›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2922-2932.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0538

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

采空区建筑地基适宜性及沉降变形计算工程实例分析

任连伟1,周桂林1,顿志林1,何停印2,杨权威3,张敏霞1   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000;2. 河南省焦作地质勘察设计有限公司,河南 焦作454000; 3. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-04 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 顿志林,男,1964年生,硕士,教授,主要从事矿井建设与岩土工程相关方面的研究工作。E-mail: dzl1964@163.com E-mail:renhpu@163.com
  • 作者简介:任连伟,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地基基础相关方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51508166)

Case study on suitability and settlement of foundation in goaf site

REN Lian-wei1, ZHOU Gui-lin1, DUN Zhi-lin1, HE Ting-yin2, YANG Quan-wei3, ZHANG Min-xia1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Henan Jiaozuo Geological Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 3. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2018-04-04 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508166).

摘要: 基于稳定采空区场地并结合某一工程实例进行建筑地基沉降变形计算分析,并对采空区地基适宜性进行综合评判。提出一种适合于采空区地基的荷载影响深度 确定方法,采用概率积分法对采空区场地不同区域剩余变形进行预测,提出考虑活化变形、剩余变形、附加变形的采空区建筑地基沉降变形计算方法,研究结果表明:(1)建筑荷载相同时判别系数越小(0.10 (自重应力)、0.08 、0.07 、0.05 ),荷载影响深度越大;判别系数相同时建筑荷载越大,荷载影响深度也随之非线性增大。(2)对于一般采空区地基,宜采用 (附加应力)= 0.10 判别标准确定荷载影响深度;对于复杂采空区地基,宜采用 0.05 判别标准确定荷载影响深度。(3)在常规方法上( 0.20 )确定的荷载影响深度 ,对于采空区地基经对比分析,1.4 和1.8 荷载影响深度可作为一般采空区地基和复杂采空区地基工程设计参考。(4)在不引起活化变形的最高层数建筑荷载下,地表剩余变形量非常小可忽略不计,采空区建筑地基沉降变形主要是土层附加压缩变形。(5)数值模拟结果表明,采空区内边缘沉降较大、不均匀沉降明显,不宜作为建设场地;采空区中央沉降较小,没有明显不均匀沉降,宜作为建设场地。

关键词: 采空区建筑地基, 荷载影响深度, 沉降计算, 适宜性评价

Abstract: The settlement of foundation in stable goaf site is analyzed to evaluated its suitability. One calculation method of load influence depth for goaf ground is proposed. The residual deformation of goaf ground is predicted by the probability integral method, and the settlement calculation method of building ground on goaf is put forward considering the activated deformation, the residual deformation and the additional deformation. Research results show that: 1) The less the coefficient of standard (0.10 (self-weight stress of ground), 0.08 , 0.07 , 0.05 ) under the same building load, the greater the influence depth. The larger the building load under the same coefficient, the influence depth is increased non-linearly. 2) The standard of (additional stress of ground) = 0.10 should be used to determine the influence depth for normal goaf ground, and the standard of 0.05 for complicated goaf ground. 3) The influence depth is determined by the conventional standard ( 0.20 ), and the 1.4 and 1.8 can be used as goaf building design for the normal goaf and complicated goaf. 4) The residual deformation of goaf ground is very small and can be negligible under the maximum building load without the activated deformation, and the settlement deformation of building ground is mainly the additional compression deformation. 5) Numerical results show that the ground settlement at the edge of goaf is large, and its uneven settlement is obvious, so the edge of goaf is not suitable as construction sites; however, the ground settlement at the central of goaf is small, and there is no obvious uneven settlement, so the central of goaf is suitable as construction sites.

Key words: buliding ground on goaf, load influence depth, ground settlement calculation, suitability evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 433

[1] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[2] 周佳锦,龚晓南,王奎华,张日红,王孟波,. 层状地基中静钻根植竹节桩单桩沉降计算[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 109-116.
[3] 王惠昌,王 斌,蒋仁贵,王彩莲,张 华,. 用桩顶垫层压缩量法计算刚性桩复合地基最大沉降量[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 442-448.
[4] 杨光华 ,范 泽 ,姜 燕 ,张玉成 , . 刚性桩复合地基沉降计算的简化方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 76-84.
[5] 齐昌广 ,刘干斌 ,陈永辉 ,郭 卫,. 塑料套管管侧前注浆桩承载特性的现场试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2377-2385.
[6] 杨 晶 ,白晓红,. 压实黄土非线性压缩应力-应变关系在地基沉降计算中的应用[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1002-1008.
[7] 徐学勇 ,陈国海 ,汪 稔 ,狄圣杰 ,杜文博,. 深厚淤泥爆破挤淤堤坝沉降计算与分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 364-369.
[8] 张敏静 ,罗 强 ,詹学启 ,张 良 . 高速铁路穿透型CFG桩复合地基沉降计算修正系数分析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 519-525.
[9] 金耀华 钱玉林 吕凡任. 基于应力路径的实用沉降计算方法[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3071-3074.
[10] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089-3096.
[11] 曾玲玲 洪振舜 刘松玉 章定文 杜延军. 天然沉积结构性土的次固结变形预测方法[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3136-3142.
[12] 郭 超,闫澍旺,肖世伟,陈则连. 低强度桩复合地基沉降计算方法研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 155-159.
[13] 程 雨,朱庆杰,党旭光,刘 峰. 基于GIS城镇土地利用防灾适宜性评价方法分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 505-508.
[14] 李仁平. 基于原位试验成果的地基非线性沉降分析[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 345-351.
[15] 陈 阵,陶龙光,李 涛,李海斌,王综勇. 支护结构作用的箱基沉降计算新方法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2978-2984.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!