›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2984-2990.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工格室加筋土垫层路堤临界高度研究

梁 程1,徐 超1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-10 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:梁程,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事土工合成材料(加筋土结构)和地基加固方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41272293)

Study on critical height of reinforced embankments with geocell layer

LIANG Cheng1, XU Chao1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2016-12-10 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272293).

摘要: 土工格室能有效减少软土地基上路堤的变形,并增强其稳定性,但对于土工格室加筋土垫层路堤的临界高度还少有研究。采用极限平衡分析方法,假定地基在路堤荷载作用下呈圆弧滑动破坏模式,将格室及其内的填土视为复合体,考虑格室复合体的应力扩散作用和侧向限制作用,提出了路堤临界高度的计算模型,并将该模型值与建立的有限差分模型结果进行对比,然后讨论了格室高度、应力扩散角及格室复合体与地基接触面摩擦系数对路堤临界高度的影响规律。结果表明,理论分析和数值计算结果吻合较好;加筋路堤的临界高度明显大于未加筋路堤的临界高度,并且增加此3种影响因素的取值均能提高路堤的临界高度;同时增强格室的侧向限制作用比提高格室高度和应力扩散角更有利于路堤的稳定。

关键词: 加筋土路堤, 土工格室, 复合体, 稳定性, 临界高度

Abstract: Geocell geosynthetics can effectively reduce the deformation of embankments on soft subgrade and enhance its stability, but there are few researches on critical height of geocell-supported embankments. In this study, the limit equilibrium method was employed, and circular sliding failure mode presented in the foundation under the embankment load was assumed firstly. Geocell and its filled soil were regarded as composite material considering its vertical stress dispersion effects and lateral confinement effects. An analytical model about critical height of the embankments was then proposed and its results were compared with that of the finite difference model which was calculated using FLAC. Finally, the effects of geocell height, angle of stress dispersion and friction coefficient between geocell layer and foundation on the critical height of embankments were discussed based on the analytical model. It turned out that the results between theoretical analysis and numerical calculation were well coincident with each other. The critical height of geocell-reinforced embankments was obviously greater than the critical height of unreinforced ones. Increasing the three influencing factors can improve its critical height, and strengthening the lateral confinement of geocell layer was more in favor of the stability of embankments than improving the geocell height and angle of stress dispersion.

Key words: reinforced embankments, geocell, composite material, stability, critical height

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472

[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[3] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[5] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[6] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[7] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[8] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[9] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[10] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[11] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[12] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[13] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[14] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[15] 吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!