›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 151-157.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0107

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗剪强度分项系数的标准差反馈标定法

朱 勇1,冯夏庭1,周 辉1,张传庆1,张铭强2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 浙江省交通规划设计研究院,浙江 杭州 310006
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-12 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:朱勇,男,1979年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程可靠度、稳定性、风险评估方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(No. 2014CB046902);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51279201)。

Calibration of partial factors of shear strength parameters using standard deviation feedback method

ZHU Yong1, FENG Xia-ting1, ZHOU Hui1, ZHANG Chuan-qing1, ZHANG Ming-qiang2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Communications Planning, Design & Research, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China
  • Received:2016-01-12 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB046902) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51279201).

摘要: 基于可靠度理论的分项系数极限状态设计方法是当今岩土工程设计的一个趋势,分项系数的标定是确定设计参数的关键。岩土材料强度分项系数需反映材料参数的变异性,现有理论方法如安全系数校核法、一次二阶矩校核法、验算点校核法等理论标定方法,没有明确说明分项系数如何降低参数不确定性的影响,理论基础有待进一步完善。因此,提出岩土材料强度分项系数的标准差反馈标定法,该方法在目标可靠度的基础上,通过观察均值的调整对标准差调整的抵消作用,确定材料强度分项系数,由此确定的分项系数能充分反映强度参数的离散性。通过算例对该标定方法的实现进行了说明,并与验算点校核法进行了对比分析,指出标准差反馈标定法比验算点校核法更加合理。

关键词: 分项系数, 标准差反馈标定法, 一阶可靠指标法

Abstract: Limit state design method based on reliability theory is a trend of modern geotechnical design. Calibration of the partial factors is a key to determine the design strength parameters. Although there are safety factor calibration methods, first order second moment method and designed points method to calibrate the partial factor theoretically, the mechanism of how the partial factors reflect the variance of the geotechnical materials is still unknown. The standard deviation feedback calibration method is then proposed to solve this problem. The core concept of this method is to adjust the mean value of the strength parameters to offset the influence of the standard deviation adjustment. A case study is given to illustrate the method. A comparison between this method and the design points method is taken out to see their different effects on the design strength parameters. The results show that the standard deviation feedback calibration method is more reasonable and the design points method will lead to a conservative design which would raise the budget ultimately.

Key words: partial factor, standard deviation feedback calibration, first order reliability method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 陈祖煜 ,詹成明 ,姚海林 ,陈立宏 ,李 旭,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定分析安全判据和标准[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2129-2137.
[2] 赵新铭,王晓伟,赵春润,黄小娟. 南京江北地区PHC桩竖向承载力可靠度分析[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 785-789.
[3] 周 伟,常晓林,徐建强. 基于分项系数法的重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J]. , 2007, 28(2): 315-320.
[4] 袁林娟,常晓林 . 整体式折线重力坝的深层抗滑稳定及加固研究[J]. , 2003, 24(4): 626-630.
[5] 邓志勇 ,陆培毅 ,王成华,. 钻孔灌注桩单桩承载力的可靠度研究[J]. , 2003, 24(1): 83-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!