饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2500

›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2858-2864.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2500

饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解

夏长青^{1, 2}，胡安峰^{1, 2}，崔军^{1, 2}，吕文晓³，谢康和^{1, 2}

1. 浙江大学滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心，浙江杭州 310058； 2. 浙江大学软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室，浙江杭州 310058； 3. 杭州科技职业技术学院城市建设学院，浙江杭州，311402

收稿日期:2016-10-24 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
通讯作者: 胡安峰，男，1974年生，博士，副教授，主要从事软黏土力学、桩基工程与近海岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: anfenghu@zju.edu.cn E-mail:xiacq09@163.com
作者简介:夏长青，男，1991年生，博士研究生，主要从事软黏土力学和地基处理方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 51778572，No. 51278453）；教育部博士点基金资助项目（No. 20120101110029）。

Analytical solutions for one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of saturated soft layered soils

XIA Chang-qing^{1, 2}, HU An-feng^{1, 2}, CUI Jun^{1, 2}, LÜ Wen-xiao³, XIE Kang-he^{1, 2}

(1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 3. Institute of Urban Construction, Hangzhou Polytechnic, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311402, China

Received:2016-10-24 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778572, 51278453) and the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20120101110029).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 假定土体在固结过程中压缩性和渗透性的变化成正比，基于 - 及 - 关系，推导出饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解，分别给出了按沉降定义和按有效应力定义的每层土平均固结度及整个土层总固结度的计算公式。采用Fortran语言编制了相应的计算程序，将计算得到的结果与已有双层地基一维非线性固结解析解计算结果进行比较，验证该解析解的正确性。利用该程序分析成层地基一维非线性固结性状，分别讨论了初始竖向渗透系数、初始体积压缩系数、荷载值及土层厚度对地基固结性状的影响。分析结果表明：在成层地基一维非线性固结过程中，初始竖向渗透系数对超静孔压的影响较为复杂，对上下层地基固结速率影响不同；初始体积压缩系数增大，超静孔压增大，固结速率变小；所加荷载值越大，超静孔压消散越慢，固结发展越慢；超静孔压消散速率不仅取决于土层厚度，同时取决于各层土渗透性的相对大小。

关键词: 饱和软土, 成层地基, 非线性固结, 解析解, 固结性状

Abstract: Adopting the hypotheses that the variation of compressibility is proportional to permeability, and based on - and - relationships, analytical solutions are derived for one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of saturated soft layered soils. The average degrees of consolidation of each layer and whole layered soils are defined in terms of settlement and effective stress respectively. A relevant computational program is developed by Fortran in this paper, and the solutions are verified by comparing with the existing analytical solutions for the one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of double-layered soils. It is shown that in the process of the nonlinear consolidation of layered soils, the influence of the permeability is complex. The influence of permeability on the excess pore water pressure in the upper and the lower layers is different. The larger compressibility is, the greater the excess pore water pressure is, and the slower the rate of dissipation of the excess pore water pressure and greater the value of loading generate slow dissipation of the excess pore water pressure, and the slow consolidation process. The rate of dissipation of the excess pore water pressure depends not only on the layers thickness, but also the relative value of permeability of each layer soil.

Key words: saturated soft soils, layered soils, nonlinear consolidation, analytical solutions, consolidation behavior

中图分类号:

TU 447

夏长青，胡安峰，崔军，吕文晓，谢康和, . 饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2858-2864.

XIA Chang-qing, HU An-feng, CUI Jun, Lü Wen-xiao, XIE Kang-he, . Analytical solutions for one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of saturated soft layered soils[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2858-2864.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[2]	朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[3]	刘国钊, 乔亚飞, 何满潮, 樊勇, . 活动性断裂带错动下隧道纵向响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 923-932.
[4]	程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[5]	蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[6]	张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[7]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[8]	夏才初, 刘宇鹏, 吴福宝, 徐晨, 邓云纲, . 基于西原模型的圆形隧道黏弹-黏塑性解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1638-1648.
[9]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[10]	信亚雯, 周志芳, 马筠, 李鸣威, 陈朦, 汪姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[11]	蒙宇涵, 陈征, 冯健雪, 李红坡, 梅国雄, . 初始孔压非均布下一维地基砂垫层优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4793-4800.
[12]	黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[13]	杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.
[14]	吴纲，孙红月，付崔伟，陈永珍，汤碧辉，. 软土虹吸排水完整井非稳定流模型及解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3355-3361.
[15]	吉恩跃，朱俊高，余挺，金伟,. 橡皮膜嵌入解析解及试验验证[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2780-2786.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解

Analytical solutions for one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of saturated soft layered soils

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0