›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 949-956.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0589

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

破碎围岩重载铁路隧道基底结构动力特性现场试验研究

李自强1, 2,徐湉 源2,吴秋军2,于 丽2,王明年2,王子健1   

  1. 1.重庆科技学院 建筑工程学院,重庆 401331;2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-28 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 徐湉源,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道工程方向的研究工作。E-mail: 396212053@qq.com E-mail:lzq1102dd@163.com
  • 作者简介:李自强,男,1987年生,博士,主要从事桥梁和地下工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划课题合同(No.2014G005-A);西南交通大学博士研究生创新基金。

Field experimental study of basement structural dynamic properties of the heavy-haul railway tunnel in broken surrounding rock

LI Zi-qiang1, 2, XU Tian-yuan2, WU Qiu-jun2, YU Li2, WANG Ming-nian2, WANG Zi-jian1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science & Technology, Chongqing 401331, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2016-03-28 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Program of Science and Technology Department of China Railway Corporation (2014G005-A) and the Doctoral Innovation fund of Southwest Jiaotong University.

摘要: 通过张家口至唐山付营子隧道现场大型激振试验,模拟研究了V级围岩条件下轴重为250、270、300 kN重载列车作用时隧道基底结构压力响应,并提出了各测点动压力在轴重下降时的衰减规律。根据现场实测的压力-时程图,分析了各结构面动压力的横向和竖向传递规律。结果表明:双线隧道重载线路因直接受重载列车荷载作用而使半幅测点动压力均大于客车线路,重载线路轨道下方相应测点在不同轴重作用下的动压力均大于其他测点,对比IV级围岩表面的试验结果得出破碎围岩条件下重载位置的结构和围岩容易出现压力集中,从而引发结构开裂或围岩空洞。列车荷载在基底结构竖向传递过程中先受到道床结构和仰拱填充的缓冲作用,衰减较大,在仰拱结构中衰减较少,以目前的基底结构设计厚度难以满足轴重提升的需求。

关键词: 重载铁路, 基底结构, 现场试验, 动力响应

Abstract: In this study, dynamic pressure response of base structure of Fu Yingzi tunnel along Zhangjiakou to Tangshan was simulated through field large-scale excitation test under the class V rock conditions when the heavy haul trains with axle weights of 250 kN, 270 kN, and 300 kN passed. Dynamic pressure attenuation values at measuring points were presented when axle weight was reduced. According to the earth pressure time history chart of field measurement, horizontal and vertical distributions of dynamic pressure of the measuring points in each structural plane were analyzed. The results indicate that dynamic pressure of each measuring point in heavy haul line of double line tunnel is greater than passenger train line, and the dynamic pressure of the corresponding measuring points below the railway track under different axle load of heavy haul trains is greater than other measuring points. Stress concentration is found to appear in the structure and surrounding rock at corresponding heave haul position, which is more likely to cause the structure to crack or hole generation in wall rock under the condition of broken rock compared with the test results on the surface of class IV grade surrounding rock. Train load attenuates drastically due to cushioning of the bed structure and inverted arch filling as it vertically transfers, but there is only small attenuation in inverted arch. Current designed basement structure thickness cannot meet the demand of lifting axle load.

Key words: heavy-haul railway, base structure, field test, dynamic pressure response

中图分类号: 

  • U 451+.5

[1] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[4] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[5] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[6] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[7] 王立安, 赵建昌, 侯小强, 刘生纬, 王作伟. 非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[8] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[9] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[10] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[11] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[12] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[13] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[14] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[15] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!