›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 3660-3669.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.12.034

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于集合经验模态分解与支持向量机回归的位移预测方法:以三峡库区滑坡为例

邓冬梅,梁 烨,王亮清,王昌硕,孙自豪,王 聪,董曼曼   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-23 出版日期:2017-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 王亮清,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性与地质灾害防治的教学与科研工作。E-mail: wlq027@126.com E-mail:deng_dmei@163.com
  • 作者简介:邓冬梅,女,1992年生,硕士研究生,主要从事边坡监测、预测研究及稳定性分析方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41372310);中国地质大学(武汉)中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(No.1610491T07)。

Displacement prediction method based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine regression— a case of landslides in Three Gorges Reservoir area

DENG Dong-mei, LIANG Ye, WANG Liang-qing, WANG Chang-shuo, SUN Zi-hao, WANG Cong, DONG Man-man   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2016-11-23 Online:2017-12-11 Published:2018-06-05

摘要: 三峡库区滑坡地表位移-时间曲线多呈台阶型特征。基于位移响应成分模型的滑坡位移预测方法是该类滑坡位移预测的主要方法之一。针对目前水库滑坡波动项位移预测工作中尚未考虑主要诱发因素的高频成分与低频成分的问题,提出了基于时间序列集合经验模态分解(EEMD)与重构的粒子群优化-支持向量机回归(PSO-SVR)位移预测方法。以白水河滑坡2003年7月至2013年3月117个地表位移数据为例,采用EEMD法将位移时间序列分解为趋势项位移和波动项位移,该趋势项位移用最小二乘法的二次多项式拟合预测;根据EEMD和t检验法,确定高频降雨量、低频降雨量、高频库水位和低频库水位,结合其他常用因素,采用灰色关联分析确定白水河滑坡影响波动项位移的优势因素为高频降雨量和月间库水位变化,基于优势因素建立PSO-SVR模型预测波动项位移。结果表明,总预测值的平均相对误差为0.009 8,方差比为0.023 9,小误差概率为1,预测效果较好。利用该方法对三峡库区其他5个台阶型滑坡进行了预测,预测位移与实测位移较吻合,进一步证明了该方法的有效性,对同类滑坡的预测预报具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 三峡库区, 滑坡位移预测, 诱发因素, 集合经验模态分解, PSO-SVR

Abstract: Many landslides in Three Gorges Reservoir area are featured by stepwise increasing surface displacement along the time. Responding composition model is one of the main methods for displacement prediction of landslides. Currently, high-frequency and low-frequency components of inducing factors are usually ignored. A method based on reconstruction of time series by ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and particle swarm optimization based support vector machine regression (PSO-SVR) prediction for displacement is proposed. The typical Baishuihe landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir is taken as an example. Firstly, the monitored surface displacement time series from July 2003 to March 2013 is decomposed into trend and fluctuant components by EEMD. The trend component can be predicted using quadratic polynomial equation fitted by the least square method. With EEMD and t-test methods, rainfalls and reservoir levels time series are reconstructed into high-frequency rainfalls, low-frequency rainfalls, high-frequency reservoir levels and low-frequency reservoir levels, respectively. Combined with other common factors, high-frequency rainfalls and monthly variations of reservoir levels are selected as predominant factors for fluctuant displacement components by method of gray relational analysis (GRA). Finally, PSO-SVR is utilized for prediction purpose. Application results show that average relative error is 0.009 8, variance ratio is 0.023 9 and small error probability is 1, which demonstrate preferable effect of the proposed method. For verification and testing, 5 other typical landslides in Three Gorges Reservoir area are presented to test the effectiveness of our method, which can provide references for similar landslides.

Key words: Three Gorges Reservoir, landslide displacement prediction, inducing factors, ensemble EMD, PSO-SVR

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42

[1] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[2] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[3] 丁王飞,周云涛, . 三峡库区蓄水期间类土质岸坡断裂解体机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 197-204.
[4] 周云涛 . 三峡库区危岩稳定性断裂力学计算方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 495-499.
[5] 王世昌,黄波林,刘广宁,陈小婷. 龚家方4号斜坡涌浪数值模拟分析[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 212-218.
[6] 郑 轩 ,孔令伟,. 连续桩键结构的抗滑机制及加固效果研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2616-2622.
[7] 卢书强 ,易庆林 ,易 武 ,黄海峰 ,张国栋 , . 三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.
[8] 肖诗荣 ,卢树盛 ,管宏飞 ,宋桂林,. 三峡库区凉水井滑坡地质力学模型研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3534-3542.
[9] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413-0418.
[10] 李远耀,殷坤龙,柴 波,张桂荣. 三峡库区滑带土抗剪强度参数的统计规律研究[J]. , 2008, 29(5): 1419-1424.
[11] 李维树,丁秀丽,邬爱清,熊诗湖. 蓄水对三峡库区土石混合体直剪强度参数的弱化程度研究[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1338-1342.
[12] 李维树 ,夏 晔 ,乐俊义 , . 水对三峡库区滑带(体)土直剪强度参数的弱化规律研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 1170-1174.
[13] 李维树,邬爱清,丁秀丽. 三峡库区滑带土抗剪强度参数的影响因素研究[J]. , 2006, 27(1): 56-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!