›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1796-1804.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1202

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

改性料礓石力学性质试验

陈卫昌1,王思敬1,李 黎2,张晓平3,王彦兵1, 4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所 页岩气与地质工程重点实验室,北京 100029;2. 中国文化遗产研究院 文物修复所,北京 100871; 3. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430071;4. 国家电网北京经济技术研究院,北京 102209
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-25 出版日期:2018-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-12
  • 作者简介:陈卫昌,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土文物保护及工程地质力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技部支撑计划课题(No. 2013BAK08B11,No. 2014BAK16B02)

Test on mechanical characteristics of modified ginger nut

CHEN Wei-chang1, WANG Si-jing1, LI Li2, ZHANG Xiao-ping3, WANG Yan-bing1, 4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geological Engineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China; 2. Institute of Heritage Restoration, Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage, 100871, China; 3. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China; 4. Beijing Economic and Technical Research Institute, State Grid, Beijing, 102209 China
  • Received:2016-05-25 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Ministry of Science and Technology Support Planning Projects (2013BAK08B11, 2014BAK16B02).

摘要: 改性料礓石作为一种传统硅酸盐建筑材料,可以与修复加固的文物本体很好兼容且牢固结合,现阶段已经运用到文物保护工作中。为研究其全面的力学特性,在前人研究基础上,采用伺服刚性试验机对改性料礓石进行了不同围压下的常规三轴试验、单轴压缩试验及巴西劈裂试验。试验结果表明:材料具有较高的抗压强度和抗拉强度,同时具有韧性特征。在低围压时,试样表现为剪切破坏,当围压超过6 MPa时,试样表现出明显的塑性流动特征,且试样的峰值强度与围压近似线性关系。通过绘制莫尔圆包络线计算出抗剪强度参数c、? 值,并分析了峰值应变、弹性模量和围压的关系。分析改性料礓石结石体的微观结构及固化过程中的化学成分变化,认为水化和碳化产物包裹石英砂颗粒的特殊结构,是材料具备韧性特征的原因。研究结果对改性料礓石的应用及文物修复的现场工作具有重要的意义与价值。

关键词: 改性料礓石, 力学性能, 应力-应变曲线

Abstract: As the earliest concrete in the world, the modified ginger nut has been proved to be proper restoration material for restoring Chinese ancient buildings and cultural relics. In order to study mechanical properties of modified ginger nut, we carry out conventional triaxial compression tests on modified ginger nut. During triaxial test, the failure surfaces are shear failure under low confining pressure (2 MPa). When the confining pressure increases to 6 MPa, there are no obvious failure surfaces but only volume expansion. Mohr circle envelopes are drawn to calculate shear strength parameters. The triaxial test results indicate that the peak strength, peak strain and elastic modulus linearly increased with the increase of confining pressure. The test results indicate that the modified ginger nut has strong deformation capacity as well as mechanical strength. Based on XRD diffraction results and SEM images, we find that quartz particles are covered by hydration and carbonation product and this special structure may be the likely reason to explain why the mechanical strength and deformation capacity are high. The presented results are also expected to provide useful references to the restoration of cultural relics engineering.

Key words: modified ginger nut, mechanical characteristics, stress-strain curve

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
[2] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[3] 俞 缙, 张 欣, 蔡燕燕, 刘士雨, 涂兵雄, 傅国锋, . 水化学与冻融循环共同作用下砂岩细观损伤 与力学性能劣化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 455-464.
[4] 宋洪强, 左建平, 陈 岩, 黎立云, 洪紫杰, . 基于岩石破坏全过程能量特征改进的能量跌落系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 91-98.
[5] 刘 钟, 张楚福, 张 义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[6] 周 芬,梁 强,杜运兴. 单根无黏结预应力筋对加筋体力学性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2442-2450.
[7] 许宏发,柏 准,齐亮亮,耿汉生,马林建,刘 斌, . 基于全应力-应变曲线的软岩蠕变寿命估计[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1973-1980.
[8] 毛 新,汪时机, 程明书,陈正汉,王晓琪,. 膨胀土初始破损与湿干交替耦合作用下的力学行为[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 571-579.
[9] 田 威,裴志茹,韩 女. 基于CT扫描与3D打印技术的岩体三维重构及力学特性初探[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2297-2305.
[10] 贾 珺,肖本林,柯长仁. 基于虚内键模型的三维均质岩石本构关系模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 740-746.
[11] 李光雷,蔚立元,靖洪文,苏海健,张 涛,李 明,. 酸腐蚀后灰岩动态压缩力学性质的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3247-3254.
[12] 陈 俊,符文熹,戴 峰,邓建辉. 用于填筑路堤加固的竹筋格栅力学性能[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 174-179.
[13] 许 雷,刘斯宏,鲁 洋,宋迎俊,杨 齐. 冻融循环下膨胀土物理力学特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 167-174.
[14] 徐 平,张天航,孟芳芳,. 工字钢水泥土搅拌墙基坑支护的力学性能研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 769-774.
[15] 廖晓兰 ,杨久俊 ,张 磊 ,张宝莲 ,梁 超,. 丙烯酰胺聚合固化盐渍土试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2216-2222.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!