›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2311-2317.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2425

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性

杨和平1,唐咸远1, 2,王兴正1,肖 杰1,倪 啸1   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 道路结构与材料交通行业重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410004;2. 广西科技大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 柳州 545006
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-06 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
  • 作者简介:杨和平,男,1954年生,教授,博士生导师,主要从事路基路面工程、特殊土路基研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 50978035,No. 51608053);道路结构与材料交通行业重点实验室开放基金项目(No. kfj100208);湖南省自然科学基金(No. 2017JJ3335);道路灾变防治及交通安全教育部工程研究中心开放基金重点项目(No. kfj20160401)。

Shear strength of expansive soils under wet-dry cycles with loading

YANG He-ping1, TANG Xian-yuan1, 2, WANG Xing-zheng1, XIAO Jie1, NI Xiao1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Road Structure & Materials of Ministry of Communications, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering of Guangxi University of Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China
  • Received:2017-12-06 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50978035, 51608053), the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Road Structure & Materials of Ministry of Communications (Changsha) (kfj100208), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2017JJ3335), the Open Fund of Engineering Research Center of Catastrophic Prophylaxis and Treatment of Road & Traffic Safety of Ministry of Education (Changsha University of Science & Technology) (kfj20160401).

摘要: 针对膨胀土分布区公路边坡常浅层坍滑现状,选取南、北方3种典型膨胀土样,模拟干湿循环并计及边坡破坏时滑面的上覆压力,改变常规试样吸湿及施剪条件开展试验研究,以获得较符合实际的膨胀土抗剪强度及其衰减规律。结果表明:不同上覆压力对膨胀土抗剪强度的影响为荷载越大其强度绝对衰减率越小;用双直线能较好表征其抗剪强度线特征,强度指标c、? 宜按高、低应力段分别获取;随干湿循环次数增加,c值呈指数函数衰减,是造成边坡浅层坍滑的主要原因;? 值随作用次数增加虽有减小趋势,但降幅不大;通过控制基本相同的试验条件,实测得3种膨胀土的最终抗剪强度均降至某一幅值范围。研究结论为解读膨胀土坡为何多浅层坍滑提供了有价值的信息。

关键词: 膨胀土边坡, 有荷干湿循环, 低应力, 抗剪强度, 试验研究

Abstract: The shallow landslide of highway slopes in areas with expansive soil often occurs. Three representative types of expansive soil from the south and north of China are tested under wet-dry cycle in the laboratory. The collapse of slope surface in low pressure conditions, and the conventional process of saturation and shear test are considered in the experimental study. The purpose is to obtain the actual shear strength of expansive soil and its reduction. The results show that the shear strength of the expansive soil affected by different vertical load is not identical. The larger vertical load results in the smaller reduction ratio of shear strength. The sectional double line method is adopted to approximately reflect the nonlinear characteristics of strength of expansive soil. It can also be used to calculate the index of shear strength c and ?. The c reduces exponentially as the number of wet-dry cycles increases, and it is considered as the main reason for the shallow landslide. ? decreases as the number of wet-dry cycles increases. The amplitude of reduction decreases. Under the same wet-dry conditions, the ultimate shear strengths of different expansive soils drop to a certain range. Research conclusion can provide reference for analysis of shallow landslide of expansive soil slope effectively.

Key words: expansive soil slope, wet-dry cycle with loading, lower stress, shear strength, experimental research

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.7

[1] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[2] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[4] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[5] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[6] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 刘奇, 荣驰, . 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[7] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[8] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[9] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[10] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[11] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[12] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[13] 李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
[14] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[15] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!