›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1317-1326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1122

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

层状含水页岩的抗拉强度特性试验研究

腾俊洋1, 2,唐建新1, 2,张 闯1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学 资源及环境科学学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-17 出版日期:2018-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 唐建新,男,1959年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿山压力及地下工程围岩稳定性方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jtxtang@cqu.edu.cn E-mail: jteng89@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:腾俊洋,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道及地下工程围岩稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室自主课题重点项目(No. 2011DA105287-ZD201504)。

Experimental study on tensile strength of layered water-bearing shale

TENG Jun-yang1, 2, TANG Jian-xin1, 2, ZHANG Chuang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2017-04-17 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control (2011DA105287-ZD201504).

摘要: 为分析层理和水对页岩的抗拉强度特性的影响,现场选取龙马溪组黑色页岩制备成4种含水状态含层理页岩,沿与层理呈0°、30°、60°和90°夹角加载进行巴西劈裂圆盘试验,试验过程同步进行声发射测试,并采用离散元软件3DEC对试验结果进行数值模拟验证。结果表明,相比于含层理页岩,同时考虑含水和层理的页岩在巴西劈裂试验中有其独特的破坏模式和力学特性。含层理页岩的巴西劈裂破坏模式和抗拉强度均与层理角度和含水率有关,破坏模式主要受控于层理与荷载的加载方向,水虽不会影响其破坏模式但能够导致次生裂纹的形成。抗拉强度则表现出随层理角度的增加而先减小后增大,随含水率的增加而减小的趋势。并且,在页岩同时受水和层理损伤作用时,受层理损伤程度越大,水对其损伤程度也越高。通过对含层理不同含水率页岩的微观结构分析得到了上述变化规律的内在机制,即页岩层理面处的内部矿物颗粒遇水膨胀,产生膨胀力作用,使页岩内部结构变得松散、破碎,微裂纹逐渐增多、变宽,宏观表现为次生裂纹的增多,矿物颗粒间的黏结力也在水的作用下降低从而使页岩的抗拉强度下降。

关键词: 页岩, 巴西劈裂, 含水率, 层理, 3DEC

Abstract: To analyze the effects of bedding and water on the tensile strength of shale, specimens with four water contents were prepared with Longmaxi Formation black shale. Brazilian disc splitting tests were carried out on prepared specimens along the angles of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°. Acoustic emission tests were simultaneously performed during the experiments, and results were further simulated by the discrete element software 3DEC. The results show that, compared with the bedding shale, the shale with both water and bedding presents a unique failure mode and special mechanical properties. Both the fracture pattern and tensile strength of Brazil shale ae related to the bedding angle and water content. Particularly, the failure mode is mainly controlled by the loading direction of bedding. Although water do not affect the failure mode, it lead to the formation of secondary cracks. The tensile strength firstly decreases and then increases with increasing the bedding angle, while it decreases with increasing water content. Moreover, under the combined effects of water and bedding, the more the shale is damaged by the bedding, the higher it is damaged by the water. The mechanism of the above changes is obtained based on the analysis of the microstructure of the shale at different water contents. When the internal mineral particles are swollen with water at the surface of the shale, the expansion force is generated, and internal structure of the shale became loose and broken. Furthermore, microcracks gradually increased and broadened. The macroscopic performance accounted for the increase of secondary cracks. In addition, the bond strength between mineral particles is also reduced under the action of water, which further decreases the tensile strength of shale.

Key words: shale, Brazilian test, moisture content, bedding, 3DEC

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[2] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[3] 杨凯旋, 侯天顺. 击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的 影响规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1971-1982.
[4] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[5] 李斌, 黄 达, 马文著, . 层理面特性对砂岩断裂力学行为的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 858-868.
[6] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[7] 修乃岭, 严玉忠, 胥云, 王欣, 管保山, 王臻, 梁天成, 付海峰, 田国荣, 蒙传幼, . 基于非达西流动的自支撑剪切裂缝导流 能力实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 135-142.
[8] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[9] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[10] 闫亚景, 闫永帅, 赵贵章, 张泰丽, 孙强, . 基于高密度电法的天然边坡水分运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2807-2814.
[11] 张钰彬, 黄丹. 页岩水力压裂过程的态型近场动力学模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2873-2881.
[12] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同胶结度断层泥强度参数与含水率关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1657-1662.
[13] 纪国法, 李奎东, 张公社, 李少明, 张 蕾, 刘 炜, . 页岩I型断裂韧性的分形计算方法与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1925-1931.
[14] 吴顺川, 马 骏, 程 业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[15] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!