›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2873-2885.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0212

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

北疆侏罗系与白垩系泥质砂岩物理力学特性对比分析及其能量损伤演化机制研究

陈子全1,何 川1,董唯杰1,马杲宇1,潘旭勇2,裴成元2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;2. 新疆额尔齐斯河流域开发工程建设管理局,新疆 乌鲁木齐 831500
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-05 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 董唯杰,男,1985年生,博士,讲师,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:dongwj@swjtu.edu.cn E-mail:chen_ziquan@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈子全,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点研发计划项目资助(No. 2016YFC0802201);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No. 2682018CX04);2017年度西南交通大学博士研究生创新基金项目资助。

Physico-mechanical properties and its energy damage evolution mechanism of the Jurassic and Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone in Northern Xinjiang

CHEN Zi-quan1, HE Chuan1, DONG Wei-jie1, MA Gao-yu1, PAN Xu-yong2, PEI Cheng-yuan2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Xinjiang Irtysh River Basin Authority of Engineering Development and Construction, Urumqi, Xinjiang 831500, China
  • Received:2018-02-05 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0802201), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2682018CX04) and the 2017 Doctoral Innovation Fund Program of Southwest Jiaotong University.

摘要: 特殊的地理、气候条件及工程地质的复杂性决定了在北疆地区软岩地层中修建引水隧洞的设计施工难度较大。隧洞成拱效应与围岩自稳能力差,围岩渗透性强,遇水软化特性显著,极易产生软岩大变形甚至坍塌失稳灾害。为进一步研究北疆地区侏罗系与白垩系泥质砂岩的物理力学性质、遇水软化特性与能量损伤演化机制,开展了二者的单轴压缩、常规三轴与单轴蠕变试验。研究结果表明:两种岩石均富含黏土矿物,白垩系泥质砂岩的粒径分配更好,但其胶结程度较差,导致其强度稳定性与地层波速相对较低。低围压条件下,两者均以环向变形与体积扩容为主,但随着围压升高,其破坏模式由体积扩张过渡到体积压缩类型。高围压加载会造成岩石内部损伤,从而导致其抗压强度的降低。遇水后,两种岩石的延塑性与应变软化特性均明显增强,白垩系泥质砂岩的遇水软化特性更为显著。白垩系泥质砂岩的蠕变特性更为显著,两者的长期强度接近其单轴压缩损伤应力值。两种泥质砂岩的能量损伤演化过程均呈现S型变化规律,侏罗系泥质砂岩的能量硬化特性更为显著,白垩系泥质砂岩会更早地进入到能量硬化与能量软化阶段。

关键词: 侏罗系与白垩系, 泥质砂岩, 力学特性, 遇水软化, 损伤演化

Abstract: The design and construction of the diversion tunnel are very difficult in the soft rock strata of the Northern Xinjiang, which is caused by the complexity of geographical, climatic conditions and engineering geology. The large deformation and even collapse hazards of surrounding rock are very easily to be encountered, due to its bad self-stability, strong permeability and water-softening characteristics. Hence, the uniaxial, triaxial compression tests and uniaxial creep tests were conducted to further study the physical and mechanical properties, water-softening characteristics and energy damage evolution mechanism of the Jurassic and Cretaceous argillaceous sandstones of Northern Xinjiang. Compared with the results of these two kinds of soft rocks both with rich clay minerals, the particle size distribution of the Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone was more uniform, but its cementation degree was lower. As a result, the strength, stability and the wave velocities of strata in the Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone were lower than those in Jurassic argillaceous sandstone. Under the condition of low confining pressure, two kinds of rock deformation were mainly circumferential deformation and volume expansion. With the increase of confining pressure, the failure mode changed from volume expansion to volume compression type. High confining pressure loading can cause internal damage of rock structure, resulting in the reduction of compressive strength. When these two kinds of rocks were saturated, the ductility and strain softening characteristics were significantly enhanced. The water-softening characteristic of the Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone was much more obvious. Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone had more significant creep characteristics, and their long-term strengths were both close to their damage stress values in uniaxial compression tests. The energy damage evolution processes of two kinds of argillaceous sandstones both showed the S-shaped evolution law. The energy-hardening characteristic of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone was more significant, but the Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone was earlier to enter energy-hardening and energy-softening stages.

Key words: Jurassic and Cretaceous, argillaceous sandstone, mechanical properties, water softening, damage evolution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 458

[1] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[2] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[3] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[5] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[6] 宋勇军, 杨慧敏, 张磊涛, 任建喜. 冻结红砂岩单轴损伤破坏CT实时试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 152-160.
[7] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[8] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[9] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[10] 王冲, 胡大伟, 任金明, 周辉, 卢景景, 刘传新, . 侵蚀性环境对地下结构渗透和力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
[11] 丛 怡, 丛 宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
[12] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[13] 谢凯楠, 姜德义, 孙中光, 宋中强, 王静怡, 杨 涛, 蒋 翔, . 基于低场核磁共振的干湿循环对泥质砂岩 微观结构劣化特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 653-659.
[14] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 汪勇, 王昊, 刘旭亮, . 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性 及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4156.
[15] 郭孔灵, 杨磊, 盛祥超, 梅洁, 李邦翔, 张波, 杨为民, 宋光啸, . 水力耦合作用下含三维裂隙类岩石材料的 破裂力学行为及声发射特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4380-4390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!