海堤变形与失稳的离心模型试验与数值分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3317-3323.
[14] 蒋建清 ,曹国辉 ,刘热强,. 排水板和砂井联合堆载预压加固海相软土地基的工作性状的现场试验[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 551-558.
[15] 孙立强 ,张京京 ,李 恒 ,闫澍旺 ,霍知亮 , . 软土地基上影响预应力钢筒混凝土管相对转角关键因素研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 293-298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!