›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2387-2394.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.3000

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重塑黏土的高压次固结特性初探

商翔宇1, 2,郝 飞2,顾建祥2,况联飞1,周国庆1,郑秀忠3   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116; 3. 中设设计集团股份有限公司,江苏 南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-29 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
  • 作者简介:商翔宇,男,1977年生,博士,副教授,主要从事深部土力学及地下工程的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51009136,No. 51504245);高等学校学科创新引智计划项目(No. B14021)。

A preliminary study of characteristics of secondary consolidation of remolded clay at high pressure

SHANG Xiang-yu1, 2, HAO Fei2, GU Jian-xiang2, KUANG Lian-fei1, ZHOU Guo-qing1, ZHENG Xiu-zhong3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. China Design Group Co. Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China
  • Received:2016-12-29 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51504245, 51009136) and the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B14021).

摘要: 利用自行研制的高压固结试验系统,对重塑黏土试样进行了竖向压力从0.25 MPa到12.00 MPa的一维固结试验;并利用三轴设备对该土样进行了0.3~2.5 MPa的等向固结试验。试验结果表明:一维固结试验获得的各级压力固结曲线均有明显的次固结阶段,重塑黏土的次固结系数随竖向压力增大而非线性变化;具体而言,当固结压力小于2 MPa,次固结系数随竖向压力增大而显著减小,当固结压力大于2 MPa后,次固结系数则几乎不变;等向固结试验获得的次固结系数则远小于一维固结试验获得的相应值,其随固结压力的变化规律也与一维固结不同。此外,从微观角度对试验结果进行的分析表明,高压下黏土次固结变形的物理机制不同于低压。即低压下黏土次固结变形的主因是颗粒间的相对滑移,而高压下则是结合水膜的蠕变;而且低压下偏应力对次固结变形有控制性影响,但高压下其影响很小。

关键词: 黏土, 高压, 次固结系数, 试验, 物理机制

Abstract: Using self-developed high-pressure oedometer system, we performed one-dimensional consolidation tests (OCT) on reconstituted clay samples at vertical pressures from 0.25 MPa to 12 MPa. In addition, we carried out isotropic consolidation tests (ICT) on the same samples with confining pressures from 0.3 MPa to 2.5 MPa using triaxial apparatus. The test results indicate that all the consolidation curves obtained from OCT have notable secondary consolidation portion, and the secondary consolidation coefficient of remolded clay changes nonlinearly with increasing consolidation pressure. Specifically, when the consolidation pressure is less than 2 MPa, secondary consolidation coefficient decreases significantly with increasing consolidation pressures. but it is almost unchanged for the case of consolidation pressure above 2 MPa. The secondary consolidation coefficients obtained from ICT are much less than those from OCT, and the change of secondary consolidation coefficient with confining pressure obtained from ICT is different from that from OCT. Moreover, the microscopic analyses of the test results show that the physical mechanism underlying secondary consolidation deformation of clay at high pressure is different from that at low pressure. At low pressure, the secondary consolidation deformation mainly results from the relative slip between clay particles while the creep of adsorbed pore water contributes much to the secondary consolidation deformation of clay at high pressure. Moreover, it seems that the deviatoric stress has a dominating influence on the secondary consolidation deformation of clay at low pressure while it has little effect at high pressure.

Key words: clay, high pressure, secondary consolidation coefficient, test, physical mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[3] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[4] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[5] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[6] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[7] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[8] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[9] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[10] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[11] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[12] 谈云志, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰钝化红黏土水敏性的机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2207-2214.
[13] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[14] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[15] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!