›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1401-1410.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1088

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

平推式滑坡中底滑面承压水渗流形式对其稳定性的影响

李 伟1, 2,许 强1, 2,吴礼舟1, 2,李斯琦1, 2   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 环境与土木工程学院,四川 成都 610059;2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-13 出版日期:2018-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:李伟,男,1994年生,学士,主要从事地质工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 41630640);国家创新研究群体科学基金(No. 41521002)。

Influence of seepage forms of confined water on translational landslide

LI Wei1, 2, XU Qiang1, 2, WU Li-zhou1, 2, LI Si-qi1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geological Hazard Prevention and Geological Environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2016-05-13 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41630640) and the National Science Fund for Creative Research Groups (41521002).

摘要: 研究平推式滑坡中承压水渗流形式对滑坡稳定性的影响,有利于准确评价斜坡稳定性,对此类滑坡的成灾机制研究具有重要的理论指导意义。基于承压水渗流宽度变化规律,将平推式滑坡中底滑面承压水渗流形式分为辐射流和非辐射流。依据不同的渗流形式,构建了相应的平推式滑坡分析模型,结合地下水向河渠稳定运动相关理论,推导了不同模型中承压水的水头线方程和滑面上扬压力的计算公式,提出了扬压力的3种分布形式,并对平推式滑坡启动判据进行修正,最后结合滑坡实例分析了不同渗流形式对滑坡稳定性的影响规律。

关键词: 平推式滑坡, 承压水, 渗流形式, 扬压力, 斜坡稳定性

Abstract: It is important to study seepage forms of confined water on translational landslide, which is helpful to accurately evaluate the slope stability and provides a reasonable theoretical guidance for studies on the disaster mechanism on translational landslide. Based on the variation law of seepage width of confined water, the seepage forms of confined water on slide plane of translational landslide are divided into the radiation flow and the non-radiative flow. According to different seepage forms, the translational landslide analysis models are established. Based on the theory of groundwater flow to canals, the water head line equation of confined water and the calculation formula of uplift pressure in different models are deduced. Furthermore, three kinds of uplift pressure distribution forms are put forward, and then the starting criterion of translational landslide is modified. Finally, based on a case of translational landslide, the law of slope stability under different forms of seepage is discussed.

Key words: translational landslide, confined water, seepage forms, uplift pressure, slope stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42

[1] 马 凯,尹立明,陈军涛,陈 明,王自起,崔博强,. 深部开采底板隔水关键层受局部高承压水作用破坏理论分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3213-3222.
[2] 陈兴长,陈 慧,游 勇,柳金峰,. 泥石流拦砂坝底扬压力分布及影响因素试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3229-3236.
[3] 胡 勇,李云安,李 波,李从安,肖捷夫,. 承压水位变动下深大基坑空间效应离心试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1999-2007.
[4] 唐 然,许 强,吴 斌,范宣梅,. 平推式滑坡运动距离计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1009-1019.
[5] 朱光丽,张文泉,张贵彬,王树立,. 采动诱发断层活化导水试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3163-3172.
[6] 贾亚杰,梁发云,崔振东,叶 华,. 基于层间位移协调的承压水降压引起土层变形分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 42-48.
[7] 涂国祥,黄润秋. 降雨对路堤斜坡稳定性影响的时间效应[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 523-530.
[8] 郑洪春 ,邓建辉 ,胡万雨 ,崔玉龙 ,周元辅,. 水库岸坡的承压水模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 869-876.
[9] 徐长节 ,徐礼阁 ,孙凤明 ,於 锦 ,杨 迪,. 深基坑承压水的风险控制及处理实例[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 353-358.
[10] 王卫东 ,翁其平 ,陈永才 , . 56 m深TRD工法搅拌墙在深厚承压含水层中的成墙试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3247-3252.
[11] 高广运 ,柴俊磊 ,张先林 ,金清山 . 基于三维数值分析的基坑突涌临界水头确定方法[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 251-256.
[12] 霍军帅,陈 焘,宫全美,周顺华. 复杂周边条件下异形基坑承压水抽水试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 268-273.
[13] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488-0494.
[14] 左宇军,李术才,秦泗凤,李利平. 动力扰动诱发承压水底板关键层失稳的突变理论研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2361-2366.
[15] 范 雷,唐辉明,胡 斌,倪 俊. 二元函数逼近在斜坡可靠度分析中的应用研究[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 624-628.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!