›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 3287-3294.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.11.026

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

层状非均质性对CO2在盖层中迁移泄漏规律的影响

高 帅1, 2,魏 宁1,李小春1,雷宏武1,刘明泽1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国石油大学(华东) 储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 魏宁,男,1978年生,研究员,主要从事CO2地质封存方面的研究工作。E-mail: nwei@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:gsmengqi@ 163.com
  • 作者简介:高帅,男,1988年生,在站博士后,主要从事CO2地质封存中盖层密封性能的试验和数值模拟方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项课题(No. XDA07040300);中科院青年创新促进会支持(No.20140015)。

Effect of layered heterogeneity on CO2 migration and leakage mechanism in the cap rock

GAO Shuai1, 2, WEI Ning1, LI Xiao-chun1, LEI Hong-wu1, LIU Ming-ze1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
  • Received:2016-12-05 Online:2017-11-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Strategic Priority Research Program (XDA07040300) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS (20140013).

摘要: 盖层密封性能对CO2地质封存工程的容量、经济性、安全性具有重要影响。盖层岩石具有明显的层状非均质特点,而这种层状非均质特点直接影响CO2在盖层中的迁移与泄漏过程,从而影响盖层的密封性能。现有研究考虑了各向同性的非均质性对盖层密封性能的影响,但并未针对层状非均质性盖层展开相应的研究。建立了考虑孔隙度、渗透率和毛管压力参数变化关系的均质、非层状非均质和层状非均质3种盖层地质模型,并采用TOUGH2对统一边界条件的不同地质模型开展了数值模拟对比研究,分析了CO2进入盖层、盖层内迁移和穿透盖层而形成缓慢泄漏的全过程。模拟结果表明:3种模型中,自由态CO2饱和度分布与孔隙度、渗透率的分布基本一致;与均值模型相比,非层状非均质性会加速CO2在盖层中的迁移,而层状非均质性将会阻碍CO2在盖层中的迁移,增加穿透时间;与均质模型和非层状非均质模型相比,层状非均质模型将会大大降低CO2的穿透盖层以后的泄漏速率和泄漏总量。针对建模和数值模拟过程中遇到的问题,提出了盖层地质建模过程中的一些局限性。其结果为更加客观和定量地评价CO2在盖层内迁移规律及泄漏量奠定了一定的基础。

关键词: CO2地质封存, 盖层, 层状非均质性, 迁移, 数值模拟

Abstract: The sealing ability of cap rock has a critical influence on the storage capacity, economy, and security in CO2 geological storage project. Due to the obvious characteristic of layered heterogeneity of the cap rock, it directly affects the migration and leakage process of CO2 in the cap rock. As a result, the cap rock sealing ability is also affected. Currently, the effect of isotropic heterogeneity on the sealing ability of cap rock was studied in the literature. However, the effect of layered heterogeneity has not been investigated yet. In this study, the homogeneous, non-layered heterogeneous and layered heterogeneous models were separately established by considering the different spatial distribution of porosity, permeability and capillary pressure of cap rock. Under consistent CO2 injection conditions, numerical simulations were conducted using these three models to comparatively study the whole leaking process of CO2 entering, migrating and breakthrough all over the cap rock by using TOUGH2. Results revealed that the distributions of free CO2 saturation in the cap rock agreed with the spatial distributions of porosity and permeability among the models. In contrast with the homogeneous model, non-layered heterogeneity accelerated the CO2 migration, whereas layered heterogeneity slowed down CO2 migration in the cap rock, and increased the period of CO2 breaking through the cap rock. Compared with the homogeneous and non-layered heterogeneous models, layered heterogeneous model greatly decreased the leakage rate and total leakage amount of CO2 after the breakthrough of CO2. At last, limitations on the geological modelling were addressed. Hence, the research results provide helpful guidance for more objective and quantificational evaluation on CO2 migration and leakage through the cap rock.

Key words: CO2 geological sequestration, cap rock, layered heterogeneity, migration, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[4] 文伟, 赖远明, 尤哲敏, 李积锋, . 基于Pitzer离子模型的盐渍非饱和土孔隙 相对湿度计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1944-1952.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[7] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[8] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[9] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[10] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[11] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[12] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[13] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[14] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[15] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!