›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2379-2386.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2028

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析

许 明1、2,唐亚锋2,刘先珊1, 2,罗 斌3,唐道勇2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045;2. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 3. 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司,重庆 400067
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-11 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
  • 作者简介:许明,男,1975年生,副教授,博士,主要从事岩土工程科研与教学工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51478065,No. 51779021);国家山区公路工程技术研究中心开放基金(No. GSGZJ-2015-09)。

Seismic dynamic response of rock slope anchored with adaptive anchor cables

XU Ming1, 2, TANG Ya-feng2, LIU Xian-shan1, 2, LUO Bin3, TANG Dao-yong2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. China Merchants Chongqing Communications Technology Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China
  • Received:2017-10-11 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478065, 51779021) and the National Engineering and Research Center for Mountainous Highways (GSGZJ-2015-09).

摘要: 强震作用下常规锚索往往会因材料变形能力不足导致应力过载而被拉断,一旦锚索失效将直接危及整个锚固结构的安全。为研究自适应锚索的动力响应规律以及在自适应锚索支护下锚固边坡的动力特性,以新型抗震锚索为原型,设计自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡试验模型,并利用振动台试验系统对试验模型进行加载。试验中采用正弦波、天津波、EI波以及Taft波等4种地震波进行研究,监测锚索的应变和边坡动力响应。结果表明:锚索的轴力和地震波幅值、类型、地震激励频率等因素密切相关;锚固边坡坡面加速度及位移沿边坡高程均有不同程度的放大,相对于无锚索支护边坡,锚固边坡坡面加速度和位移峰值均有减小;自适应锚索随着预设滑移恒阻力的不同,锚索会产生不滑移、瞬间滑移、逐步滑移3种工况,对应的锚索应变时程曲线和锚固边坡动力安全系数时程具有显著不同的特征;自适应锚索滑移工况下,滑体的安全系数虽然有局部减小的阶段,但是锚固结构的安全储备较大,可适应边坡大变形和瞬态冲击荷载的作用。试验结果可为强震区路堑边坡的支护和自适应锚索抗震设计提供一定参考。

关键词: 自适应锚索, 岩质边坡, 地震响应, 模型试验, 动力安全系数

Abstract: At the instant of the occurrence of an earthquake, the conventional prestressed anchor cables tend to break due to the insufficient deformation ability suddenly. Once the failure of the anchor cable occurs, the safety of the entire anchorage structure is endangered. This study aims to investigate the seismic response of the adaptive anchor cables and the corresponding dynamic characteristics of the anchored slope. The experiments for the rock slope with adaptive anchor cables are conducted based on a new type of anti-seismic anchor cable as a prototype and accordingly loaded by the shaking table test system. In the experiments, four kinds of seismic waves are applied, such as sinusoidal wave, Tianjin wave, EI wave and Taft wave. The real-time strain of the cables and corresponding seismic response of the slope are monitored. The results show that the axial force of anchor cables is closely related to the amplitude, type, seismic excitation frequency of the seismic wave. The acceleration and displacement on slope surface are enlarged with different elevations, and the peak acceleration and displacement decrease compared to the rock slope without anchor cables. With different values of preset slipping constant resistance of adaptive anchor cables, the anchor cables produce three slip modes such as non-slip, instantaneous slip and gradual slip. The corresponding time history curves of cable strain and dynamic safety coefficient of the anchored slope are identically different. Under the condition of the cable slipping, the safety coefficient of the slope decreases partially, whereas the safety capacity of the anchored structure is large enough to suit for the large deformation and transient impact loads on the rock slope. Therefore, the experimental results provide references for the study on the roadway slope supporting and anti-seismic design of the adaptive anchor cables in the strong earthquake area.

Key words: adaptive anchor cable, rock slope, seismic response, model test, dynamic safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[10] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[11] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[12] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[13] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[14] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[15] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!