›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2933-2940.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0024

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨诱发填方路堤边坡变形机制物理模拟研究

赵建军1,余建乐1,解明礼1,柴贺军2,李 涛1,步 凡1,蔺 冰1   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都610059; 2. 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司,重庆 400067
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-07 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:赵建军,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事工程地质方面的教学科研工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划(No. 2015BAK09B01);国家创新研究群体科学基金(No. 41521002);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助项目 (No. 2013CB733202)。

Physical model studies on fill embankment slope deformation mechanism under rainfall condition

ZHAO Jian-jun1, YU Jian-le1, XIE Ming-li1, CHAI He-jun2, LI Tao1, BU Fan1, LIN Bing1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geo-hazard Prevention and Geo-environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. Chongqing Communications Research &Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Merchants, Chongqing 400067, China
  • Received:2017-01-07 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program(2015BAK09B01), the Funds for Creative Research Groups of China(41521002) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2013CB733202).

摘要: 填方路堤变形失稳是西部山区工程建设的常见问题。重庆某高速公路边坡为典型的堆载条件下降雨诱发型滑坡,填方堆载后,填方边坡在连续降雨条件下,沿基岩之上的软弱面产生滑动破坏。定性分析认为,降雨在滑坡形成中起着关键作用,为了研究填方边坡在降雨条件下的变形破坏机制及孔隙水压力与变形之间的关系,采用物理模拟方法研究边坡变形失稳的全过程,分析孔隙水压力随降雨时间的变化规律及其与变形破坏的关系。研究结果表明:边坡后缘大方量堆载,改变了其应力条件,是滑坡产生的主要因素。场地施工改变了原有的地表水环境,连续强降雨致使大量下渗的雨水,不仅显著改变坡体应力条件,而且雨水沿着滑面运移软化滑带,是滑坡产生的重要诱发因素。孔隙水压力在坡体失稳过程中起着关键作用,填方体土碎屑、泥质含量大,下渗的雨水携带上部细小颗粒及滑带泥质成分至滑带附近,堵塞地下水消散通道,表现为坡体变形积累,孔隙水压力增加;边坡变形陡增,孔隙水压力降低。该滑坡破坏分为降雨下渗、滑带饱水软化、后缘产生裂缝、裂缝贯通-整体滑动4个阶段,为蠕滑-拉裂式滑坡。

关键词: 填方路堤, 滑坡, 孔隙水压力, 变形, 物理模拟

Abstract: Deformation of filled embankment and its stability are common engineering problems of the western mountains area construction. A typical slope of one expressway in Chongqing slides along the weak stratum on the bedrock after stacking fill, under the condition of continuous heavy rain. To study the failure mechanism of the landslide, physical simulation is adopted to study the rainfall influence on slope deformation. We also analyze pore water pressure change with the rainfall time and its relationship with the deformation and failure. The results show that the landslide deformation and failure is due to large amount of stack at trailing edge, changing the slope stress condition greatly. Secondly, the construction changes the original hydrological environment, and continuous heavy rains cause a lot of rain infiltration into the slope. Pore water pressure in the process of the landslide plays a key role. Embankment has a mass of debris and argillaceous, which can be carried to the slide zone with rainwater. And argillaceous of slide is the same. These substances can block the dissipate of groundwater. This phenomenon is the accumulation of slope deformation and pore water pressure. Deformation suddenly increase and pore water pressure decrease. The landslide can divide four phases: rainfall infiltration, slide with full water softening, trailing edge cracks, crack through whole sliding. The final landslide deformation failure mode is creeping-cracking.

Key words: fill embankment, landslide, pore water pressure, deformation, physical model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 471

[1] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[2] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[3] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[4] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[5] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[6] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[7] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[8] 罗刚, 张辉傲, 马国涛, 周海文, 胡卸文, 王文健, 王文沛, . 高速岩质滑坡滑面滑动摩擦特性研究——以王山 抓口寺滑坡为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2441-2452.
[9] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[10] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[11] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[12] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[13] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[14] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[15] 王刚, 秦相杰, 江成浩, 张振宇. 温度作用下CT三维重建煤体微观 结构的渗流和变形模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1750-1760.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!