›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 207-215.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0418

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

川西北茂县群千枚岩各向异性力学特性

吴永胜1,谭忠盛1,喻 渝2,姜 波2,余贤斌3   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044;2. 中铁二院工程集团有限公司,四川 成都 610031; 3. 昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院,云南 昆明 650093
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-05 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:吴永胜,1974年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩石力学与物性等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    铁道部自然科学基金项目资助(No. 2010G018-G-1)。

Anisotropically mechanical characteristics of Maoxian group phyllite in northwest of Sichuan province

WU Yong-sheng1, TAN Zhong-sheng1, YU Yu2, JIANG Bo2, YU Xian-bin3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China
  • Received:2016-03-05 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science of the Ministry of China Railway (2010G018-G-1).

摘要: 利用MTS815Teststar岩石力学试验系统,对川西北茂县群千枚岩开展单轴和三轴试验,研究千枚岩各向异性力学特性。研究结果表明:千枚岩在达到峰值强度50%以前就普遍出现很大的变形和局部破坏,表明围岩产生大变形或出现早期扩容并不意味着其丧失承载能力,如及时进行针对性支护或加强围岩保护仍具有较强的强度。损伤扩容是千枚岩变形破坏的典型特征,并对变形产生不同的影响,横向应变对损伤扩容比轴向应变更敏感,能更灵敏地反映岩石材料内部的屈服、弱化。千枚岩各向异性随含水率与围压水平表现出不同的变化规律,强度各向异性随含水率和围压水平提高而降低,弹性模量和泊松比则与加载方向和转化围压有关。不同含水状态下干燥千枚岩的单轴抗压强度各向异性最为显著,大部分千枚岩的强度各向异性率在0.80以下,其中绢云母千枚岩最强,为0.48,其强弱对比依次为绢云母千枚岩、绿泥石千枚岩、石英千枚岩、炭质千枚岩。千枚岩表现出不同的破坏模式,并随围压或含水率的增加而变化;剪切机制单独控制着各向异性力学特性,千枚岩统一沿软弱面剪切破坏。

关键词: 千枚岩, 力学特性 各向异性, 扩容, 破坏模式

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the anisotropic characteristics of phyllite in Maoxian group from the northwest of Sichuan province in China. A series of uniaxial and triaxial compressive tests is conducted on phyllite samples by using the MTS815Teststar rock mechanics testing system. Experimental results show that the large deformation and partial failure generally appear before samples reach half of their peak strengths. However, the occurrences of large deformation or initial dilatancy do not indicate that rock completely loses its bearing capacity. If the targeted support or protection can be applied on surrounding rock in time, rock strength is still strong. Damage dilation is regarded as a typical deformation and failure characteristic of phyllite. Furthermore, it affects lateral deformation more easily than axial deformation. Thus, lateral deformation can reflect rock yield or weakening more sensitively. Results show that the anisotropy of rock strength decreases with increasing water content and confining pressure. Moreover, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio vary with the loading direction and translated-confining pressure. From the obtained results of phyllite at different water contents, the strength of phyllite under dry condition presents the most obvious anisotropic characteristics in uniaxial compressive tests. It is found that the anisotropic ratios of compressive strength are mainly below 0.8. Especially, sericite phyllite exhibits the strongest anisotropy with a ratio of 0.48, and the following anisotropic orders from strong to weak are sericite phyllite, chlorite phyllite, quartz phyllite, and carbonaceous phyllite. Moreover, there are different failure modes of phyllite, which also change with the increase of confining pressure and water content. Shear failure occurred uniformly along the weak planes, which indicates that the anisotropic mechanical characteristics of phyllite are controlled by shear mechanism independently.

Key words: phyllite, mechanical characteristics, anisotropy, dilation, failure mode

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[3] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[4] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[5] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[6] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[7] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[8] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[9] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[10] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[11] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[12] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[13] 许 江, 瞿佳美, 刘义鑫, 彭守建, 王 威, 吴善康, . 循环剪切荷载作用下充填物对结构面 剪切特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[14] 李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张 彬, 张 嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究 采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
[15] 柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉 华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!