›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2691-2698.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2260

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析

严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷   

  1. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-15 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
  • 作者简介:严敏嘉,女,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性评价方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51374163);国家自然科学青年基金(No. 51609183)。

Limit analysis of bedding rock slopes reinforced by prestressed anchor cables under seismic loads

YAN Min-jia, XIA Yuan-you, LIU Ting-ting   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2017-11-15 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374163) and the Young Foundation of the National Natural Science of China (51609183).

摘要: 针对地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡典型模型,提出了一种地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡的极限分析改进方法,该方法考虑了边坡极限状态时锚索的受力变化。基于岩体刚性假设并考虑滑移过程锚索受力变化,结合极限平衡法推导出边坡加固预应力锚索的受力变化公式;地震作用仅考虑地震波传播至滑动面时产生的透射波对边坡稳定性的影响,从功率的角度出发,结合极限分析上限法与强度折减法,考虑预应力锚索受力变化,推导出地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡的动安全系数计算理论公式;结合算例,采用考虑与不考虑滑移过程锚索受力变化两种计算方法,分析了在不同入射波波幅、入射角度及滑动面黏聚力、内摩擦角条件下两种方法计算结果的差异。算例结果表明:考虑与不考虑滑移过程锚索受力变化计算方法,计算得出的动安全系数变化规律一致,但考虑滑移过程锚索受力变化的改进计算方法得出的动安全系数动态变化幅度明显更小,反映了锚索的抗震作用效果,可为地震作用下该类型岩坡的预应力锚索加固设计分析提供参考。

关键词: 顺层岩坡, 预应力锚索, 地震作用, 极限分析, 安全系数

Abstract: An improved limit analysis method was proposed for the bedding rock slope reinforced by pre-stressed anchor cables under seismic loads, according to their typical models. Especially, this improved method considered the force variation of anchor cables when the slope was in a limit equilibrium state. First, based on the assumption of the rigid rock mass and the limit equilibrium method, the formula of the force variation of anchor cables was derived according to the force changes of anchor cables during the sliding process. In this study, the earthquake effect only referred to the influence of the transmitted waves on the stability of the slope when the transmitted waves were generated in the propagation process of the seismic wave into the sliding surface. Second, from the perspective of power, a theoretical formula was derived for calculating the dynamic safety factor of bedding rock slope by combing with the upper bound limit analysis method and the strength reduction method. Finally, in the case study, we analyzed the difference of dynamic safety factors by using two methods with or without considering force variations of anchor cables in the sliding process. Moreover, this study discussed the calculation results by using these two methods under the variations of amplitudes and incident angles of P wave, and the variations of cohesion and friction angles of sliding surface, respectively. The results show that the variation laws of dynamic safety factors obtained by these two methods are consistent. However, the variation degree of dynamic safety factors by the improved method is significantly lower, which indicates that the anti-seismic effect of anchor cables has been fully reflected. This study can provide references for the design and the stability analysis of bedding rock slope reinforced by pre-stressed anchor cables under seismic loads.

Key words: bedding rock slope, prestressed anchor cable, seismic loads, upper bound limit analysis, safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[2] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[3] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[4] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[5] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[6] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[7] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[8] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[9] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[10] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[11] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[12] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[13] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[14] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[15] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!