路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0091

›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2473-2482.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0091

路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算

陆清元^{1, 2}，罗强^{1, 2}，蒋良潍^{1, 2}

1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院，四川成都 610031；2. 西南交通大学高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室，四川成都 610031

收稿日期:2017-01-16 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
作者简介:陆清元，男，1989年生，博士研究生，主要从事复合地基方面的学习和研究工作。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No. 2013CB036204)；中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划项目(No. 2014G003-B)；西南交通大学博士研究生创新基金项目(No. 143300289)。

Calculation of stress ratio of rigid pile to composite embankment

LU Qing-yuan^{1, 2}, LUO Qiang^{1, 2}, JIANG Liang-wei^{1, 2}

1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China

Received:2017-01-16 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
Supported by:
This work was supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (973 Program) (2013CB036204), the Technology Research and Development of China Railway Corporation (2014G003-B) and the Doctoral Innovation Fund Program of Southwest Jiaotong University (143300289).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 路堤下刚性桩复合地基普遍存在的负摩阻力对桩-土相互作用特性影响显著。基于极限剪切位移受应力水平影响较小而受试样尺寸影响较大的试验结果，提出了桩-土界面剪切刚度随应力水平变化的等单位长度极限剪切位移理想弹塑性模型，针对桩-土相互作用的上部负摩阻力塑性区、中部协调变形弹性区和下部摩擦承载塑性区3区段模式，建立了塑性区非均匀、弹性区非线性的摩阻力分布图式；以均布路堤荷载下等桩长复合地基中单桩等效加固单元体为研究对象，利用单元体荷载传递微分方程，结合桩-土-垫层压缩变形协调条件，推导出了中性面位置及桩-土应力比的解析表达式，分析了路堤荷载及垫层柔度系数的影响。研究表明：中性面位置随垫层柔度系数增加而下移，随路堤荷载增大先下移后上抬；桩-土应力比随垫层柔度系数增加而减小，随路堤荷载提高先增大后降低，据此提出了采用最大桩-土应力比进行桩体布置和垫层设计的技术思路。

关键词: 刚性桩复合地基, 路堤荷载, 荷载传递模型, 桩-土应力比, 中性面位置

Abstract: The negative skin friction of composite foundation with rigid pile has a significant effect on the pile-soil interaction under embankment load. Based on the results of shear tests that ultimate shear displacement is less affected by stress levels but greatly influenced by specimen sizes, an ideal elastic-plastic load transfer model considering the variation of stress-dependent shear stiffness of pile-soil interface is developed. According to the three-section distribution pattern of pile-soil interaction, i.e., the upper plastic zone of negative friction, the central elastic zone of coordinate deformation and the lower plastic zone of friction bearing, a distribution model for skin friction on pile-soil interface describing the nonlinear elastic-zone and inhomogeneous plastic-zone is established. To investigate the equivalent reinforcement of single pile with equal area in rigid pile composite ground under uniformly distributed embankment load, the formulas of the depth of the neutral plane and stress concentration ratio are derived according to the force equilibriums differential equations of a simplified analytical unit cell and the compression deformation compatibility equations of pile-soil-cushion,. the effect of the embankment load and the flexibility coefficient of cushion on the depth of the neutral plane and the stress concentration ratio are analyzed. The analysis indicates that the depth of the neutral plane descends with the increasing of the flexibility coefficient of cushion, and then ascends with the increase of embankment load. The stress concentration ratio decreases with the increasing of the flexibility coefficient of cushion, and decreases afterwards with the increase of embankment load. Hereby, the technical ideas including the pile arrangement and the cushion design using the maximum stress concentration ratio are provided.

Key words: rigid pile composite ground, embankment load, load transfer model, stress concentration ratio, depth of the neutral plane

中图分类号:

TU 431

陆清元，罗强，蒋良潍, . 路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2473-2482.

LU Qing-yuan, LUO Qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, . Calculation of stress ratio of rigid pile to composite embankment[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2473-2482.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
[2]	刘光秀, 李玉根, 曹艳妮, . 路堤荷载下地基的侧向变形计算分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4517-4526.
[3]	姜文雨, 刘一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[4]	王惠昌，王斌，蒋仁贵，王彩莲，张华,. 用桩顶垫层压缩量法计算刚性桩复合地基最大沉降量[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 442-448.
[5]	姚文娟，蔡晨雨. 一种新的超长桩荷载传递模型[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 783-787.
[6]	欧阳芳，张建经，韩建伟，王志佳，吴金标，杨义奎. 包裹碎石桩和碎石桩复合地基抗震性能对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 998-1004.
[7]	杨光华，范泽，姜燕，张玉成 , . 刚性桩复合地基沉降计算的简化方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 76-84.
[8]	佟建兴，闫明礼，王明山，孙训海，杨新辉. 刚性桩复合地基侧向土压力试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1572-1578.
[9]	刘杰，肖佳兴，何杰. 循环荷载下圆柱形桩与楔形桩复合地基工作性状对比试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 631-640.
[10]	胡海涛，夏力农，廖常斌，王立，周松林，黄俊文,. 直接加固软弱下卧土层的地基工作性状模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3511-3516.
[11]	盛桂琳，鲍鹏，苏彩丽，刘德辉 . 刚性桩复合地基桩体抗震性能分析[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1274-1278.
[12]	韩小雷，肖成安，英峻豪 . 地震作用下复合地基-筏板-上部结构相互作用体系的动力弹塑性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 762-768.
[13]	李波，黄茂松 . 长短桩组合路堤桩三维复合拱土拱效应分析[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 203-210.
[14]	梁耀哲. 刚性桩复合地基的主动土压力分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 25-29.
[15]	丁选明，孔纲强，刘汉龙，吕亚茹. 现浇X形桩桩-土荷载传递规律现场试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 489-493.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算

Calculation of stress ratio of rigid pile to composite embankment

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0