›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S2): 210-216.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S2.029

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含盐量与布筋方式对纤维加筋土抗压性能的影响

魏 丽1,柴寿喜2,姜宇波3   

  1. 1. 天津城建大学 理学院 天津 300384;2. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室 天津 300384; 3. 天津城建大学 地质与测绘学院,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-01 出版日期:2017-11-23 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:魏丽,女,1979年生,博士研究生,副教授,从事滨海盐渍土的改性固化与加筋研究。
  • 基金资助:

    天津市自然科学基金项目(No. 17JCYBJC22200, No. 17JCZDJC39200);天津市科技支撑计划项目(No. 15ZXCXSF00070)。

Effects of salt content and reinforcement mode on compression properties of fiber reinforced stabilized soil

WEI Li1, CHAI Shou-xi2, JIANG Yu-bo1   

  1. 1. School of Science, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300381, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Engineering Character and Engineering Environment of Tianjin, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300381, China; 3. School of Geology and Geomatics, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2017-09-01 Online:2017-11-23 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin(17JCYBJC22200, 17JCZDJC39200) and the Key Technologies R & D Program of Tianjin(15ZXCXSF00070).

摘要: 纤维与石灰粉煤灰加筋固化土的抗压性能受到含盐量与纤维布筋方式的影响。选择9个含盐量(0.5%、1.5%、2.5%、3.5%、4.5%、5.5%、7%、8.5%和10%)和6种布筋方式(试样整体、上1/3、上1/2、中1/3、下1/2和下1/3),开展固化土与加筋固化土的无侧限抗压试验。试验结果表明,随含盐量的增加,固化土及纤维加筋固化土的抗压强度与破坏应变先减小后增大,临界含盐量为7%左右;纤维位于试样的中1/3处时抗压强度最大,试样整体、下1/2、上1/2、下1/3与上1/3处布筋时抗压强度依次减小;固化土与纤维加筋固化土的应力–应变关系均为应变软化型;试样整体布筋时,土的抗变形性能最优。纤维加筋作用可抵消高含盐量引起的盐胀与吸湿软化对固化土抗压性能的破坏。选择试样整体布筋或中部布筋时,加筋效果更为显著。

关键词: 加筋土, 聚丙烯纤维, 抗压强度, 含盐量, 布筋方式

Abstract: The compressive strength of the fiber-lime-fly ash-saline soil is affected by the salt contents and reinforcement modes. Unconfined compressive tests are conducted on lime-fly ash-saline soil and fiber-lime-fly ash-saline soil in the condition of nine salt contents(0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, 3.5%, 4.5%, 5.5%, 7.0%, 8.5% and 10%) and six reinforcement modes (the whole sample, the top1/3, the top 1/2, the middle 1/3, the bottom 1/2 and the bottom 1/3 of sample). The results show that both the compressive strength and the failure strain increase with increasing salt content which is less than 7%, and decreases with increasing salt content which is more than 7%. When the fibers are added to the middle 1/3 of the sample, the compressive strength is the largest, which is reduced to the whole, the bottom 1/2, the top 1/2, the bottom 1/3 and the top 1/3 of sample. The compressive strength is basically the same when the reinforcement mode is the bottom 1/2 and the top 1/2, and that of the reinforcement modes is the bottom 1/3 and the top 1/3. The All stress-strain curves of lime-fly ash-saline soil and fiber-lime-fly ash-saline soil are strain softening. The soil has the best deformation resistance when the sample is reinforced entirely. Fiber reinforcement can counteract the damage caused by salt expansion and moisture absorption softening of solidified soil due to high salt content. The deformation resistance of fiber-lime-fly ash-saline soil is best when the whole sample is reinforced fibers.

Key words: reinforced soil, polypropylene fiber, compressive strength, salt content, reinforcement modes

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472

[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[4] 高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[5] 沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[6] 赵晓彦, 范宇飞, 刘亮, 蒋楚生, . 铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙潜在破裂面特征模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[7] 王东星, 肖 杰, 肖衡林, 马 强, . 武汉东湖淤泥碳化-固化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1805-1812.
[8] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷 涛, 刘 琪, 王智猛, 刘 勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[9] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 王 珣, 黄昊威, 黄 哲, 王智猛, . 面板对加筋土挡墙影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[10] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[11] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, 高泽飞, 王智猛, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[12] 王 琦, 孙会彬, 江 贝, 高 松, 李术才, 高红科, . 基于数字钻探和支持向量机预测岩体 单轴抗压强度的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1221-1228.
[13] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[14] 查甫生, 刘晶晶, 许龙, 邓永锋, 杨成斌, 储诚富, . 水泥−粉煤灰固化/稳定重金属污染土的电阻率 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4573-4580.
[15] 王东星, 王宏伟, 邹维列, 徐学勇, . 活性MgO−粉煤灰固化淤泥耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4675-4684.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!