›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 831-838.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1933

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响

王永洪1, 2,张明义1, 3,刘俊伟1, 3,白晓宇1, 3   

  1. 1. 青岛理工大学 土木工程学院,山东 青岛 266033;2. 青岛理工大学琴岛学院 土木工程系,山东 青岛 266106; 3. 青岛理工大学 蓝色经济区工程建设与安全协同创新中心,山东 青岛 266033
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-22 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 张明义,男,1958年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学及地基基础的试验、教学和研究工作。E-mail: zmy58@163.com E-mail:hong7986@163.com
  • 作者简介:王永洪,男,1984年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事土力学及桩基础的试验、教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51778312,No.41502304);山东省重点研发计划资助项目(No.2017GSF16107);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(No.ZR2016EEP06)。

Influence of excess pore water pressure on shear strength of pile-soil interface in clayey soil

WANG Yong-hong1, 2, ZHANG Ming-yi1, 3, LIU Jun-wei1, 3, BAI Xiao-yu1, 3   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao, Shandong 266033, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological University Qindao College, Qingdao, Shandong 266106, China; 3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone, Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao, Shandong 266033, China
  • Received:2017-09-22 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778312, 41502304), Shandong Key Research and Development Program (2017GSF16107) and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2016EEP06).

摘要: 研究黏性土中桩土界面的抗剪强度及其参数受超孔隙水压力影响的规律,对工程实践具有重要意义。利用自制的大型恒刚度直剪仪,完成了一系列不同界面粗糙度、不同试样含水率和不同剪切速率试验条件下的直剪试验,分析了在不同试验条件下超孔隙水压力变化规律,进而得到考虑超孔隙水压力的桩土界面抗剪强度及其参数的变化规律。研究结果表明:随着界面粗糙度等级提高,桩土界面超孔隙水压力减小,桩土界面抗剪强度、有效黏聚力和有效摩擦系数增加;随着含水率的增加,桩土界面超孔隙水压力增加,桩土界面抗剪强度降低,含水率对桩土界面抗剪强度的影响主要是改变了桩土界面的黏聚力,黏聚力先增大后减小,对摩擦系数的影响较小;特定试验条件下,随着剪切速率的增加,桩土界面超孔隙水压力增加,桩土界面抗剪强度降低,桩土界面黏聚力先增大后又减小,变化幅度不超过2 kPa,对摩擦系数的影响较小。因此,桩土界面抗剪强度及其参数是界面粗糙度、试样含水率和剪切速率变化引起超孔隙水压力变化共同影响的结果,试验结果可供相关工程设计参考。

关键词: 静压桩, 超孔隙水压力, 直剪试验, 界面阻力, 硅压阻式传感器

Abstract: It’s important to study the variation of shear strength and parameters of pile-soil interface for clayey soil with the excess pore water pressure in engineering practice. A series of direct shear test with different interface roughness, water contents and shearing rates is performed using the large-scale direct shear apparatus with constant normal stiffness. The effect on excess pore water pressure is examined under different test conditions. Influence of excess pore water pressure on shear strength of pile-soil interface in clayey soil is obtained. The results show that the excess pore water pressure decreases, and the shear strengths of pile-soil interface, effective cohesion and effective coefficients of friction increase with the increasing interface roughness. The excess pore water pressure increases and the shear strength of pile-soil interface decreases with the increasing water content. The main influence of increasing water content on shear strength of pile-soil interface is changing the cohesion. The cohesion first increases and then decreases. The influence on the coefficients of friction of pile-soil interface is little. The excess pore water pressure increases and the shear strengths of pile-soil interface also decrease with the increasing shear rate. The cohesion of pile-soil interface first increases and then decreases, but the variation is less than 2 kPa, and the little influence on the coefficients of friction of pile-soil interface. The change of shear strength and parameters is influenced by variation of excess pore water pressure, depending on interface roughness, water contents and shear rates. This experimental research is useful for relative engineering design.

Key words: jacked pile, excess pore water pressure, direct shear tests, interface resistance, silicon piezoresistive sensor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[2] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[3] 柴 维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[4] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[5] 李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[6] 陈国庆, 唐 鹏, 李光明, 张广泽, 王 栋, . 岩桥直剪试验声发射频谱特征及主破裂前兆分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.
[7] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[8] 秦昌安, 陈国庆, 郑海君, 唐 鹏. 端部岩桥直剪破坏试验及断裂条件[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 642-653.
[9] 崔国建,张传庆,刘立鹏,周 辉,程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[10] 魏匡民,陈生水,李国英,吴俊杰, . 陡峻河谷高面板坝坝体与坝基接触效应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
[11] 高 樯,温 智,王大雁,牛富俊,谢艳丽,苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
[12] 陈 琛,冷伍明,杨 奇,金子豪,聂如松,邱 鋆,. 混凝土桩-泥皮-砂土接触面力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[13] 赵 坤,陈卫忠,赵武胜,杨典森,宋万鹏,李 灿,马少森, . 地下工程衬砌与减震层接触面力学特性直剪试验及数值仿真[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2662-2670.
[14] 谢 涛,罗 强,张 良,连继峰,于曰明, . 主动与被动状态下墙体侧向位移近似计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1682-1690.
[15] 周 辉,程广坦,朱 勇,卢景景,陈 珺,崔国建,李振国,. 基于三维扫描和三维雕刻技术的岩石结构面原状重构方法及其力学特性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 417-425.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!