基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0358

›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 498-506.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0358

基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究

崔凯^{1, 2}，王东华¹，谌文武²，任晓峰²，刘建²，杨光²

1. 兰州理工大学甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730050； 2. 兰州大学西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2016-04-14 出版日期:2018-02-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
通讯作者: 王东华，男，1990年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土工程的研究工作。E-mail: 254657589@qq.com E-mail: 65226683@qq.com
作者简介:崔凯，男，1980年生，博士，副教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程、地质工程、文物保护工程的科研与教学工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 41562015）；国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目（No. 2014BAK16B02）；教育部长江学者创新团队支持计划项目（No. 2017IRT17-51）。

Comparative study of anchorage performance of three types of bolts fully grouted by modified glutinous rice mortar

CUI Kai^{1, 2}, WANG Dong-hua¹, CHEN Wen-wu², REN Xiao-feng², LIU Jian², YANG Guang²

1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China

Received:2016-04-14 Online:2018-02-10 Published:2018-06-06
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41562015), the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the 12th Five-Year Plan Period of China(2014BAK16B02) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China(2017IRT17-51).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 锚固浆液的类型及其与杆体、土体的兼容协调性问题是土遗址锚固领域的研究焦点。由糯米浆为胶凝主材和由黏土、粉煤灰为填充料组成的改性糯米灰浆与木锚杆、玻璃纤维增强塑料锚杆、钢筋锚杆组成了3种锚固系统。通过对3种锚固系统的原位锚固、拉拔试验和界面应力-应变监测，分析比较了3种锚固系统的破坏模式、极限荷载、荷载-位移特征，剖析了杆体-浆体界面应力分布传递规律和界面测点应变对荷载时步的响应程度。在初步分析其锚固机制的基础上，最终得出了此类基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚固系统的锚固性能的优劣完全取决于杆体-浆体的受力机制、变形和强度特征所决定的力学兼容性的结论。该研究成果为以糯米浆为主材的改性浆液在土遗址锚固领域中的应用提供了依据和参考。

关键词: 改性糯米灰浆, 土遗址, 锚固性能, 变形协调, 力学兼容

Abstract: The type of anchorage slurry and its compatibility with blot and slurry are the research focus in the field of earthen sites’ anchorage. Glutinous rice soup was used as major cementing material modified by mixing with clay and fly ash. The experimental program examined three anchoring systems, i.e., wood, glass fiber reinforced plastic, and steel rebar, cemented by modified glutinous rice mortar. The test monitored the ultimate load, load-displacement characteristics, stress-strain on the blot-slurry interface, and the response extent of interfacial monitoring point strain on load step. The preliminary analysis of the mechanism of the anchorage concludes that the anchorage performance the system highly depends on the mechanical compatibility of blot-slurry, which is further determined by its force mechanism, deformation and strength characteristics ultimately. The research results provide a basis and reference for the application of modified mortar mainly made of glutinous rice soup in the field of earthen sites’ anchorage.

Key words: modified glutinous rice mortar, earthen sites, anchorage performance, deformation compatibility, mechanical compatibility

中图分类号:

TU 411.2

崔凯，王东华，谌文武，任晓峰，刘建，杨光，. 基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 498-506.

CUI Kai, WANG Dong-hua, CHEN Wen-wu, REN Xiao-feng, LIU Jian, YANG Guang，. Comparative study of anchorage performance of three types of bolts fully grouted by modified glutinous rice mortar[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 498-506.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[2]	和法国, 吕燃, 粟华忠, 周瑾, 张景科, 王南, . SH材料加固夯筑遗址土耐久性试验及机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 297-307.
[3]	崔凯, 黄井镜, 谌文武, 王东华, 韩宁, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址锚固浆液选型和性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2183-2191.
[4]	张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王南, 樊孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体（CGN+C）界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[5]	任克彬, 王博, 李新明, 尹松, . 毛细水干湿循环作用下土遗址的强度特性与孔隙分布特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 962-970.
[6]	谌文武, 张起勇, 刘宏伟, . SH固土剂在遗址土中的渗透注浆扩散规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 429-435.
[7]	崔凯, 冯飞, 谌文武, 汪小海, 程富强, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址裂隙注浆浆液结石体力学兼容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4627-4636.
[8]	周勇，朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
[9]	裴强强，王旭东，郭青林，张博，赵国靖，赵建忠, . 干旱环境下土遗址夯补支顶加固变形机制室内试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2755-2764.
[10]	曹文贵，谭建辉，胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[11]	赵象卓，张宏伟，CAO Chen，张明，张怀东，韩军, . 不同围岩条件下锚杆肋间距与锚固力优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1263-1270.
[12]	姜文雨, 刘一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[13]	陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
[14]	陈毅，张虎元，杨龙, . 遗址土劣化进程中微观结构变化的类比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4117-4124.
[15]	贾亚杰，梁发云，崔振东，叶华，. 基于层间位移协调的承压水降压引起土层变形分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 42-48.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究

Comparative study of anchorage performance of three types of bolts fully grouted by modified glutinous rice mortar

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0