›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 3363-3370.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.11.036

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

确定渗析平衡时间的数值模拟方法

李 芃1,谭晓慧1,辛志宇2,王 雪1,谢 妍1   

  1. 1. 合肥工业大学 资源与环境工程学院,安徽 合肥 230009;2. 山西省建筑设计研究院,山西 太原 030009
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:李芃,女,1992年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目面上项目(No. 41572282, No. 41372281, No. 41172273)。

Numerical simulation of determination of equilibrium time for osmotic technique

LI Peng1, TAN Xiao-hui1, XIN Zhi-yu2, WANG Xue1, XIE Yan1   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China; 2. Institute of Shanxi Architectural Design and Research, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030009, China
  • Received:2016-12-05 Online:2017-11-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572282, 41372281, 41172273).

摘要: 渗析法是一种测量非饱和土基质吸力的重要方法,而测量结果是否准确,控制渗析的时间非常重要。基于有限元数值分析软件SEEP/W,建立渗析法的数值模型,分析渗析的试验过程,研究溶液吸力、土样水力参数、初始重力含水率、初始干密度以及土样大小等因素对吸湿条件下非饱和黏土渗析平衡时间的影响。结果表明,随着渗析时间的增加,土样与溶液之间的吸力差逐渐变小,渗析过程变慢;试验用土样不宜过大,对于较小土样,多数条件下土样的渗析平衡时间约为1.5~8.0 d;当溶液吸力较大或土体饱和渗透系数较小时,渗析平衡时间大大增加;渗析平衡时间随土-水特征参数a、n、饱和渗透系数、初始含水率及干密度的增大而减小,随饱和体积含水率的增加而增加。

关键词: 渗析法, 基质吸力, 黏土, 平衡时间, 影响因素

Abstract: Osmotic technique is an important method for measuring the matrix suction of unsaturated soil. It is very important to control the osmotic time, which is one of the key points to obtain the accurate measurement result. Based on the finite element numerical analysis software SEEP/W, we set up a numerical model of osmotic technique to analyze water movement during the osmotic process. Then, we analyzed the influences of the suction of solution, the hydraulic properties of soil sample, the initial gravity moisture content, the initial dry density and the size of soil sample on equilibrium time of the osmotic technique for unsaturated clay in the process of humidification. The results show that with the increase of osmotic time, the difference of suction between the solution and the soil sample will decrease and then the osmotic process will become slower. Soil samples should not be too large. For small samples, the equilibrium time for the osmotic technique is about 1.5-8.0 days in most cases. The equilibrium time increases greatly when the suction of solution is high or the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil sample is low. The equilibrium time decreases with the increase of the fitting parameters (a, n) for soil-water characteristic curve, the saturated hydraulic conductivity, the initial moisture content and the initial dry density. On the contrary, the equilibrium time increases with the increase of saturated volumetric moisture content.

Key words: osmotic technique, matrix suction, clay, equilibrium time, influence factors

中图分类号: 

  • O 241

[1] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[2] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[3] 谈云志, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰钝化红黏土水敏性的机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2207-2214.
[4] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[5] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[6] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[7] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[8] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[9] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[10] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[11] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[12] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[13] 杨军, 魏庆龙, 王亚军, 高玉兵, 侯世林, 乔博文, . 切顶卸压无煤柱自成巷顶板变形 机制及控制对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 989-998.
[14] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 379-388.
[15] 徐杰, 周建, 罗凌晖, 余良贵, . 高岭-蒙脱混合黏土渗透各向异性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!