›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 356-366.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0336

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践

钟 山1, 2,江 权1,冯夏庭1,刘继光1,李邵军1,邱士利1,吴世勇3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,岩土力学与国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 雅砻江流域水电开发有限公司,四川 成都 610051
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-01 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 江权,男,1978年生,博士,研究员,主要从事结构面力学特性测试、大型硐室群稳定性分析和工程地质灾害治理等方面的研究工作。E-mail: qjiang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:zs6658885@163.com
  • 作者简介:钟山,男,1993年生,硕士,主要从事深部岩体力学特性测试与分析研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0600707);国家自然科学基金(No. 51379202,No. 51309218)。

A case of in-situ stress measurement in Chinese Jinping underground laboratory

ZHONG Shan1, 2, JIANG Quan1, FENG Xia-ting1, LIU Ji-guang1, LI Shao-jun1, QIU Shi-li 1, WU Shi-yong3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Yalong River Hydropower Development Company, Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China
  • Received:2017-03-01 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0600707) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51379202, 51309218).

摘要: 地应力条件是大型地下洞室稳定性分析与工程设计的必要信息之一,对于深部高应力地下工程的安全评价与灾害防治尤为重要。以埋深2 400 m的中国锦屏地下实验室为例,首先重点阐述了高应力下条件下应力解除法测量地应力的原理与方法,并提出了针对在高应力条件下使用36-2型钻孔变形计地应力测量的改进技术:(1)采用新式阶梯状钻头,分级逐步解除,减小岩芯根部应力集中区域的范围和应力大小;(2)使用大直径解除钻头来增加套孔空心圆柱状岩芯的厚度,即增大裂隙贯通整个岩芯的时间;(3)在测点附近钻取勘探孔以获知测点岩体完整性条件,对是否适合开展测试进行评估。在此基础上,通过现场岩体地应力测试获得每个测孔不同深度垂直钻孔轴线平面上的平面应力状态以及三孔交汇处的三维应力状态(3个主应力的大小和方向),分析开挖扰动导致的围岩应力重分布规律与原始应力场分布。依据洞室围岩重分布应力特征与现场实际破坏的空间位置对应关系,结合现场破坏情况和工程区域地质条件,多角度验证了三维应力结果是可靠的,可为进一步的工程稳定性评价以及围岩支护设计提供依据。

关键词: 地应力测量, 套孔应力解除法, 地下实验室, 高应力, 岩芯饼化

Abstract: In-situ stress condition is one of the essential information of stability analysis and engineering design for underground caverns, and it is particularly important for safety assessment of underground engineering in deep and high-stress condition as well as disaster prevention. Taking Jinping underground laboratory in China (CJPL) buried at a depth of 2 400 m as an example, the principle and method of in-situ stress measurement under high stress based on overcoring method have been expounded at first. Furthermore, some technological improvements are given: 1) Adopting new drill and overcoring gradually to reduce the extent and scope of stress concentration at the roots of the cores; 2) Using large diameter drill to increase the thickness of the hollow cylindrical core, namely increasing the time that fracture needs to cause the rock core to break; 3) Drilling exploration hole near the measuring points to get the integrity condition and to evaluate the feasibility of the test. After theoretical explanation, plane stress state, perpendicular to borehole axis with different depths and three-dimensional stress state are given to analyze original stress field and stress redistribution led by excavation. Verified by the relationship between stress distribution and damage of surrounding rock as well as the result of numerical calculation, the result of three-dimensional stress is proven to be reliable and can be used as a basis of further scientific analysis, engineering stability evaluation and design of disaster prevention.

Key words: in-situ stress measurement, overcoring method, underground laboratory, high stress, rock core disking

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[2] 宫凤强, 伍武星, 李天斌, 司雪峰, . 深部硬岩矩形隧洞围岩板裂破坏的试验模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2085-2098.
[3] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[4] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[5] 董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周 钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征 及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[6] 王朋飞,冯国瑞,赵景礼,Yoginder P. Chugh ,王志强,. 长壁工作面巷顶沿空掘巷围岩应力分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3395-3405.
[7] 赵金帅,冯夏庭,王鹏飞,江 权,陈炳瑞,周扬一,裴书锋, . 爆破开挖诱发的地下交叉洞室微震特性及破裂机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2563-2573.
[8] 赵金帅,冯夏庭,江 权,陈炳瑞,肖亚勋,胡 磊,丰光亮,李鹏翔,. 分幅开挖方式下高应力硬岩地下洞室的微震特性及稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1020-1026.
[9] 司雪峰, 宫凤强,罗 勇,李夕兵, . 深部三维圆形洞室岩爆过程的模拟试验[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 621-634.
[10] 张 强,李小春,胡少斌,牛智勇,汪 芳,范 坤,邵光强,. 高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3641-3650.
[11] 许 度,冯夏庭,李邵军,吴世勇,邱士利,周扬一,高要辉,. 基于三维激光扫描的锦屏地下实验室岩体变形破坏特征关键信息提取技术研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 488-495.
[12] 王成虎,邢博瑞,. 原生裂隙水压致裂原地应力测量的理论与实践新进展[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1289-1297.
[13] 孟庆彬,韩立军,张帆舸,张 建,聂军委,文圣勇,. 深部高应力软岩巷道耦合支护效应研究及应用[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1424-1435.
[14] 武精科,阚甲广,谢生荣,谢福星,陈冬冬,. 深井高应力软岩沿空留巷围岩破坏机制及控制[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 793-800.
[15] 李 斌,许梦国,刘艳章. 临界状态围压在岩石强度准则改进中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 390-398.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!