›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 3154-3162.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.11.010

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桩端荷载与地震耦合作用下溶洞顶板的破坏特征及安全厚度计算

黄 明,付俊杰,陈福全,江 松   

  1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-06 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈福全,男,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:phdchen@fzu.edu.cn E-mail:huangming05@163.com
  • 作者简介:黄明,男,1983年生,工学博士,副教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 41672290);福建省自然科学基金(No. 2016J01189)。

Damage characteristics of karst cave roof and its safety thickness calculation under the coupling effect of pile-tip load and seismic wave

HUANG MING, FU Jun-jie, CHEN Fu-quan, JIANG Song   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
  • Received:2016-12-06 Online:2017-11-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672290) and Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2016J01189).

摘要: 桩基支撑于溶洞顶板的情况时有发生,研究地震作用下桩端溶洞顶板的稳定性具有重要意义。根据相似定理和分离相似设计方法,基于振动台模型试验对顶板厚度及溶洞直径变化下桩端顶板的动力响应特征进行了研究。结果表明,桩端溶洞顶板在地震作用下的破坏模式与顶板厚度及溶洞尺寸大小密切相关,一定顶板厚度情况下溶洞尺寸较小时(洞径 , 为桩径)表现为剪切破坏,而洞径较大时(如 )为显著的冲剪破坏,洞径越大,冲切块体积所占比例越大;基于振动台试验得到的岩溶顶板破坏模式,结合拟静力法构建了可考虑岩体特性、地震烈度及桩径大小影响的最小顶板安全厚度理论计算模型。通过算例分析表明,最小安全厚度相比静力条件下要大,且随地震烈度的增强而增大,相同条件下冲-剪破坏的计算值均大于剪切破坏情况,说明地震环境下溶洞尺寸越大,所需顶板厚度越大。其成果可为实际工程中岩溶顶板安全厚度的计算提供理论基础。

关键词: 岩溶桩基, 地震作用, 振动台试验, 顶板破坏模式, 安全厚度

Abstract: Pile foundation is installed on the roof of karst cave under certain conditions. It is great significance to investigate the stability and the safety thickness of karst cave roof, when it is subjected to the coupling effect of the earthquake and pile-tip load. Based on the similarity theory and the separation similarity design method, dynamic failure characteristics of the cavern roof were studied by varying the roof thickness and cave diameter using the shaking table. Results show that the failure modes of the top of the cave roof are closely related to the thickness of the roof and the size of the cave in the earthquake. With a certain thickness of roof, when the cave-diameter was smaller than 2d (where d is the pile diameter), shear failure happened in the roof. On the contrary, when the cave diameter was larger than 4d, punching-shear failure occurred. This indicates that the larger the diameter is, the greater the proportion of punching volume is. According to failure characteristics of the karst roof obtained by shaking table tests, the theoretical calculation model was proposed for minimum roof safety thickness, combining with the quasi-static method. Besides, the proposed model considered characteristics of rock mass, seismic intensity and pile diameter. It was shown by numerical studies that the minimum safety thickness was larger than that under static condition, and it increased with the increase of seismic intensity. Under the same condition, the calculated values of punching and shearing were larger than those of shear failure, which indicates that in the earthquake environment, the greater the cave size is, the higher the thickness of the required roof is. Therefore, this study can provide a valuable reference for developing the design approaches for the karst-pile in the earthquake region.

Key words: karst pile foundation, earthquake action, shaking table test, failure characteristics of cave roof, safety thickness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1+1

[1] 李利平, 朱宇泽, 周宗青, 石少帅, 陈雨雪, 屠文锋. 隧道突涌水灾害防突厚度计算方法及适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 41-50.
[2] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[3] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[4] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[5] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[6] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[7] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[8] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[9] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[10] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[11] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[12] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[13] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[14] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[15] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!