›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 993-1001.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0529

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地面出入式盾构法隧道施工引起的土体垂直变形

魏 纲1,姜 鑫1,张鑫海2,金 睿3   

  1. 1. 浙江大学城市学院 土木工程系,浙江 杭州 310015;2. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310058; 3. 浙江省建工集团有限责任公司,浙江 杭州 310012
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-21 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:魏纲,男,1977年生,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地下隧道施工对周边环境影响及风险评估与控制方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    浙江省科技厅公益技术应用研究项目(No.2016C33051);住房和城乡建设部2015年科学技术项目计划(No.2015-K5-026)。

Soil vertical deformation induced by ground penetrating shield tunnel construction

WEI Gang1, JIANG Xin1, ZHANG Xin-hai2, JIN Rui3   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 3. Zhejiang Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
  • Received:2016-03-21 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Public Technology Project of Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2016C33051) and the Science and Technology Project of Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People’s Republic of China (2015-K5-026).

摘要: 对地面出入式盾构法隧道施工引起的土体垂直变形计算方法进行研究。考虑盾构轴线与水平面的夹角 (即隧道埋深变化),对林存刚公式进行修正,结合正面附加推力、盾壳摩擦力、附加注浆压力和土体损失的共同作用,提出全新的土体垂直变形计算公式。算例分析结果表明:在隧道埋深较浅工况下,新方法计算结果与林存刚公式的计算结果差异较大,新方法计算得到的开挖面前方地面隆起和后方地面沉降均较大;盾构上仰掘进时,随着 增大,由正面附加推力、盾壳摩擦力及土体损失引起的纵向土体垂直变形曲线呈上移趋势,由附加注浆压力引起的纵向土体垂直变形曲线则呈下移趋势;地面沉降最大值变小,但地面横向沉降槽范围逐渐变大。

关键词: 地面出入式盾构法, 土体垂直变形, Mindlin解, 土体损失

Abstract: This paper is to investigate the calculation methods for the soil vertical deformation induced by constructing the ground penetrating shield tunnel. Lin’s formula was also corrected by considering the included angle ? between the axis of the tunnel and the horizontal plane (namely the variation of the buried depth of tunnel). A new formula of soil vertical deformation was derived by combining with bulkhead additive thrust, the friction force between shield and soil, additional grouting force and soil loss. Through analysing the examples, it was found that the results obtained from the new method were entirely different from those of Lin’s formula in a shallowly embedded tunnel. Especially, the results of the ground uplift before the excavation face and the settlement after the excavation face were both larger by the new method. When the shield tunnel excavated upward with the increase of ?, an upwards trend could be seen from the vertical deformation curve of longitudinal soil, which was induced by bulkhead additive thrust, friction force and soil loss. While in the same situation, a downward trend was found from the deformation curve of soil, which was induced by additional grouting pressure. In addition, the maximum value of the surface settlement reduced, whereas the range of the transverse surface settlement trough increased.

Key words: ground penetrating shield technology, soil vertical deformation, Mindlin solution, soil loss

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432

[1] 周锦强,王树英,阳军生,傅金阳,. 基于Mindlin解分析隧道开挖对近邻桩基的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1075-1081.
[2] 周平槐1, 2,杨学林1. 考虑开挖卸荷影响的桩侧摩阻力等效计算方法[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2953-2960.
[3] 张琼方 ,林存刚 ,丁 智 ,夏唐代 ,单华峰 , . 盾构近距离下穿引起已建地铁隧道纵向变形理论研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 568-572.
[4] 魏 纲,庞思远. 双线平行盾构隧道施工引起的三维土体变形研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2562-2568.
[5] 陈春来,赵城丽,魏 纲,丁 智. 基于Peck公式的双线盾构引起的土体沉降预测[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2212-2218.
[6] 杨建民 ,李 嘉,. 基坑底分层回弹量的实用计算方法[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1413-1420.
[7] 魏新江 ,洪 杰 ,魏 纲 . 双圆盾构施工引起邻近桩基附加荷载的分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 783-790.
[8] 魏 纲 ,洪 杰 ,魏新江 . 双圆盾构隧道施工对平行既有隧道的影响分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 98-104.
[9] 林存刚 吴世明 张忠苗 刘俊伟 李宗梁 . 盾构掘进速度及非正常停机对地面沉降的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2472-2482.
[10] 魏 纲 ,洪 杰 ,魏新江 . 双圆盾构施工引起邻近地下管线附加荷载的分析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1735-1741.
[11] 魏焕卫,宋丰波,杨 敏,孙剑平. 基于明德林解的土钉内力计算方法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 6-14.
[12] 齐静静,徐日庆,魏 纲. 双线平行盾构法隧道施工附加荷载的计算分析[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1665-1670.
[13] 艾智勇,成志勇. 层状地基中轴向受荷单桩的边界元法分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1522-1526.
[14] 陈福全 ,黄伟达 . 基于Poulos弹性理论的被动桩改进算法[J]. , 2008, 29(4): 905-910.
[15] 齐静静 ,徐日庆 ,魏 纲 ,王 涛 . 隧道盾构法施工引起周围土体附加应力分析[J]. , 2008, 29(2): 529-534.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!