›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 3475-3483.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.12.011

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含瓦斯砂岩卸围压变形特征与渗透规律试验研究

张东明1, 2,郑彬彬1, 2,张先萌1, 2,齐消寒1, 2,白 鑫1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学 资源及环境科学学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-04 出版日期:2017-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:张东明,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿山与安全方面的研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(No.2016ZX05045-004)。

Experimental study on the deformation characteristics and permeability laws of gas infiltrated sandstone under unloading confining pressure condition

ZHANG Dong-ming1, 2, ZHENG Bin-bin1, 2, ZHANG Xian-meng1, 2, QI Xiao-han1, 2, BAI Xin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. College of Resource and Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2016-01-04 Online:2017-12-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2016ZX05045-004).

摘要: 为研究含瓦斯砂岩卸荷破坏过程中的变形及渗流规律,采用自主研发的含瓦斯煤热-流-固耦合渗流伺服试验系统,开展了不同围压和相同瓦斯压力条件下的卸围压渗流试验,建立了基于应变指标的瓦斯渗流模型。得出的主要结论有:(1)含瓦斯砂岩破坏表现出明显的脆性特征,峰值应力点后瞬间,应力、应变及流量均出现突跳;(2)应力-应变及渗透率变化呈现明显的阶段性特征:孔隙、微裂隙压密及弹性变形阶段(I、II阶段),砂岩渗透性为0;卸荷屈服阶段(III阶段),产生新的损伤,渗透性小幅增加;卸荷破坏应力跌落阶段(IV阶段),应力突降,应变陡增,裂隙贯通后渗透性陡增,是渗透性主导阶段;破坏后阶段(V),应力、应变及流量变化均趋于稳定;(3)含瓦斯砂岩破坏阶段,受气体压力和泊松效应影响,使径向应变和体积应变远大于轴向应变;(4)含层理砂岩卸荷破坏形式以产生沿层理面方向的张剪混合裂缝为主。基于Kozeny-Carman方程和裂隙流理论,建立了应变相关渗透率模型,揭示了含瓦斯砂岩损伤破坏渗流机制,对研究瓦斯突出、及在破断岩体中的运移规律及抽采孔优化设计等具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 采矿工程, 瓦斯, 砂岩, 卸围压, 渗透率模型

Abstract: In this study, a self-developed ‘THM coupled with triaxial servo-controlled seepage apparatus for gas infiltrated coal’ was employed to study the deformation and permeability laws of sandstone. Seepage experiments were carried out at the same gas pressure and under different unloading confining pressures. Then, a seepage model was established on the basis of strain parameters of sandstone. The results showed that gas infiltrated sandstone exhibited clear brittle feature during the failure process and sudden jumps occurred among the stress, strain and flow immediately after the peak stress point. Both changes of stress-strain and permeability showed obvious periodical characteristics, which means that the gas permeability was zero during pore and micro-fissure compaction, and elastic deformation stages (I and II). During unloading and yield stage (III), new fractures were initiated and the permeability increased slightly. During unloading failure stage (IV), the stress dropped significantly, the strain increased sharply, and the gas flow also increased greatly when fractures connected with each other, which indicated that this period was dominated by the permeability. The strain, stress, and gas flow all tended to be steady after failure (V). At failure state of sandstone, the radial strain and volumetric strain were far larger than the axial strain, due to the effects of gas pressure and the Poisson. The unloading failure mode of bedding sandstone was mainly dominated with extension and shear fracture along beddings. Based on Kozeny-Carman equation and fracture flow theory, the permeability model related to strain was established. Finally, the permeation mechanism of gas infiltrated sandstone at different failure states was revealed.

Key words: mining engineering, gas, sandstone, unloading confining-pressure, permeability models

中图分类号: 

  • TU 454

[1] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] 杨括宇, 陈从新, 夏开宗, 宋许根, 张伟, 张褚强, 王田龙. 崩落法开采金属矿巷道围岩破坏机制的断层效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 279-289.
[3] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 赵怡晴, 吴常贵, 金爱兵, 孙浩, . 热处理砂岩微观结构及力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[5] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[6] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[7] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[8] 李斌, 黄 达, 马文著, . 层理面特性对砂岩断裂力学行为的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 858-868.
[9] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[10] 宋文成, 梁正召, . 承压水上开采倾斜底板破坏特征 与突水危险性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 624-634.
[11] 杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透 特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[12] 彭守建, 郭世超, 许江, 郭臣业, 张超林, 贾立, . 采动诱导应力集中对顺层钻孔瓦斯抽采 影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 99-108.
[13] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[14] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
[15] 赵波, 张广清, 唐梅荣, 庄建满, 林灿坤, . 长期注水对致密砂岩油藏岩石力学 性质影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3344-3350.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!