›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 93-102.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1527

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含石量对土石混合体剪切特性的影响

唐建一,徐东升,刘华北   

  1. 华中科技大学 土木工程与力学学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-19 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 徐东升,男,1985年生,博士,讲师,硕士研究生导师,主要从事软土、粗粒土及光纤光栅传感方面的教学与研究工作。 E-mail: dsxu@hust.edu.cn E-mail:1273185236@qq.com
  • 作者简介:唐建一,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土石混合体方面的研究。E
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51508215);中央高校基本科研业务费资助(No. 2017KFYXJJ138)。

Effect of gravel content on shear behavior of sand-gravel mixture

TANG Jian-yi, XU Dong-sheng, LIU Hua-bei   

  1. School of Civil Engineering & Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2017-07-19 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508215) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017KFYXJJ138).

摘要: 为了探究不同含石量对土石混合体的抗剪强度及剪胀性的影响,利用先进的大型单剪试验仪进行了21组大型单剪试验。试验设计了从0%~80%含石量共7组试验样品,在100、200、300 kPa三种不同的法向压力下进行单剪试验。基于试验结果,分析了含石量对土石混合体的抗剪强度和剪胀、剪缩特性之间的关系。试验结果表明,在相同的法向压力下,随着含石量的增加,土石混合体的内摩擦角及黏聚力总体上有先增大后减小的趋势。当土石混合体在含石量为40%~50%之间时,其抗剪强度最大。研究表明:土石混合体抗剪强度受到土石混合体孔隙比的影响,同时随着含石量的增加,土石混合体中的结构形式及主导颗粒也相应的发生变化。当含石量在0%~20%之间时,细集料在土石混合体中占主导地位,土石混合体为悬浮密实结构,此时土石混合体的抗剪强度与基质颗粒的性质相近;当含石量在20%~50%时,土石混合体为骨架孔隙结构,随着含石量的增加,土石混合体的骨架逐渐形成,颗粒之间咬合力增加,使得黏聚力及内摩擦角都有明显提高;当含石量超过50%之后,土石混合体表现为骨架密实结构,孔隙率开始上升并且细粒料开始大幅减少,细集料不能充分填充块石之间的孔隙,于是土石混合体抗剪强度开始下降。

关键词: 土石混合体, 单剪试验, 抗剪强度, 剪胀性, 含石量

Abstract: To investigate the impact of gravel content on shear strength and dilatation of sand-gravel mixture, the large-scale simple shear tests of 21 simples were conducted using an advanced shear apparatus. Seven groups of sand-gravel mixture samples with gravel content ranging from 0% to 80% were prepared for shear tests under three different normal pressures (100, 200, 300 kPa). Relationships among the gravel content and shear strength, dilatation, shear contraction of sand-gravel mixture were analyzed based on the test results. It is shown that under the same normal stress, the internal friction angle and cohesion of the sand-gravel mixture initially increase then decrease as the gravel content rises. The shear strength achieves the maximum as the gravel content is located within the range of 40%-50%. Further analysis indicates that the shear strength of the sand-gravel mixture significantly depends on the void ratio of mixture. Meanwhile, the structure of sand-gravel mixture and dominant particles change as the gravel content increases. When the gravel content is below 20%, the sand-gravel mixture is dominated by fine component, and presents a typical suspended dense structure. In this case, the shear strength of sand-gravel mixture is close to that of the matrix. When the gravel content is between 20% and 50%, the sand-gravel mixture shows a skeleton-pore structure. As the gravel content increases, the skeleton is formed gradually, and biting force between particles increase, leading to the raise in the strength of the mixture. When the gravel content is above 50%, the mixture exhibits a typical dense skeleton structure. In this case, void ratio of the mixture increases, and the matrix is unable to fill the void as the gravel content increases, which results in lower shear strength.

Key words: sand-gravel mixture, simple shear test, shear strength, shear dilation, gravel content

中图分类号: 

  • TD 853.34

[1] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[2] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[3] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[4] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[5] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[6] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[7] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[8] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[9] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[10] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[11] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[12] 洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[13] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[14] 付宏渊, 刘 杰, 曾 铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩 变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[15] 张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王 南, 樊 孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体(CGN+C)界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!